Beth,

Re: "Artists of all kinds have tried their best to express what love means to them."

The phrase "to express what love means to them" is certainly an infinitive phrase, but is it adverbial or nominal?
I opt for nominal in our sentence. I think "their best" is an adverbial, not the direct object, since it answers the question "Tried how?" rather than "Tried what?" On the other hand, "to express what love means to them" can answer the question "Tried what?" so I'd say it is the direct object.

Dick


On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Beth Young <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
"Artists of all kinds have tried  their best to express what love  means to them."

Here's my take:  "to express what love means to them" is an adverbial infinitive phrase.

1. You can move it around:  To express what love means to them, artists of all kinds have tried their best.

2.  It answers the question "why" or "in what manner" the verb happens.  Artists of all kinds have tried their best. Why? "to express what love means to them."

Without that adverbial infinitive phrase, it's easier to see that the main sentence is transitive:  THEY have tried SOMETHING.

"Their best" is a noun phrase/direct object.  I don't have a problem with "best" functioning as a noun--contrast with "their happy" which clearly doesn't work.

To make the whole sentence passive would be clunky, but it is doable:

"To express what love means to them, their best has been tried (by artists of all kinds)."

This passive sentence is bothersome, not so much because of the passive voice, but because we don't know who "them" and "their" refers to until we get to the end.  I could imagine writing this sort of passage:

Their best has been tried.  (And it still wasn't good enough.)

That's how I see it, anyway.  Thanks for the distraction from paper grading.

Beth

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/