This looks like a good example of why we need to carefully
distinguish “colloquial” from “ungrammatical.” I advise students to switch to
the canonical passive in formal writing, but I view that as stylistic advice,
not as a grammatical injunction.
As a side note on your analogy: Given the frequency with which
helping verbs pair up with main verbs, I would expect a very, very large set of
illegitimate offspring. It’s one of the many grey areas in grammar, and perhaps
we should adjust to modernity and legalize grey marriage in this case.
Sincerely,
Bill Spruiell
From: Assembly for the
Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brad
Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: query on the use of the word got
--- On Tue, 3/24/09, Castilleja, Janet <[log in to unmask]>
wrote: I tell my students that ‘got’ is
the illegitimate child of the helping verb family. You go on to explain that they should not use it
when writing Standard English, don't you? You tell 'em, "My dog was killed by the
car", when they write about it, don't you? Sure you do. There IS
something that can be done about it. 'Tain't hopelus uh'tall, even in
Chicago. From: Castilleja, Janet
<[log in to unmask]>
From: Assembly for the
Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Ciervo , Frank Isn’t
this a good example of very poor usage? Unless my memory is very bad , it
would have been cause for points off in my freshmen composition class. A sad
commentary on the state of news writing in 2009 But
Farley noted that bill sponsor Assemblyman Peter Abbate Jr. , D-Brooklyn,
hasn’t yet gotten a Democrat to introduce the bill in the Senate. The
Democrats won control of the Senate this year. |
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave
the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/