Martha,
We probably should make a distinction between time/place adverbials that
are complementary (describing the subject) and those that are
non-complementary (purely adverbial, describing the predicate). For
example, in your sentence "The car is here now," "here" is
complementary but "now" is not. We can say "The car is here," but we
can't say "The car is now."
Likewise the sentence "Emma was at the beach after final exams" allow us
to say "Emma was at the beach," but it doesn't allow us to say "Emma was
after final exams." "At the beach" is an adverbial that complements the
subject (answers "Where was Emma?). "After final exams" is a
non-complementary adverbial (answers "When was Emma at the beach?"
rather than "When was Emma?").
Dick
________________________________
Richard Veit
Department of English
University of North Carolina Wilmington
________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Martha Kolln
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements
Hi Patty,
In traditional grammar, be is classified as a linking verb. That system
leaves out sentences like Peter's second one, "Deb was in her car,"
where what follows be is an adverbial.
This is a pattern that , in my grammar book, I identify as "NP be
ADV/TP"--where be is followed by an adverbial of time or place, rather
than by a subject complement. Such adverbials are often prepositional
phrases. Here are some other examples:
Deb was there.
The car is here now.
The party will be tomorrow.
The election was on Tuesday.
These "completers" of the predicate don't describe or rename the
subject, as Peter's first example does. "Cornelia was in a bad mood" is
another way of saying "Cornelia was cranky." I suppose you could call
the adverbial completers complements, but they aren't subject
complements as adjectivals and nominals are.
And note too that the adverbials that complete be sentences are limited
to time or place; adverbials of manner, for example, don't work here.
It's not that we can't say "Deb was quickly"--it's just that we don't.
Martha
Sincere question, here:
Would it be OK/accurate to say that, in the first sentence, "in
a bad mood"
is a prepositional phrase functioning adjectivally, where in the
second
sentence, "in her car" is more of an adverbial function?
Tell the truth, I'm not sure how to classify "location" as a
subject
complement.
My thinking is: how would I explain this to students, who might
not have had
the exposure to this grammar list?
-patty
-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Adams
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:56 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Prepositional Phrases as Subject Complements
How would you categorize the prep phrase, "in a bad mood," in a
sentence like the following?
Cornelia was in a bad mood.
How about the prep phrase "in her car" in the following
sentence?
Deb was in her car.
Peter Adams
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface
at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select
"Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/