Craig Hancock <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
   
  Brad,

  I am absolutely baffled why you believe "It was like the revival of an old melodrama that I had seen long ago with childish awe" is not correct.
   
  Tell me how you feel about, "It was like the revival of an old melodrama that I saw long ago with childish awe", "saw" being the past tense of "to see". He saw it long ago.
   
  The other point I would like to make is that people don't put "had" in front of past tense verbs.
   
  They put 'had' in front of words that are, in context, past tense verbs, as in this item from today's newspaper, describing an accident scene: "He said his son (had) told him that he was going to the race with his cousin".
   
  "Had" is followed by a past participle, which is identical with the past tense form for all regular verbs. That's true, as with "told" above, which is why I say they put 'had' in front of past tense verbs. In the quote, "told" is a past tense verb.
   
  "He walked through fields he (had) walked as a child" is perfectly well formed ... without the 'had'.
   
  If you are correcting verb phrases like that, then you are deeply mistaken.
  
I think writing teachers, like doctors, should "first do no harm." Agreed.


       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/