Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:06:29 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
There is a kind of compromise position between "if it's not acting as a
noun, it can't be a pronoun" and "if it's anaphoric, it's a pronoun" --
but it's a bit weaselly. With regular possessives, it's apparent that a
noun or noun phrase is being used as a determiner, with the genitive -s
acting as a marker of this status:
John John's daughter
The king of England the king of England's daughter
I don't think there's any disagreement that "John" is basically a noun,
but the suffix -s turns it into a determiner. Now for the weaselly part:
for forms like "my" and "your," we can just argue that there is, in
fact, a full pronoun in there somewhere -- but the genitive marking
folds into the form itself so it's hard to see. So, just like many
linguists would like to treat "went" as "go+ed," we can treat "my" as
"I+s." The "I" part is an anaphoric pronoun, but the suffix makes it a
determiner.
Bill Spruiell
Dept. of English
Central Michigan University
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|