There is an ambiguity in Dick’s example depending on who
had the birthday, Egbert or Shakespeare. If it was S’s birthday,
the non-restrictive relative clause is included in the appositive phrase.
If it was E’s birthday, the non-restrictive relative clause is parallel to
and separate from the appositive. A possibly better illustration of an
included clause would be the one in the following, where the clause modifies
the whole phrase, not just S.:
Egbert,
a devotee of Shakespeare, which are quite numerous even today, . . .
From: Assembly for the
Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dick
Veit
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:11 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: question on a relative clause
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Scott Woods <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Could a
non-restrictive noun phrase appositive include a non-restrictive relative
clause element as a postheadword modifier? Scott Woods |
Is this what you mean?
Egbert, a devotee of Shakespeare, whose birthday was
yesterday, ...
Dick Veit
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's
web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select
"Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/