A psychologist friend of mine now living in Idaho is coaching nurses for a test they must pass in English skills. The test used by the state of Idaho for this purpose is called the "Test of Essential Academic Skills" and is published by "ATI" which stands for Assessment Technologies Institute. In her coaching, my friend is using the official Pre-Test Study Manual published by ATI. She has been so shocked by what she has found in the Test Study Manual that she called to ask if I know of an official professional body that might pronounce judgment on a company putting out shoddy, error-filled material. I don't think ATEG is in the business of issuing such pronouncements, but I wonder if people out there with what are now called "creds" in English grammar and usage would be willing to express themselves on the materials. Does anybody know to whom one might report ATI? These examples are all from the ATI-published official Pre-Test Study Manual for the Test of Essential Academic Skills (TEAS). "ATI" stands for the Assessment Technologies Institute. ** *Example A: *See Page 175, Item #19 Original: The building which was a firetrap was torn down. Corrected: The building, which was a firetrap, was torn down. ** *Example B:* See Page 175, Item #23 Original: We expect them moment arily. Corrected: We expect them moment- arily. [This is supposed to be an example of correct syllabication.] *Example C: *See Page 175, Item #26 Original: May I interrupt you for a moment? Corrected: May I interrupt you for a moment. [Reason given is that the imperative requires a period rather than a question mark.] *Example D: *See Page 178, Example #1: A teacher's work (it has often been spoken), begins when the dismissal bell rings. [This is offered as an example of good English usage. Note the punctuation.] *Example E: *See Page 184, Item #12 Original: On Saturdays, the cooking is done by me and the laundry is done by my sister. Corrected: Saturdays, I do the cooking and my sister does the laundry. ***Example F: *See Page 190, Item #9 Original: Mr. Thomas was fired from Washington High because so many students failed the exam. This was unfortunate. Corrected: It is unfortunate Mr. Thomas was fired from Washington High because so many students failed the exam. [Reason given is that the referent is ambiguous for "This" in the second sentence of the original. Is the corrected version much better, though?] *Example G: *See Page 191, Item #11 Original: The meeting lasted all day, and nothing was accomplished. Corrected: The meeting lasted all day, however nothing was accomplished. [Reason given is that in the first sentence two ideas of unequal importance were joined by a coordinating conjunction. Can you believe the corrected version?] To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/