Another observation: participles loving, winning, and losing have superlatives but not comparatives: The Canandian women's ice hockey team was the winningest in the Olympics, even winninger than the Americans.
Dick
Just some more observations.There is a certain phonetic similarity about the two-syllable words that attract the -est suffix: they seem to end in an unstressed vowel or sonnant, e.g., able, clever, common, feeble, gentle, narrow, shallow, simple. Some single-syllables that end in -ng make the g hard, e.g., long (longest), strong (strongest). The fact that the adjective forming -ing does not seem to do this suggests a separate allophone or morphophonemic rule. Also the -y adjectives that attract -est can often have another syllable added to the front, as, unhappiest, untidiest. This does not seem to be the same for loving or winning: *"the unlovingest disciple", ?"the unwinningest team this season."Bruce
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/