CONNELLS Archives

June 1999

CONNELLS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Connells <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:08:42 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
I must add to this.  There is nothing wrong with any of Cheryl's posts.
Cheryl, please do us a favor and stay on the list permanently instead of
temporarily--there's simply no need for all this.  Really.
I think most of us appreciate the interesting variety of folks who post to
this list -- everyone has something different to express, and everyone's
got a different way of expressing it.  That doesn't mean anyone's wrong.
This is a good list.   I love reading 99.9% of the messages posted.

My 2 cents.
To everyone going to Norfolk, have a great time!

"Love and Mercy is what we need tonight / Love and Mercy to you and your
friends tonight..."








Dede Davis <[log in to unmask]> on 06/17/99 07:50:08 AM

Please respond to The Connells <[log in to unmask]>

To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:    (bcc: Stacee Killian/Catalog/Sundance)

Subject:  Re: OT:  Apology to Dede (no Connells content)



--- "Cheryl A. Wolf" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Last evening I thoughtlessly sent this listserv an
> off-topic post, which was also interpreted as an
> attack on Dede.  I accept full responsibility for the
> OT-edness of my message and wish to apologize to all
> 200+ subscribers.  More importantly, I wish to
> publically convey my most sincere apologies to Miss
> Davis, though no offense was intended and I do hope
> none was taken (except by the most homonymally
> challenged amongst you).
>
Uh....*I* thought it was funny.  If there are folks out there defending
my honor, thanks, I appreciate it but, trust me, I am fully capable of
doing so myself.

> As I have previously been informed by the list-police

We have list-police?  Art, what do you know about this?

> that the following topics are unacceptable subject
> matter for my postings: "old" information or requests
> for same, urls to current information or request for
> same, information regarding the availability of
> Connells "collectables",

I'm always glad to see info about collectibles; I can't imagine any
*fan* not feeling the same way.  Makes me wonder just who these
erstwhile "list-police" are.

> I bid
> you all an unhappy, regrettable and final adieu.
>
I certainly hope this is not true!!!!  I enjoy *all* of Cheryl's
posts--they are usually funny and informative.  And this list is
usually so fuckin' dead, I can't imagine anyone wanting LESS traffic on
it!  Geez, I email and telephone half the listmembers on a personal
basis anyway, it seems like.  Maybe I just start a daily journal on
here or something.  Seems like an awful waste of memory to just have
one post a month.
===
Dede

"Give it up, halfway back the room!
Halfway back the room ain't givin' up *shit*."--DJMacMillan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2