----- Original Message -----From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Jane SaralTo: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 9:59 AMSubject: May and mightIn this morning's Atlanta Journal Costitution is the following head and subhead:Study: Slow decisions hurt help for MarinesTougher truck may have saved troopsI would say that the word might should have been used, since they were not saved. May seems to me appropriate only if they were saved and one is speculating as to why.Is that a correct assumption? And could someone explain the differences between the two forms?Jane SaralTo join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/