Since you're still talking about my friend John and his rejected application, may I please ask for clarification? I don't know what you're talking about. Please put some meat on the bones.
 
.brad.16feb08.

DD Farms <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
Craig Hancock wrote: The point all of us are trying to make (patiently, I think) is that context matters.
 
"John was angry. His application had been turned down twice in three weeks."
 
There are very good reasons to mix these structures in a single sentence.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~

DD: I think we are dealing with the investigation of a receiver's tentative understanding of the content of the messages before and after the interception of a partial transmission. It is related to the study of redundancy in Communication Theory. It is not a trivial matter.


Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/