I don't think that everything that gets called "training wheels" in education is bad. On the contrary, "training wheels" are often used as an example of the important educational techniques called "scaffolding." In scaffolding, an instructor offers modeling, guided practice and finally independent practice to help a student master tasks
But if a college student avoids starting sentences with because but still writes sentence fragments--and yes, I have known such students--then I'm thinking that, yes, those training wheels did more harm than good.
I wouldn't want to tell students that using a large amount of sentence starter variation is a hallmark of good writers.
-----Original Message-----From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of Susan van DrutenSent: Thu 5/28/2009 8:09 PMSubject: training wheelsSo weak writers suffer from training wheels?A lovely metaphor which I started and to which I subscribe. So...let'e be clear, what are all the training wheels you abhor? Sentence starts has been deemed damaging. Let's mix metaphors and open up the spigots. What else? What other tactics that are commonly found in writing texts do you find harmful?Have at it.But you do know what the biggest "training wheel" is, don't you?I'll give you a hint it has been condemned since the late 70's. Our district curriculum director won't allow us to purchase books with its name in the title. And (the dead give away) it's in the name of this listserv.Jenkies, how's that for irony?Hurts, donut?On May 28, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Craig Hancock wrote:Brian,I just wanted to say that I find your contributions very thoughtful and helpful. I especially like the way you bring this back to the opening discussion, whether weaker writers needed 'training wheels". I would echo what I see as the core of your position: they do more harm than good.
Craig
O'Sullivan, Brian P wrote:Thanks, Susan. Maybe I need to be more clear, too--I didn't mean that boring essays are a short-term problem; I meant that some solutions to the problem of boring essays are short term (or superficial) solutions. As I meant to imply, I read plenty of boring essays by college students(though I'm sure I read fewer, even as a percentage of my total haul of papers, than high school teachers read--just because my students' high school teachers have done a good job with them). I could come up with silly solutions to this problem--use a world from a funny vocabulary list every few lines, or write in rhyming couplets--which might amuse me (I have a dumb sense of humor) but would probably not make for more effective writing.
Your solution, on the other hand, isn't silly--after all, good writers do include some variant sentence starts, even if it's only 25% of the time, and it's not outlandish to teach students how good writers go about doing this. I actually do not think that sentence starts and coherence are an either/or--you've made it clear that you teach coherence, and I don't see how that could be totally negated by the little time you spend teaching sentence start variation. At the same time, i would not in any way put coherence and sentence start variation on the same level. Coherence is , pretty much by definition, a fundamental aspect of a reader's experience of a text. Sentence start variation is...not. Most of the time, if a revision with more varied sentence starts is better than the draft, that variation is probably an epiphenomenon of some more significant change--like improved coordination or subordination, or improved topic focus in general. If a student thinks that her revision
is better is simply because she started her sentences in more various ways, she may understand what really made the revision better, and thus she may be less likely to transfer her learning to the next context and do even better in the future. And she may not be helped on the path to the (even) longer-term goal of greater syntactical maturity (as you put it) or greater rhetorical awareness and control (as I put it).
I agree with you that our goal (or, one of our goals) is for our students to produce easy to read and pleasurable,informative reading--eventually. But not necessarily while they're in a particular class that we happen to be teaching. Sometimes, as a student experiments with more complex thoughts and expressions, that student's writing may have to get more convoluted before it gets clearer and more pleasureable. I wouldn't want to give the student advice that would privilege a clear and enjoyable product today over a more deliberate and effective writing process tomorrow.
I guess my question for your student would be whether, and why, he or she really wanted to switch the focus of the second sentence of the revision from the Landon's perception to Jamie's condition. Was there a rhetorical purpose, other than simply variation, for switching from "he" to "she" as a subject, only to then switch back again? If so--and there could be such a purpose--great. If not, maybe this revision is one instance where sentence start variation and coherence really did conflict, and I would have favored coherence.
Still, your student is revising and experimenting and certainly not learning a pointless, inflexible rule, like "every sentence must have a different subject." I don't think the different sides in this Great War of Sentence Starters are really all that far apart.
Brian
-----Original Message-----From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of Susan van DrutenSent: Wed 5/27/2009 7:40 PMSubject: Re: Sentences beginning with conjunctions
Thanks, Brian, for some insight. Maybe I need to be more clear abouthow much (how little) I ask students to vary their sentence starts.Usually, it occurs when I walk around the room as they are writing.I'll read over a shoulder and notice lots of similar sentence starts(which are not interesting parallel structure). I'll mention it tothem and they'll read it it back and notice how it sounds to them.They don't want to sound "head-thumpingly boring to read." So theyget it, and they change it on their own, or they'll ask for advice.
"Head-thumpingly boring" essays are short-term problems?
Really??! Really. Really??!
Bad writing is a long-term problem, period. Bad essays are problemsfor a high school teacher who has to read 150. They are problems fora college instructor who doesn't have to read 150. The amount onemust read is irrelevant. There should be no difference of opinionbetween high school or college instructor: if an essay is boring toa high school teacher, it should be boring to a college instructor.The boring might come from uninspired sentence starts or from chaoticcoherence problems. It doesn't matter what the problem is. We canall spot the problem and help our students with whatever is causing it.
This argument has now shifted to a fallacious either-or. It is simplynot true that we must pit sentence start variation againstcoherence. Both are important.
Class size is irrelevant. An exposure to more writing does not makeone unable to distinguish easier reading from head-thumping reading.The goal is that our students produce easy to read and pleasurable,informative reading.
Brian asks about my student's revision, "I'm curious; how mightthe passage's author respond to this kind of advice [show me howeach sentence connects]?"
Brian, that is good advice which often includes considering varyingsentence starts. So I do have an answer of sorts. It's inconclusive(it is very hard to get students to revise). But here is her revision:
Landon is comparing Jamie's weight to leaves falling. She has becomeso sick that she has lost a lot of weight, and he has really startedto notice it. He had to support her as they stood there because shecould barely hold herself up. He is not only realizing just herchange in weight, but it really hits him at this point how much herleukemia has taken over her whole body and in such a short period oftime. He realizes that she doesn't have that much longer.
I have better writers than this. But it's all about taking a writerfrom where she is at and suggesting ideas that her writing shows shehas not been considering.
Susan
On May 27, 2009, at 8:21 AM, O'Sullivan, Brian P wrote:
It seems like one of the differences of opinion here is what ateacher should do with students who "do not have a mature style,"as Susan puts it. Should we give them "training wheels" (aka,"triage" them, give them "bandaids," etc.) to make their writingmore presentable in the short term, or should we try to set them ona path towards developing a more mature style in the long run?These goals don't *necessarily* conflict, but do they "sometimes*conflict? And when do they do conflict, which should take priority?I say that they do sometimes conflict, and that when they do, long-term improvement should take priority.
I believe Susan when she says that her young and struggling writershand in more readable prose when they follow her advice to "changeup your sentence starters." But I also agree with Craig that havingbeen trained this way may make it hard for college writers to thinkin terms of coherence and see the value of repetition. If, as Ithink, both Susan and Craig are right, then the student's shortterm gain (i.e., papers that their high school teachers found alittle easier and head-thumpingly boring to read) may not have beenworth their long-term loss (i.e, greater difficulty in ultimatelyattaining a mature style).
Easy for me to say. As a college teacher, I have smaller classsizes and fewer classes than Susan, and, by and large, I probablyread fewer of those head-thumpingly boring papers. (Was that "good"repetition or "bad," by the way?)But college teachers, too, facetradeoffs between immediate improvement of a paper and long-termimprovement of a writer. For example, I've had plenty of students--often but not always English Language Learners--who can writesimple sentence clearly but get very tangled up when they startcombining clauses. I'm sure none of us would encourage studentslike that to only write in simple sentences. We put up with readingconvoluted sentences so that students can practice, and eventuallyimprove at, coordination and subordination.
"Vary sentences starters," I rush to admit, is not nearly such badadvice as "only use simple sentences" would be! The similarity, inmy mind, is that neither piece of advice acts as a scaffold to helpeventually students reach "mature" levels of rhetorical awarenessand control.
At least I'm probably getting Susan and John to agree; they'reprobably both thinking that I'm being too abstract and talkingabout what should be, not what is! So I'll say how I might respondto the student who wrote the "Landon says Jamie..." paragraph:
"[Student], when I read this, I feel like each thought is separatefrom the next, and there's nothing to show me how they connect,which is more important than the other, which depends on which. Oneof the ways that writers fix that kind of problem for their readersis by combining sentences. Before next class, can you try a fewdifferent ways of combining those seven sentences into three tofive sentences, and tell me which way you like best and why? If youtake another look at that "sentence combining" chapter we read,that will make this easier."
The results would be less predictible then if I just told thestudent to very sentence starters, but at least I'd be asking thestudent to realize that he or she has stylistic choices to make andto think about the effects of those choices on readers. Andconsistently asking students to do that can make a difference overthe long one.
But Susan, I defer to you as an expert on pre-college writers, andI'm curious; how might the passage's author respond to this kind ofadvice?
Brian
Brian O'Sullivan, Ph.D.Assistant Professor of EnglishDirector of the Writing CenterSt. Mary's College of MarylandMontgomery Hall 5018952 E. Fisher Rd.St. Mary's City, Maryland20686240-895-4242
-----Original Message-----From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf ofSusan van DrutenSent: Tue 5/26/2009 8:56 PMSubject: Re: Sentences beginning with conjunctions
John, you have actually made my point.
You say you would "work with this writer to subordinate,coordinate, and complementize/relativize clauses and perhaps toconsider more carefully the semantic weight/information packagingof verb choice."
If I said what you just said to my students, they would look at melike I was trying to be condescending. So, of course, I don't saythat. Instead I just use plain-speak and ask them to change uptheir sentence starts.
Is the student "likely [to] produce confusing sentences(unnecessarily complex structures) out of a belief that that iswhat teachers want"? No. I am there in the high schoolclassroom. They do not create twisted syntax. Instead they fixthe core problem.
I have expertise in this area. I have adjusted my lofty ideas toreflect what works with my struggling student writers. You cankeep trying to justify what you think should work, but it conflictswith what I have experienced.
On May 26, 2009, at 6:48 PM, John Dews-Alexander wrote:
I would not encourage this student to vary sentence openers asthere is no problem with the sentence openers. The writer clearlyhas a focused topic in mind that will carry forward as giveninformation throughout the paragraph (if that is not an appropriatetopic for that length of time, then that is the problem, not thestructure).
I would work with this writer to subordinate, coordinate, andcomplementize/relativize clauses and perhaps to consider morecarefully the semantic weight/information packaging of verb choice.
Focusing on sentence opener variation here would seem (to me)quite a distraction from the real problems that indicate thematurity of the writing. The writer would not improve the coreproblems and would likely produce confusing sentences(unnecessarily complex structures) out of a belief that that iswhat teachers want.
John AlexanderAustin, Texas
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Susan van Druten
Craig, you are ignoring my concern when you continue to bring upFrost, Obama, and Silko. We agree that purposeful repetition isthe mark of a mature style. You should now drop that out of yourargument. In fact you should have dropped that on after May 18thwhen I acknowledged and refuted your point. I said, "When I coverparallel structure in AP and honors classes, we talk about thedifference between purposeful repetition (emphasis, humor, known-new, hooks, etc.) and repetition born by uninspired, lazy writing."
I am teaching students who do not have a mature style. I went toschool today to find you an example. Do you or do you not agreethat the writer below could use some advice on changing up hersentence starts?
Landon says Jamie is "lighter than the leaves of a tree that hadfallen in autumn." He is comparing Jamie's weight to leavesfalling. He has really started to notice it that she has become sosick that she has lost a lot of weight. He had to support herbecause she could barely hold herself up. He is not only realizingjust her change in weight. He sees how much her leukemia has takenover her whole body and in such a short period of time. Herealizes that she doesn't have that much longer.
On May 26, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Craig Hancock wrote:
Susan,I believe our teaching practices should be based on a solidunderstanding of how language works. If we tell students thatvaryingsentence openings (using something other than the subject asopening)isa goal of good writing, then we should find a high number of thosevariations in excellent writing. The truth is that we don't.As an explanation for your motivation, you mentioned thatstudentssometimes keep the same subject for as much as five sentences in arow. Again, I tried to point out that good writers do this quiteoften. I mentioned Frost's "Acquainted with the Night", whichstartsevery sentence with "I have", copied in the opening to LeslieSilko'smuch anthologized "Yellow Woman" to show that the great majority ofthe sentences started with "I", many of them consecutively, andcopieda passage from Obama's heralded speech on race to show how heeffectively repeats the same subject or same subject opening forlongstretches of text. I don't mean to imply that you are dealing withmature writers, but starting sentences with the subject andrepeatingsentence openers can be thought of as the mark of a mature style.There are good reasons for this. If you look at informationflow in atext (given/new), given is almost always first and new is almostalwayslast. The most important function of a sentence opener (usually thesubject for good writers) is not variation, but continuity. Theopeningestablishes connection with what went before. One obvious way toaccomplish that is to repeat openings. Good writers exploitrepetitionfor these purposes. Inexperienced writers tend to move on much tooquickly.The one place we agree, I think, is that a number of differentstructures can act as the subject of a sentence and students shouldhave those available as resources. I believe they should be usedforcontinuity, though, not for variation.I think we have gotten confused from time to time about whatkind ofvariation we are talking about. A variation of subject is one. Avariation of the kinds of structures that can act as subject isanother. A variation of the kinds of structures that opensentences isanother.Christensen's essay seems to me good argument for expectingthat mostsentences will start with the subject and that when we havevariationform that (about 25% of the time), those will usually be simpleadverbials.As a more direct answer to your question, I believe it isharmful toimply to students that good writers try to vary their sentenceopenings. I spend more time with my students trying to get themto seehow good writers use repetition, including a repetition ofsubjects, tobuild coherence into texts.I'm glad you can understand this as a discussion about goodteachingpractices, not a personal criticism.
Craig
Craig, I'm still not clear on where you stand. Do you stillbelieve
it is bad practice for a teacher to show students various ways tostart sentences? Is it harmful to have them try changing upsentences on a worksheet? (I don't know how you got the ideathat Iwas requiring them to vary every start in their own essays.)
I enjoy the spirit of the conversation. Just because I thoughtyouwere dismissing my argument and called you on it doesn't mean I amnot enjoying myself.
Susan
On May 24, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Craig Hancock wrote:
Susan,I believe that mentoring young people on their path towarda matureliteracy is a very difficult process. As teachers, we shouldall beconstantly examining and refining our practices. We are far,far fromperfect in what we do. That is at least equally true of ourprofessionas a whole. We need to ask ourselves, over and over again, ifwhat weare doing is best for the students we are serving. Once youposted tothe list that you ask students to vary their sentence openingsto keepfrom being boring, that advice became subject to the kind ofconversation we do routinely on this list. It has nothing atall to dowith whether any of us believe you are a nazi or a badteacher. Wesimply need to be able to consider these approaches with anopen mind.I hope you can understand that the spirit of conversation wasneverintended to be personal.That being said, I would ask you to question seriouslywhether the"style guide" you are using is at all thoughtful or accurate.It says,first of all, that students use non-subject openers about 50%of thetime. I wonder if that is based on any kind of scholarlystudy. Thestudies refered to on list recently seem to show that aprofessionalwriter opens with the subject much MORE than that, at anaverage ofabout 75%. The lowest total in Christensen's study was 60%, thehighestabout 90% for acclaimed professional writers. If that is thecase,thenstudents already vary sentence openings more than maturewriters. Iwould add that the writers in the study were successful, notboring.I would recommend a book like Martha Kolln's "RhetoricalGrammar" as amore linguistically sound source of advice.But above all, don't be shy about joining our talk. Iapologize ifanything I said made you feel as if you were under attack as ateacher.As a profession, we are still a long way from having fullygrounded,effective, widely accepted practices. We need to be respectfulof eachother as we work that out, and I apologize again for any failureson mypart to do that.
Craig
Jean, I give them a handout that can be found in many styleguides.
I'm pasting it in. Sorry if some of you thought I was a writingNazi, who demanded students never dare repeat the samestarting wordin an entire essay. Yikes, I should have experienced lots moreoutrage, tar, and feathers!
Sentence BeginningsVary the beginnings of your sentences.
Most writers begin about half their sentences with the subject-farmore than the number of sentences begun in any other way. Butoveruse of the subject-first beginnings results in monotonouswriting. Below are several ways to vary the beginnings of yoursentences.
WORDS
Two adjectives: Angry and proud, Alice resolved tofight back.
An adverb: Suddenly a hissing andclattering camefrom the heights around us.
A connecting word: For students who have justsurvived thebrutal college-entrance marathon, this competitive atmosphereis alltoo familiar. But others, accustomed to being stars in highschool,find themselves feeling lost in a crowd of overachievers.
An interrupting adverb: A healthy body, however, is just asimportant as a healthy mind.
A series of words: Light, water, temperature,minerals-these affect the health of plants.
PHRASES
A connecting phrase: If the Soviet care and feeding ofathletes at times looks enviable, it is far from perfect. Foronething, it can be ruthless.
A prepositional phrase: Out of necessity they stitched all oftheir secret fears and lingering childhood nightmares into thisexistence.
An infinitive: To be really successful, you willhave to be trilingual: fluent in English, Spanish, and computer.
A gerund: Maintaining a daily exerciseprogramis essential.
A participle: Looking out of the window highoverthe state of Kansas, we see a pattern of a single farmhousesurrounded by fields, followed by another single homesteadsurroundedby fields.
An appositive: A place of refuge, the Missionprovidesfood and shelter for Springfield's homeless.
An absolute: His fur bristling, the cat wenton theattack.
CLAUSES
An adverbial clause: When you first start writing-andI thinkit's true for a lot of beginning writers-you're scared todeath thatif you don't get that sentence right that minute it's nevergoing toshow up again.
An adjective clause: The freshman, who was not ajoiner oforganizations, found herself unanimously elected president ofa groupof animal lovers.
A noun clause: Why earthquakes occur is aquestions toask a geologist.
On May 22, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Jean Waldman wrote:
Susan,This is the first time you mentioned that you teach the studentsHOW to vary their sentences. I was under the impression that youjust demand that they do it and grade them on whether they do it.
What method do you use to teach the different possiblevariations?
Jean Waldman----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan van Druten"
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:and select "Join or leave the list"
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:and select "Join or leave the list"
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:and select "Join or leave the list"Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/