To all on the LIST,

I've been marking several of your comments that relate to my thesis topic of how grammar affects meaning as seen by a writing center consultant; there's so much great stuff here that I can't believe someone didn't direct me to you guys before. Would any or all of you be willing to let me use some of your comments to further develop my thesis? I think it would be really great to have some quotes or ideas from minds currently teaching or theorizing in the field of writing. This commentary is also helping me further develop my views and practices as a writing center consultant; I'll probably be working at my university center again next year as a grad student, and it's kind of neat to look back on one's progress and the sequence and development of ideas. It's also probably good that I'm learning how to better help my clients (sorry for the split infinitive; I'm at war with them at the moment).

I used the word "develop" way too often in that paragraph, but I hope you'll forgive me; it just seemed to be the best word to use here.

As a pre-P.S., what would I do with the relative pronoun in this sentence:

She was whom I thought she was.

Should I leave the "whom" alone, as it plays the correct part as object in the relative clause? Or should I change it to "who" since I have a form of "to be" before it and since it's acting as a subject complement of sorts? Isn't the rule with relative clauses and "who/whom" to give the relative pronoun its case from its particular clause, but its gender and number from the main clause, as in Latin?

Thanks all; please keep commenting so I can keep learning.

- Allison
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/