It's O.K. to copy. Maybe you can agree with Jespersen.
.brad.daytwo.10apr09.
~~~~~~~~
Then I guess we don't communicate. I will send you the chapter from Jespersen I promised and have been delayed in. Beyond that, I see no point in continuing this.
Herb ~~~~~~~~
[log in to unmask] wrote:
You have no "standing" with me and will not have until you define and illustrate the past perfect in this forum. I will not respond to the substance of anything you write on the subject of the past perfect until you demonstrate precisely your understanding of it. If you can do it, do it. This is the end of Day One of your holdout. .brad.09apr09. |
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/