> Considering how easy it is to save a html-file as a plain txt-file I hope
> this, the example above, won't evolve into a bad habit. Please, you people who
> have something to tell your fellow Connells fans, spare us from the html-=
> code. I guess, and hope, I'm not the only one who has this opinion.
 
Actually, I believe it was the intention of the sender that the whole page,
graphics, links, text and all, be made available to the list, not just the text.
I simply saved the file (it came in to my mailer as an attachment) to disk,
started Netscape 3.0, opened the saved file from the File menu, and it displayed
the file as a Web page, replete with all the graphics.  I thought it was pretty
cool.
 
Wasn't that the idea?  Or was the sender really just being lazy?  (oh yeah, I
expect a candid answer to that one...  ;)
 
--Steve