Brad,
This is the clearest statement you’ve made of your
understanding of past perfect. There are two problems with it.
First, it requires that both events be in the same sentence, so a two-clause
sentence is required. But a past perfect can be used correctly if the
other event is in the context, even in the non-linguistic context.
Consider something like the following:
A group of us at the conference decided to go to a movie one
evening after sessions were over. Most of the group wanted to see “Slum
Dog Millionaire.” None of them had seen it. I had. I
spent the evening reading the latest Alan Furst novel.
Both past perfects occur in single clause sentences. Both
refer to a time before the decision.
The second problem is that the past perfect can serve either as
the past of the past or as the past of the present perfect. Greenbaum
(Oxford English Grammar, p. 273) illustrates this with the sentence
Uh, had you realized before this meeting that uh the Scott
Cooper’s surveyor hadn’t yet been to the premises?
The first past perfect is a past of a past and the second a past
of a present perfect. (The uhs are in the original because Greenbaum’s
grammar uses almost exclusively example sentences from the International Corpus
of English--Great Britain (ICEGB) and the Wall Street Journal. They
represent English usage from 1989-1993. Greenbaum does not edit the
examples.)
Herb
From: Assembly for the
Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brad
Johnston
Sent: 2009-04-08 09:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Lester's Grammar in the Classroom
Grammar in the
Classroom, by Mark Lester, c.1990. <page 100> Compare the following two sentences. Past: We went to the movies. right Past perfect: We had gone to the movies when you
called. right <page 102> Consider the following sentences. John has brushed
his teeth. right Phil had ordered
breakfast. wrong* <page 103> Verb Phrase: had been working = past perfect
progressive right (no capital letter, no period) <page 104> 9. He
had nearly wrecked the turntable. wrong* Exercise 3.4, #4: The
company had invented a new mousetrap. wrong* <page 236> Exercise 6.4 #2: John had brushed
his teeth. wrong* #4: A student had
reported the accident. wrong* <page 238>
Exercise 6.5 #9. It had touched a
nerve. wrong* I have read that this is the most widely-used
grammar textbook in the land. What I've shown above is a mere sampling but
it's enough to know that the author either doesn't understand the past
perfect or .. or what? Could there be any other explanation? This is Exhibit #102 to my assertion that there is
at least one past perfect error on any grammar website or in any grammar
textbook you can name. Challenges are welcome, encouraged, and appreciated. .brad.08apr09. * The example
sentences marked wrong* are incorrect because they stand
alone, without context. The past perfect is used to denote that an earlier
past event was completed before a later past event. None of the sentences so
marked have the necessary two timing elements. The correct sentence above, We had gone to the movies when you called,
has two elements of timing: (1) when we went to the movies and (2) when
you called, both completed in the past, one before the other. "By the time something happened, something
else had already happened." |
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave
the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/