CONNELLS Archives

October 1996

CONNELLS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alfred Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Connells <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Oct 1996 15:36:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
At 10:28 AM 10/2/96 -0400, you wrote:
>---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
>Sender:       The Connells <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster:       Matthew Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: Bootlegging versus tape trading
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> They are all good! Trading should
>> augment your collection, not be the focal point.
>
>I have to disagree with you on this point.  The bands that I am the
>biggest fans of all allow tape trading, and I must admit that I own more
>tapes (of concerts, bootlegs if you will) of Phish, Dave Matthews as well
>as others, than albums.
 
 (and I do own every Dave, Phish, and
>...almost all of the Connells).  But the focal point of my music
>collection is bootlegs, that really show how talented the
>musicians are in a band.
> Just my $0.002
>Matthew
>
 
 
i'm not trying to be mean, but i honestly do not understand how someone can
enjoy the connells and also enjoy phish.  everyone is welcome to their own
tastes - this is just one band i don't understand being used in the same
sentence with the connells.
 
                                        -alfred
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2