Marshall,
 
I have wrecked my brain but have not yet thought of a valid reason why 'had' should appear other than in the three circumstances mentioned. Have you a suggestion?
 
.brad.20nov08.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~

On Tue, 11/18/08, Myers, Marshall <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 

Brad,

 

How are they in “error”?

 

Marshall

 

~~~~~~~~~~~

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar

On Behalf Of Brad Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Norman Mailer

 

Of 300+ ATEGians, some few will be interested to know that in the first 21 pages of "The Executioner's Song", for which Norman Mailer won a Pulitzer in 1980, the word 'had' appears 98 times, of which 44 are used correctly as the past tense of the verb "to have", or in the past perfect, or in the subjunctive. The rest (54) are in error.

 

(Don't holler at me. Count 'em for yourself :)

 

.brad.18nov08


To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/