What you’re describing as well-spokenness is mastery of
what’s known as Standard English, a contested term that we’ll just
decide to live with for now. Standard English began to develop in the
late 14th c. as the English of the London Chancery, the office particularly
responsible land litigation in the wake of the Black Death that afflicted most
of Europe in the middle of the century. This dialect gained further
support in the 15th c. with the introduction of the printing press
to England. When William Caxton set up his London printing business
around 1480, he chose the prestige dialect of the literate classes in SE
England as the dialect he would print, and his spelling, the foundation of
modern spelling, reflected their pronunciation. Grammars started being
written at about that time and a tradition developed that fostered what we call
Standard English until in the 18th c., with the rise of the Middle
Class, educated London English became the Standard. This Standard English
was passed along in educated families, and as more families became educated it
spread farther. Certain features of Standard English grammar, like the
grammar of wh-relative clauses and the more frequent use of other subordinate
clauses, not to mention the use of more Latinate and Franco-Latin vocabulary,
became markers of Standard English. Children in these households were
exposed to such English from birth, and so when they started school they had an
advantage over the classmates who had a working class background.
Children from a working class background may acquire Standard
English in school, but many don’t. One question I’ve had my
undergrads consider is the English spoken by them, the ones who went on to
higher education, as opposed to those who did not, and they recognized
immediately an important divide between the two that shows up in mastery of
Standard English. With it you can go on to higher education and
prestigious careers; without it it’s much more difficult to do so.
There was a fascinating and poignant article in the Chronicle of
Higher Education some years back, an autobiographical piece by a young faculty
member who had come from a working class background. She was the first of
her family to go beyond high school. She was still uncomfortable with her
mastery of Standard English, and she wrote about how the few faculty colleagues
of hers who came from working class backgrounds shared her sense of linguistic
insecurity and fear of committing a linguistic faux pas. She mentioned
that there were words found in educated spoken vocabulary that she and her
friends had never confronted in speech and they ran the risk of mispronouncing
them. In a higher education faculty environment, as she found out,
mispronunciation of certain words can be seriously stigmatizing, even in a
career threatening way.
So much for the classless society.
Herb
From: Assembly for the
Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brad
Johnston
Sent: 2008-02-06 22:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: a president who has a strong command of the English language
Is it true that well-spoken-ness starts with the
acquisition of grammar and vocabulary by the young, i.e., school children? Is
that whence it comes?
Carol Morrison <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
I am curious to see which of the candidates has the best
grammar and who is the most well-spoken. I will be listening attentively to
upcoming speeches, interviews, and press conferences. It would be nice to
have a president who has a strong command of the English language. That person
will get my vote (maybe). Any favorites?
CLM
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find
them fast with Yahoo! Search. To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please
visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/