I just happened to look at White's own use of linking verbs in  
"Elements," Chapter 5, "An Approach to Style."  Here are some of the  
main verbs in his first paragraph:
    is, are, are, are, is, is, be, are
And here are all the main verbs in paragraph three:
    is, speak, mean, mean, use, reveal, is, is, is, is, remains
Long live "be," we can't write without it.

Ed S

    

On Apr 17, 2009, at 10:58 PM, STAHLKE, HERBERT F wrote:

> Different types of verb fulfill different functions in discourse,  
> and, while linking verbs can get overused, just as passive voice  
> can, they exist in language because language needs them to  
> communicate effectively.  I suspect coaching writers on how to use  
> linking verbs effectively would produce better writing—and writers— 
> than banning them.
>
> Herb
>
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask] 
> ] On Behalf Of Linda Comerford
> Sent: 2009-04-17 19:05
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15  
> Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
>
> Much to my dismay, I used to recommend using adjectives and adverbs  
> for more colorful writing--until I learned that the two most  
> powerful parts of speech are the subject and the verb.  Now, I  
> emphasize using active versus linking verbs.  When I used to teach  
> at our local university, one of the professors used to give his  
> students an assignment of writing a paragraph without any linking  
> verbs.  Although the students struggled with it, they valued their  
> resulting learning from it.  I'm now a true fan of active verbs!   
> (Ooops, I just noticed I used a contracted form of a linking verb in  
> my previous sentence.)
>
> Linda
>
>
> Linda Comerford
> Comerford Consulting
> 317.786.6404
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> www.comerfordconsulting.com
>
>
>
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask] 
> ] On Behalf Of Paul E. Doniger
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 6:44 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15  
> Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
> For the record, although I never analyzed this in any statistical or  
> methodical way, many of my (high school - honors level) students'  
> papers seem to run into trouble when they get carried away by  
> adjectives and adverbs (I'm talking about academic, not creative  
> writing here). I wonder if anyone else has any experience with this.
>
>
> Paul D.
>
>
> "If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an  
> improbable fiction" (_Twelfth Night_ 3.4.127-128).
>
>
> From: Craig Hancock <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:05:43 AM
> Subject: Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15  
> Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
>
> Bill, Scott,
>   If the corpus grammars tell it accurately, writing with nouns and  
> verbs is good advice for fiction (Biber found a negative correlation  
> for attributive adjectives), but not for journalism or academic  
> writing, which build lots of meaning into the noun phrases. Of   
> course, saying adjectives should be used sparingly is not the same  
> as saying they are unimportant. The lone adjective may be the most  
> important word in the sentence. But English teachers especially seem  
> to equate literacy with literature.
>   I thought Pullum was a bit arrogant in the review, a bit  
> disrespectful of the writing teacher's perspective. And it may very  
> well be that linguists are much to blame for not giving us a  
> discourse friendly grammar to work with. There's some good advice in  
> the little book, but enough problems to negate that out. I usually  
> tell students who own the book not to pay attention to anything but  
> the style sections.
>
> Craig
> Spruiell, William C wrote:
> > Scott:
> >
> > I've had similar students --- but the advice they need is more  
> along the
> > lines of, "use specific nouns, not fluffy ones." The problem really
> > isn't the adjectives and adverbs. And at least some of those  
> students
> > aren't deliberately being verbose, or displaying signs of functional
> > illiteracy (they probably know a fair number of highly specific
> > nouns...but they're part of the students' passive vocabulary, rather
> > than being part of the active pool that is deployed when writing).
> > Instead, they've adopted a common strategy of marking out a  
> general area
> > with the noun and then using modifiers to home in on a particular  
> spot
> > in within it.
> > In fact, it's the same thing professional writers do when they  
> come out
> > with sentences such as "The fact that these results have been  
> observed
> > indicates that the phenomenon is real." "Fact" is fluffy -- but  
> since I
> > know the genre, I know when I can get away with using it (if that
> > sentence bothers you, all I can say is that amazing numbers of  
> articles
> > have been published with near-equivalents). Students pick up on that
> > kind of practice, but they don't yet have enough exposure to  
> scientific
> > genre to know which words can be used in particular cases without  
> coming
> > across as "gauche."
> >
> > This simply highlights one of Pullum's points: One of S&W's major
> > injunctions is that writers should be clear and concise, but they  
> wrote
> > THEIR OWN RULE in a way that attacked a side effect of the actual
> > problem rather than the problem itself, and implied there was  
> something
> > wrong with entire classes of words that are only problematic when
> > they're used as part of a compensation mechanism. It's as if I  
> watched
> > someone using glue to connect two pieces of wood that should instead
> > have been nailed together, and then proclaimed that glue is a bad  
> thing.
> > I'd probably figure out my mistake once I saw people trying to nail
> > wallpaper.
> >
> > Bill Spruiell
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Scott
> > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 1:08 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15  
> Apr
> > 2009 (#2009-86)
> >
> > Pulliam is the stupid one if he does not understand what The  
> Little Book
> > means by "Write with nouns and verbs, not with adjectives and  
> adverbs," they
> > insist.
> > (The motivation of this mysterious decree remains unclear to me.)
> >
> > Anyone who had ever graded English themes, especially descriptive
> > writing,
> > has been exposed to students who use plain verbs and generic  
> nouns, both
> > of
> > which are accompanied by a plethora of adverbs and adjectives
> > respectively
> > when more descriptive verbs and nouns would do a far better job with
> > less
> > effort.  The only explanation that I can give for such students is
> > either
> > functional illiteracy or sheer laziness (many theme assignments  
> have--or
> > used to have--a minimum number of words).  The slovenly among them  
> use
> > any
> > gimmick to expand their impoverished thoughts and expression.
> >
> > I cannot believe that Professor Pulliam has taught English without
> > having
> > encountered such students: his extreme prejudice towards The  
> Little Book
> > seems to have blinded him to the extent that he can only see vices  
> and
> > never
> > virtue.  The Little Book has its faults; however, I would trust  
> Shrunk
> > and
> > White over a "grammarian" who has had too little contact with  
> writing to
> > understand the motivation for the very sound advice:
> >
> > "Write with nouns and verbs, not with adjectives and  
> adverbs." (The motivation of this decree is quite clear to me and  
> has been since
> > Freshman English.)
> >
> > Scott Catledge
> > Professor Emeritus
> >
> > During the "God is dead" fad of the 60's, I had a bumper sticker  
> that
> > said,
> > "My God is alive--sorry about yours."
> >
> > My understanding of the "motivation" is clear to me--sorry it's not
> > clear
> > to him.  Perhaps he should teach a Freshman English course sometime.
> >
> > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
> > interface at:
> >      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> > and select "Join or leave the list"
> >
> > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
> >
> > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web  
> interface at:
> >      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> > and select "Join or leave the list"
> >
> > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
> >
> >
> >
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web  
> interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web  
> interface at:http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and  
> select "Join or leave the list"
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web  
> interface at:http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and  
> select "Join or leave the list"
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web  
> interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and  
> select "Join or leave the list"
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/