I’m not sure there’s enough context here to tell.  They certainly work, but they change the passage in ways the author might not like.  One effect of moving from simple past to past perfect is to reduce the sense of immediacy.  The passage becomes a little less vital with the past perfects.  This is one of those speaker/writer attitudinal effects that determine a lot of our choices between tenses.  The rules are not simple and straightforward.

 

Herb

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brad Johnston
Sent: 2008-02-17 09:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Context matters - continued

 

In context, do the five 'had's belong in or out?

 

"Beyond containment, the major thrust of American Cold War diplomatic foreign policy was to return the defeated enemies, Germany and Japan, to the emerging international system as full-fledged members. This task, unprecedented in respect to nations on which unconditional surrender (had been) was imposed less than five years earlier, made sense to a generation of American leaders whose formative experience (had been) was overcoming the Great Depression of the 1930s. The generation that organized resistance to the Soviet Union (had) experienced Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, which (had) restored political stability by closing the gap between American expectations and economic reality. The same generation (had) prevailed in World War II, fought in the name of democracy."

 

 

Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/