I believe that the distinction depends upon whether the particle in question can be shifted without violating English idiomatic structure. She put on her hat = she put her hat on. "She drooled" on her bib" does not become "She drooled her bib on" in idiomatic English. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of ATEG automatic digest system Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 12:00 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: ATEG Digest - 24 May 2008 to 25 May 2008 (#2008-116) There are 2 messages totalling 1775 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements (2) To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 19:11:22 -0700 From: Cynthia Baird <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements --0-1414580691-1211767882=:33511 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This might be a little off topic, but Bill's response brought to mind somet= hing that I have always struggled with. =20 In traditional high school sentence diagramming, how does one diagram a pre= positional phrase following verbs like "put" or "turn" which are always fol= lowed with what I was taught are verb particles. For example, Turn up= /off the radio. or Turn off the lights. or She put on her clothes. I = don't see the prepositional phrase as being truly adverbial, but that's alw= ays how high school textbooks diagram them. Is there a way to diagram= a verb particle? Can the particle be part of the verb followed by a = direct object (radio, clothes, etc.)? thanks! --- On Mon, 5/19/08, Spruiell, William C <[log in to unmask]> wrote: From: Spruiell, William C <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements To: [log in to unmask] Date: Monday, May 19, 2008, 11:12 AM The traditional approach of ruling out prepositional phrases as subject com= plements is partly, I think, a relic of the =93word-based=94 focus of prett= y much all grammar up until the twentieth century. That is, an actual =93ob= ject=94 or =93complement=94 had to be a word =96 and in older systems a =93= substantive.=94 That category could include nouns and adjectives, so adject= ival subject complements were no problem. With prepositional phrases, thoug= h, the nominal part was considered to be the object of the preposition, and= it could not simultaneously be the object of a preposition *and* the compl= ement of a verb. Saying that the PP as a whole is the complement, rather th= an the NP inside it, solves the problem nicely, but the traditional system = never quite made it that far with subject complements, although it did with= (for example) acknowledging noun clauses as direct objects. I can=92t see much of an argument other than tradition for ruling out PPs a= s SCs. Yes, there are semantic limitations on them, but that=92s true of re= gular SCs as well. It=92s difficult to set up a situation in which =93My ca= t is tangential=94 or =93The chief of staff is the twelfth century=94 work = very well. Locational PPs work well primarily as SCs to=85.well, locations.= Acknowledging PPs as complements also lets you deal more systematically wi= th the verb =93put,=94 since otherwise you=92re stuck explaining why that = =93adverbial PP=94 is not only mandatory, but hard to move. Bill Spruiell Dept. of English=20 Central Michigan University From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask] OHIO.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha Kolln Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:43 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements I certainly agree, Dick, that these adverbials have limitations. Time= adverbials are limited, I suspect, to events. Martha Martha, We probably should make a distinction between time/place adverbials that ar= e complementary (describing the subject) and those that are non-complementa= ry (purely adverbial, describing the predicate). For example, in your sente= nce "The car is here now," "here" is complementary but "now" is not. = We can say "The car is here," but we can't say "The car is now." Likewise the sentence "Emma was at the beach after final exams" allow us to= say "Emma was at the beach," but it doesn't allow us to say "Emma was afte= r final exams." "At the beach" is an adverbial that complements the subject= (answers "Where was Emma?). "After final exams" is a non-complementary adv= erbial (answers "When was Emma at the beach?" rather than "When was Emma?")= . Dick ________________________________ Richard Veit Department of English University of North Carolina Wilmington From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask] OHIO.EDU] On Behalf Of Martha Kolln Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:58 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements Hi Patty, In traditional grammar, be is classified as a linking verb. That syst= em leaves out sentences like Peter's second one, "Deb was in her car," = ; where what follows be is an adverbial. This is a pattern that , in my grammar book, I identify as "NP be ADV= /TP"--where be is followed by an adverbial of time or place, rather than by= a subject complement. Such adverbials are often prepositional phrase= s. Here are some other examples: =20 Deb was there. =20 The car is here now. =20 The party will be tomorrow. =20 The election was on Tuesday. These "completers" of the predicate don't describe or rename the subject, a= s Peter's first example does. "Cornelia was in a bad mood" is another way o= f saying "Cornelia was cranky." I suppose you could call the adverbia= l completers complements, but they aren't subject complements as adjectival= s and nominals are. And note too that the adverbials that complete be sentences are limited to = time or place; adverbials of manner, for example, don't work here. It= 's not that we can't say "Deb was quickly"--it's just that we don't. Martha Sincere question, here: Would it be OK/accurate to say that, in the first sentence, "in a bad mood" is a prepositional phrase functioning adjectivally, where in the second sentence, "in her car" is more of an adverbial function? Tell the truth, I'm not sure how to classify "location" as a subject complement. My thinking is: how would I explain this to students, who might not have ha= d the exposure to this grammar list? -patty -----Original Message----- From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Adams Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:56 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements How would you categorize the prep phrase, "in a bad mood," in a sentence like the following? Cornelia was in a bad mood. How about the prep phrase "in her car" in the following sentence? Deb was in her car. Peter Adams To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface = at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface = at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave= the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV li= st, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/ar= chives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface = at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave= the list"=20 Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/To join or leave this LISTSERV lis= t, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/arc= hives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"=20 Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ =0A=0A=0A To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --0-1414580691-1211767882=:33511 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <table cellspacing=3D'0' cellpadding=3D'0' border=3D'0' background=3D'none'= style=3D'font-family:arial;font-size:10pt;color:#000000;background-color:#= ffffff;width:100%;'><tr><td valign=3D'top' style=3D'font: inherit;'><P>This= might be a little off topic, but Bill's response brought to mind something= that I have always struggled with. </P> <P> </P> <P>In traditional high school sentence diagramming, how does one diagram a = prepositional phrase following verbs like "put" or "turn" which are always = followed with what I was taught are verb particles. For example, Turn= up/off the radio. or Turn off the lights. or She put on her clothes. = I don't see the prepositional phrase as being truly adverbial, but that's = always how high school textbooks diagram them. Is there a way to diag= ram a verb particle? Can the particle be part of the verb followed by= a direct object (radio, clothes, etc.)?</P> <P> </P> <P>thanks!<BR><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 5/19/08, Spruiell, William C <I><sprui1= [log in to unmask]></I></B> wrote:<BR></P> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(= 16,16,255) 2px solid">From: Spruiell, William C <[log in to unmask]><= BR>Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements<BR>To: ATEG@LI= STSERV.MUOHIO.EDU<BR>Date: Monday, May 19, 2008, 11:12 AM<BR><BR> <DIV id=3Dyiv421543358> <STYLE> <!-- _filtered #yiv421543358 {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6= 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv421543358 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4= ;} _filtered #yiv421543358 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;= } #yiv421543358 /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal,#yiv421543358 li.MsoNormal,#yiv421543358 div.MsoNormal =09{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times Ne= w Roman", "serif";} #yiv421543358 a:link,#yiv421543358 span.MsoHyperlink =09{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;} #yiv421543358 a:visited,#yiv421543358 span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed =09{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;} #yiv421543358 p =09{margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times Ne= w Roman", "serif";} #yiv421543358 span.EmailStyle18 =09{font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;} #yiv421543358 .MsoChpDefault =09{font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv421543358 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} #yiv421543358 div.Section1 =09{} --> </STYLE> <DIV class=3DSection1> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'">The traditional approach of ruling out prep= ositional phrases as subject complements is partly, I think, a relic of the= =93word-based=94 focus of pretty much all grammar up until the twentieth c= entury. That is, an actual =93object=94 or =93complement=94 had to be a wor= d =96 and in older systems a =93substantive.=94 That category could include= nouns and adjectives, so adjectival subject complements were no problem. W= ith prepositional phrases, though, the nominal part was considered to be th= e object of the preposition, and it could not simultaneously be the object = of a preposition *<B>and</B>* the complement of a verb. Saying that the PP = as a whole is the complement, rather than the NP inside it, solves the prob= lem nicely, but the traditional system never quite made it that far with su= bject complements, although it did with (for example) acknowledging noun clauses as direct objects.</SPAN></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'"> </SPAN></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'">I can=92t see much of an argument <I>other = than</I> tradition for ruling out PPs as SCs. Yes, there are semantic limit= ations on them, but that=92s true of regular SCs as well. It=92s difficult = to set up a situation in which =93My cat is tangential=94 or =93The chief o= f staff is the twelfth century=94 work very well. Locational PPs work well = primarily as SCs to=85.well, locations. Acknowledging PPs as complements al= so lets you deal more systematically with the verb =93put,=94 since otherwi= se you=92re stuck explaining why that =93adverbial PP=94 is not only mandat= ory, but hard to move.</SPAN></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'"> </SPAN></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'">Bill Spruiell</SPAN></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'">Dept. of English </SPAN></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'">Central Michigan University</SPAN></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-F= AMILY: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif'"> </SPAN></P> <DIV> <DIV style=3D"BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b= 5c4df 1pt solid; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: mediu= m none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahom= a', 'sans-serif'">From:</SPAN></B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMI= LY: 'Tahoma', 'sans-serif'"> Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [= mailto:[log in to unmask]] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Martha Kolln<BR><B>Sen= t:</B> Friday, May 16, 2008 4:43 PM<BR><B>To:</B> [log in to unmask]<= BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements</SPAN><= /P></DIV></DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal>I certainly agree, Dick, that these adverbials have li= mitations. Time adverbials are limited, I suspect, to events.</P></DI= V> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal>Martha</P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy">Martha,</= SPAN></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"> </S= PAN></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy">We probab= ly should make a distinction between time/place adverbials that are<I> comp= lementary</I> (describing the subject) and those that are<I> non-complement= ary</I> (purely adverbial, describing the predicate). For example, in your = sentence "The car is here now," "here" is complementary but "now" is = not. We can say "The car is here," but we can't say "The car is now." = </SPAN></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"> </S= PAN></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy">Likewise = the sentence "Emma was at the beach after final exams" allow us to say "Emm= a was at the beach," but it doesn't allow us to say "Emma was after final e= xams." "At the beach" is an adverbial that complements the subject (answers= "Where was Emma?). "After final exams" is a non-complementary adverbial (a= nswers "When was Emma at the beach?" rather than "When was Emma?").</SPAN><= /P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy"> </S= PAN></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy">Dick</SPA= N></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: teal">_________= _______________________</SPAN></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: teal">Richard V= eit<BR>Department of English<BR>University of North Carolina Wilmington</SP= AN></P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <DIV class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=3Dcenter> <HR align=3Dcenter width=3D"100%" SIZE=3D2> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahom= a', 'sans-serif'">From:</SPAN></B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMI= LY: 'Tahoma', 'sans-serif'"> Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [= mailto:[log in to unmask]]<B> On Behalf Of</B> Martha Kolln<BR><B>Sen= t:</B> Friday, May 16, 2008 2:58 PM<BR><B>To:</B> [log in to unmask]<= BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements</SPAN><= /P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>Hi Patty,</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>In traditional grammar,<I> be</I> is classified as a l= inking verb. That system leaves out sentences like Peter's second one= , "Deb was in her car," where what follows<I> be</I> is an adverbial.= </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>This is a pattern that , in my grammar book, I identif= y as "NP be ADV/TP"--where<I> be</I> is followed by an adverbial of t= ime or place, rather than by a subject complement. Such adverbials ar= e often prepositional phrases. Here are some other examples:</P></BLO= CKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCK= QUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> Deb was the= re.</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCK= QUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> The car is = here now.</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCK= QUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> The party w= ill be tomorrow.</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCK= QUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> The electio= n was on Tuesday.</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>These "completers" of the predicate don't describe or = rename the subject, as Peter's first example does. "Cornelia was in a bad m= ood" is another way of saying "Cornelia was cranky." I suppose you co= uld call the adverbial completers complements, but they aren't subject comp= lements as adjectivals and nominals are.</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>And note too that the adverbials that complete<I> be</= I> sentences are limited to time or place; adverbials of manner, for exampl= e, don't work here. It's not that we can't say "Deb was quickly"--it'= s just that we don't.</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>Martha</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> <BR><BR></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal>Sincere question, here:<BR><BR>Would it be OK/accurate= to say that, in the first sentence, "in a bad mood"<BR>is a prepositional = phrase functioning adjectivally, where in the second<BR>sentence, "in her c= ar" is more of an adverbial function?<BR><BR>Tell the truth, I'm not sure h= ow to classify "location" as a subject<BR>complement.<BR><BR>My thinking is= : how would I explain this to students, who might not have had<BR>the expos= ure to this grammar list?<BR><BR>-patty<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<B= R>From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar<BR>[mailto:ATEG@LISTSE= RV.MUOHIO.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Adams<BR>Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:5= 6 PM<BR>To: [log in to unmask]<BR>Subject: Prepositional Phrases as S= ubject Complements<BR><BR>How would you categorize the prep phrase, "in a b= ad mood," in a <BR>sentence like the following?<BR><BR>Cornelia was in= a bad mood.<BR><BR>How about the prep phrase "in her car" in the following sentence?<BR><BR>Deb was in her car.<BR><BR><BR><BR>Peter Adams<= BR><BR>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web int= erface<BR>at:<BR> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archiv= es/ateg.html<BR>and select "Join or leave the list"<BR><BR>Visit ATEG's web= site at http://ateg.org/<BR><BR>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, pleas= e visit the list's web interface at:<BR> http://lis= tserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html<BR>and select "Join or leave the list"<= BR><BR>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the = list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and = select "Join or leave the list"</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or l= eave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://l= istserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"</= P></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt"> <P class=3DMsoNormal>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/</P></BLOCKQU= OTE> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal> </P></DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the = list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and = select "Join or leave the list" </P> <P>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/</P></DIV>To join or leave this= LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.m= uohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"=20 <P>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ </P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></= tr></table><br>=0A=0A To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" <p> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --0-1414580691-1211767882=:33511-- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 22:45:58 -0400 From: Nancy Tuten <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00BB_01C8BEB9.19D58530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cynthia, I always put the particle on the line with the verb. I thought that when a word that us usually a preposition functions as a particle, then we don't have a prepositional phrase at all (because we don't really have a preposition). I will be interested to see if I've been teaching this idea correctly or not, but I teach my students that a verb phrase that includes a particle would mean something entirely different without the particle and that a one-word verb can usually replace the verb phrase. For example, "to turn off" is an entirely different action than "to turn," and "to turn off" can be replaced by "to extinguish." Once we have applied those tests and determined that we have a particle, I no longer call it a preposition. The word that would have been the object of the preposition is now the direct object. Eagerly awaiting the others' feedback . . . Nancy Nancy L. Tuten, PhD Professor of English Director of the Writing-across-the-Curriculum Program Columbia College Columbia, South Carolina <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] 803-786-3706 From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cynthia Baird Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:11 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements This might be a little off topic, but Bill's response brought to mind something that I have always struggled with. In traditional high school sentence diagramming, how does one diagram a prepositional phrase following verbs like "put" or "turn" which are always followed with what I was taught are verb particles. For example, Turn up/off the radio. or Turn off the lights. or She put on her clothes. I don't see the prepositional phrase as being truly adverbial, but that's always how high school textbooks diagram them. Is there a way to diagram a verb particle? Can the particle be part of the verb followed by a direct object (radio, clothes, etc.)? thanks! --- On Mon, 5/19/08, Spruiell, William C <[log in to unmask]> wrote: From: Spruiell, William C <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements To: [log in to unmask] Date: Monday, May 19, 2008, 11:12 AM The traditional approach of ruling out prepositional phrases as subject complements is partly, I think, a relic of the "word-based" focus of pretty much all grammar up until the twentieth century. That is, an actual "object" or "complement" had to be a word - and in older systems a "substantive." That category could include nouns and adjectives, so adjectival subject complements were no problem. With prepositional phrases, though, the nominal part was considered to be the object of the preposition, and it could not simultaneously be the object of a preposition *and* the complement of a verb. Saying that the PP as a whole is the complement, rather than the NP inside it, solves the problem nicely, but the traditional system never quite made it that far with subject complements, although it did with (for example) acknowledging noun clauses as direct objects. I can't see much of an argument other than tradition for ruling out PPs as SCs. Yes, there are semantic limitations on them, but that's true of regular SCs as well. It's difficult to set up a situation in which "My cat is tangential" or "The chief of staff is the twelfth century" work very well. Locational PPs work well primarily as SCs to..well, locations. Acknowledging PPs as complements also lets you deal more systematically with the verb "put," since otherwise you're stuck explaining why that "adverbial PP" is not only mandatory, but hard to move. Bill Spruiell Dept. of English Central Michigan University From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Martha Kolln Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:43 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements I certainly agree, Dick, that these adverbials have limitations. Time adverbials are limited, I suspect, to events. Martha Martha, We probably should make a distinction between time/place adverbials that are complementary (describing the subject) and those that are non-complementary (purely adverbial, describing the predicate). For example, in your sentence "The car is here now," "here" is complementary but "now" is not. We can say "The car is here," but we can't say "The car is now." Likewise the sentence "Emma was at the beach after final exams" allow us to say "Emma was at the beach," but it doesn't allow us to say "Emma was after final exams." "At the beach" is an adverbial that complements the subject (answers "Where was Emma?). "After final exams" is a non-complementary adverbial (answers "When was Emma at the beach?" rather than "When was Emma?"). Dick ________________________________ Richard Veit Department of English University of North Carolina Wilmington _____ From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Martha Kolln Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:58 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements Hi Patty, In traditional grammar, be is classified as a linking verb. That system leaves out sentences like Peter's second one, "Deb was in her car," where what follows be is an adverbial. This is a pattern that , in my grammar book, I identify as "NP be ADV/TP"--where be is followed by an adverbial of time or place, rather than by a subject complement. Such adverbials are often prepositional phrases. Here are some other examples: Deb was there. The car is here now. The party will be tomorrow. The election was on Tuesday. These "completers" of the predicate don't describe or rename the subject, as Peter's first example does. "Cornelia was in a bad mood" is another way of saying "Cornelia was cranky." I suppose you could call the adverbial completers complements, but they aren't subject complements as adjectivals and nominals are. And note too that the adverbials that complete be sentences are limited to time or place; adverbials of manner, for example, don't work here. It's not that we can't say "Deb was quickly"--it's just that we don't. Martha Sincere question, here: Would it be OK/accurate to say that, in the first sentence, "in a bad mood" is a prepositional phrase functioning adjectivally, where in the second sentence, "in her car" is more of an adverbial function? Tell the truth, I'm not sure how to classify "location" as a subject complement. My thinking is: how would I explain this to students, who might not have had the exposure to this grammar list? -patty -----Original Message----- From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Adams Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:56 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements How would you categorize the prep phrase, "in a bad mood," in a sentence like the following? Cornelia was in a bad mood. How about the prep phrase "in her car" in the following sentence? Deb was in her car. Peter Adams To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ------=_NextPart_000_00BB_01C8BEB9.19D58530 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"> <!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]--> <style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Georgia; panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} p {mso-style-priority:99; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} p.msochpdefault, li.msochpdefault, div.msochpdefault {mso-style-name:msochpdefault; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} span.emailstyle18 {mso-style-name:emailstyle18;} span.emailstyle181 {mso-style-name:emailstyle181; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} p.msochpdefault1, li.msochpdefault1, div.msochpdefault1 {mso-style-name:msochpdefault1; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} span.EmailStyle22 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; color:windowtext; font-weight:normal; font-style:normal; text-decoration:none none;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style> <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--> </head> <body lang=3DEN-US link=3D"#000000" vlink=3D"#000000"> <div class=3DSection1> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'>Cynthia,<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'>I always put the = particle on the line with the verb. I thought that when a word that us usually a preposition functions as a particle, then we don’t have a = prepositional phrase at all (because we don’t really have a preposition). I will = be interested to see if I’ve been teaching this idea correctly or = not, but I teach my students that a verb phrase that includes a particle would mean something entirely different without the particle and that a one-word = verb can usually replace the verb phrase. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'>For example, = “to turn off” is an entirely different action than “to turn,” = and “to turn off” can be replaced by “to = extinguish.”<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'>Once we have = applied those tests and determined that we have a particle, I no longer call it a preposition. The word that would have been the object of the preposition = is now the direct object. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'>Eagerly awaiting = the others’ feedback . . . <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'>Nancy = <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-family:"Georgia","serif"'>Nancy = L. Tuten, PhD</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-family:"Georgia","serif"'>Professor of English</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-family:"Georgia","serif"'>Director of the Writing-across-the-Curriculum Program</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-family:"Georgia","serif"'>Columbia = College</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-family:"Georgia","serif"'>Columbia, South Carolina</span><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><a href=3D"mailto:[log in to unmask]"><u><span style=3D'font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black'>[log in to unmask]</= span></u></a><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-family:"Georgia","serif"'>803-786-3706</span><o:p></o:p></p= > <p class=3DMsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal> <span = style=3D'font-size:13.0pt'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt = 0in 0in 0in'> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><b><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Cynthia = Baird<br> <b>Sent:</b> Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:11 PM<br> <b>To:</b> [log in to unmask]<br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject = Complements<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><o:p> </o:p></p> <table class=3DMsoNormalTable border=3D0 cellspacing=3D0 cellpadding=3D0 = width=3D"100%" style=3D'width:100.0%;margin-left:.5in;background:white'> <tr> <td valign=3Dtop style=3D'padding:0in 0in 0in 0in'> <p><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>T= his might be a little off topic, but Bill's response brought to mind = something that I have always struggled with. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>&= nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>I= n traditional high school sentence diagramming, how does one diagram a prepositional phrase following verbs like "put" or = "turn" which are always followed with what I was taught are verb = particles. For example, Turn up/off the radio. or Turn off the lights. or She put = on her clothes. I don't see the prepositional phrase as being truly = adverbial, but that's always how high school textbooks diagram them. Is = there a way to diagram a verb particle? Can the particle be part of the = verb followed by a direct object (radio, clothes, = etc.)?<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>&= nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>t= hanks!<br> <br> --- On <b>Mon, 5/19/08, Spruiell, William C = <i><[log in to unmask]></i></b> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p> <blockquote style=3D'border:none;border-left:solid #1010FF = 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt; margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>From: Spruiell, William = C <[log in to unmask]><br> Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements<br> To: [log in to unmask]<br> Date: Monday, May 19, 2008, 11:12 AM<o:p></o:p></span></p> <div id=3Dyiv421543358> <div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'>The traditional approach of ruling out prepositional phrases as subject complements is partly, I think, a relic of the = “word-based” focus of pretty much all grammar up until the twentieth century. That is, an = actual “object” or “complement” had to be a word = – and in older systems a “substantive.” That category could = include nouns and adjectives, so adjectival subject complements were no = problem. With prepositional phrases, though, the nominal part was considered to be = the object of the preposition, and it could not simultaneously be the = object of a preposition *<b>and</b>* the complement of a verb. Saying that the PP = as a whole is the complement, rather than the NP inside it, solves the = problem nicely, but the traditional system never quite made it that far with = subject complements, although it did with (for example) acknowledging noun = clauses as direct objects.</span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'> </span><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'>I can’t see much of an argument <i>other than</i> tradition for = ruling out PPs as SCs. Yes, there are semantic limitations on them, but = that’s true of regular SCs as well. It’s difficult to set up a = situation in which “My cat is tangential” or “The chief of staff = is the twelfth century” work very well. Locational PPs work well = primarily as SCs to….well, locations. Acknowledging PPs as complements also = lets you deal more systematically with the verb “put,” since = otherwise you’re stuck explaining why that “adverbial PP” is = not only mandatory, but hard to move.</span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'> </span><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'>Bill Spruiell</span><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'>Dept. of English </span><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'>Central Michigan University</span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497= D'> </span><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> <div> <div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt = 0in 0in 0in'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black'>= From:</span></b><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black'>= Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] = <b>On Behalf Of </b>Martha Kolln<br> <b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 16, 2008 4:43 PM<br> <b>To:</b> [log in to unmask]<br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject = Complements</span><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> </div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> <div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>I certainly agree, Dick, that these adverbials = have limitations. Time adverbials are limited, I suspect, to = events.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>Martha<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'>Martha,</span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'> </span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'>We probably should make a = distinction between time/place adverbials that are<i> complementary</i> = (describing the subject) and those that are<i> non-complementary</i> (purely = adverbial, describing the predicate). For example, in your sentence "The car = is here now," "here" is complementary but = "now" is not. We can say "The car is here," but we can't say = "The car is now." </span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'> </span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'>Likewise the sentence "Emma = was at the beach after final exams" allow us to say "Emma was at = the beach," but it doesn't allow us to say "Emma was after final exams." "At the beach" is an adverbial that complements = the subject (answers "Where was Emma?). "After final exams" = is a non-complementary adverbial (answers "When was Emma at the = beach?" rather than "When was Emma?").</span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'> </span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'>Dick</span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:teal'>________________________________</s= pan><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:teal'>Richard Veit<br> Department of English<br> University of North Carolina Wilmington</span><span = style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter = style=3D'text-align:center'><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'> <hr size=3D2 width=3D"100%" align=3Dcenter> </span></div> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black'>= From:</span></b><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black'>= Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<b> On Behalf Of</b> Martha Kolln<br> <b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 16, 2008 2:58 PM<br> <b>To:</b> [log in to unmask]<br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject = Complements</span><span style=3D'color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>Hi Patty,<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>In traditional grammar,<i> be</i> is classified = as a linking verb. That system leaves out sentences like Peter's = second one, "Deb was in her car," where what follows<i> be</i> is = an adverbial.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>This is a pattern that , in my grammar book, I = identify as "NP be ADV/TP"--where<i> be</i> is followed by an adverbial of time or place, rather than by a subject complement. = Such adverbials are often prepositional phrases. Here are some other examples:<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> = <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> Deb = was there.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> = <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> The = car is here now.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> = <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> The = party will be tomorrow.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> = <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> The = election was on Tuesday.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>These "completers" of the predicate = don't describe or rename the subject, as Peter's first example does. = "Cornelia was in a bad mood" is another way of saying "Cornelia was cranky." I suppose you could call the adverbial completers complements, but they aren't subject complements as adjectivals and = nominals are.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>And note too that the adverbials that = complete<i> be</i> sentences are limited to time or place; adverbials of manner, for = example, don't work here. It's not that we can't say "Deb was quickly"--it's just that we don't.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>Martha<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>Sincere question, here:<br> <br> Would it be OK/accurate to say that, in the first sentence, "in a = bad mood"<br> is a prepositional phrase functioning adjectivally, where in the = second<br> sentence, "in her car" is more of an adverbial function?<br> <br> Tell the truth, I'm not sure how to classify "location" as a subject<br> complement.<br> <br> My thinking is: how would I explain this to students, who might not = have had<br> the exposure to this grammar list?<br> <br> -patty<br> <br> -----Original Message-----<br> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar<br> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Adams<br> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:56 PM<br> To: [log in to unmask]<br> Subject: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements<br> <br> How would you categorize the prep phrase, "in a bad mood," = in a <br> sentence like the following?<br> <br> Cornelia was in a bad mood.<br> <br> How about the prep phrase "in her car" in the following = sentence?<br> <br> Deb was in her car.<br> <br> <br> <br> Peter Adams<br> <br> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web = interface<br> at:<br> = http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html<br> and select "Join or leave the list"<br> <br> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/<br> <br> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web = interface at:<br> = http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html<br> and select "Join or leave the list"<br> <br> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please = visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html = and select "Join or leave the list"<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To = join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or = leave the list"<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>Visit ATEG's web site at = http://ateg.org/<o:p></o:p></span></p> </blockquote> <div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style=3D'color:black'>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please = visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html = and select "Join or leave the list" <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>V= isit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; color:black'>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the = list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>V= isit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> </blockquote> </td> </tr> </table> <p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-left:.5in'><span = style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'><br> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web = interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or = leave the list" <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p style=3D'margin-left:.5in'>Visit ATEG's web site at = http://ateg.org/<o:p></o:p></p> </div> </body> </html> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" <p> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ------=_NextPart_000_00BB_01C8BEB9.19D58530-- ------------------------------ End of ATEG Digest - 24 May 2008 to 25 May 2008 (#2008-116) *********************************************************** To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/