Jed,

 

These types of constructions quite regularly teeter back and forth over the passive/adjectival divide. In the case of participles whose adjectival uses are “gradable,” you can add material to force one or the other reading:

 

            (1)        Everyone was bored by Senator Pouncetrifle’s speech on truffle tariffs.

 

            (2)        Everyone was profoundly bored during Senator Pouncetrifle’s speech on truffle tariffs.

 

            (3)        ? Everyone was profoundly bored by Senator Pouncetrifle’s speech on truffle tariffs.

 

 Adding a by-phrase, as in (1), makes it more passivish; modifying the participle with an intensifier makes it more adjective-ish. This predicts that trying to do both at once, as in (3), should produce something that sounds odd; I’m not sure how much (3) bothers people though. I couldn’t do this with “canceled,” since it’s much, much harder to be “very canceled” than it is to be “very unique.”

 

Frankly, I don’t see any problem with the idea that people can assign more than one structure to the same construction without it being ambiguous, but that’s a loaded theoretical issue.

 

Bill Spruiell

Dept. of English

Central Michigan University

 

 


From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John E. Dews
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:48 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Passive voice vs. adjectival

 

Hi all,

   I have a question about the following sentence:

          He told us that the party was cancelled.

 

   A student of mine was analyzing this sentence and suggested that cancelled could be seen as an adjectival (a participal functioning as a predicate adjective). My initial response was that cancelled was simply the lexical verb in a passive voice verb string with was being the past tense auxiliary. However, I'm hesitant to "veto" the student's interpretation. Not to be too Humpty Dumpty about it, but is it plausible to say that cancelled functions however the student perceives it/means it to function? If he perceives this structure as a modification of party and NOT as an agentless passive, then can I accept and validate his interpretation?

!   Thanks for helping me think through this!

     Jed

 

*****************************************************************

John E. Dews

Instructor, Undergraduate Linguistics

MA-TESOL/Applied Linguistics Program

Educator, Secondary English Language Arts

English Department, 208 Rowand-Johnson Hall (Office)

University of Alabama

 


Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/