Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:37:30 -0800 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Burkhard,
You're quite right. I spoke (emailed) too quickly when I said "supposed
to" might be a single morpheme. It has at least a couple. But I think the
concept of "quasi-modals" is a legitimate category even if--like all other
categories of grammar--not leak-proof. A quasi-modal is (to take a stab at
an informal definition) a group of words, normally two, that function as a
auxillary verb. Furthermore, the definition must hinge on this: the two
words semantically as well as grammatically work together & breaking them
apart would be counter-intuitive. Sometimes, then, this name is applied by
default--when, as with the sentence in question here--there seems to be no
other way to analyze the sentence.
Larry Beason,Director
English Composition Program
Dept. of English
Eastern Washington University
Cheney WA 99004
[log in to unmask]
WAC Page: http://ewu66649.ewu.edu/WAC.html
|
|
|