Dear Elizabeth - I'm intrigued by your suggestion -- go further, would
you? Are you suggesting that, for instance, we could implement a
"traditional" sequence (once we've established one) and go
about it by use of multiple intelligence strategies? Or rather, produce a
sequence that works for one group, and an alternate sequence for another?
What do you have in mind?
Gordon Hultberg
At 11:21 AM 11/20/2006, you wrote:
I'm a new member (so new that my
check hasn't even come back). I learned about ATEG when I read
The War Against Grammar by David Mulroy.
As an adjunct teaching mostly developmental English and first-year
writing courses at college in the Denver metro area, I've seen how little
students know about grammar--and writing. The developmental
coordinator at one college said that the students had been taught grammar
in public schools but "it didn't take." From what I've
read and observed, that doesn't seem to be the case; students generally
aren't being taught grammar--at least not methodically.
I have a hypothesis, and I'm wondering if anyone has read or heard
anything related to it. (You may have discussed this before.)
Here's my idea: From what I've observed, most K-12 language arts
teachers and English faculty seem to be right brained but the traditional
method of teaching grammar is left brained. I happen to be left
brained (I was a math major until I was a senior), and I enjoy teaching
grammar and diagramming sentences. I think the
"traditional" step-by-step approach should work well with
left-brained students, but right-brained teachers find it boring and
don't want to learn or teach grammar that way. Maybe we need two
methods of teaching grammar--or more--to suit different learning
styles.
Elizabeth Clark
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join
or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at
http://ateg.org/