Susan, So, now you are an expert psychologist who has the powers to divine how Brad is going to answer to Jack? My, my! Besides, your manners are very bad. If I had to try to divine, too, what kind of character is hiding behind your messages (Which I am not going to do!), I would say that your profile is that of a single and bitter woman over fifty, desperate for attention and willing to do anything to get it. So sad! But, of course, I have no divining powers, so I will not attempt to profile you. You may have just had a bad day and were in a bad mood when you wrote the message to Jack. No offense intended. Eduard ----- Original Message ----- From: Susan van Druten <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 15:28 Subject: Re: T-J-Ray and the past-perfect To: [log in to unmask] > Hi Jack, > > The next email from Brad (or any other subsequent email from > him) will not answer your two questions. His asking you > about your ability to read encoded text is so that he can avoid > responding to your questions by inundating you with irrelevant > examples. > > Watch and see. It's practically a science. > > Happy new year, > Susan > > > > On Dec 28, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Dixon, Jack wrote: > > > Yes, it is all coming through. > > > > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar > [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brad Johnston > [[log in to unmask]]> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:22 AM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: T-J-Ray and the past-perfect > > > > Thanks, Jack. Nice of you to drop by. Are you set for, or can > you be set for, html, "color and graphics" by whatever name? .. > so that this is bold and this is bold and red and this is > underlined and this is in italics? > > > > .brad.28dec10. > > > > From: "Dixon, Jack" <[log in to unmask]> > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Sent: Mon, December 27, 2010 1:03:58 PM > > Subject: Re: T-J-Ray and the past-perfect > > > > Brad: > > > > You may respond to me off the listserv if you want to keep the > suspense going -- or on the listserv. I would define the > past perfect as the aspect of the past we use to express the > first of two actions that occurred at different points in the > past. That is, past perfect is used to express the action > in the remote past, while the simple past is used to express the > action that happened closest to the present. Clearly, I am > wrong.> > > All I ask is two things: 1) what is the past > perfect? 2) what is the source of your definition/usage if > all the other sources are wrong? > > > > If you have answered these two questions in the past, I beg > your indulgence. If you answer these, I'll file away your > response so that I will not have to trouble you again. > > > > Jack > > [log in to unmask] > > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar > [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brad Johnston > [[log in to unmask]]> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 10:35 AM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: T-J-Ray and the past-perfect > > > > Here's what happens, T.J. I say to someone -- often an > English teacher -- "what is the past perfect?" And they think, > (he or she thinks), Hey, I know what the past perfect is. But > then at the behest of the Little Voice, they think, I better > look it up, just to be sure. > > > > The first definition they find is that it "denotes an action > or state completed at of before a past time spoken of" > <Webster's 11th Edition>. They think, hmmm. The battle of > Hastings had been fought before the Magna Carta was signed? That > doesn't work, so maybe I should look elsewhere. (Webster's has > agreed, by the way, to reconsider their entry for the present > perfect before the 12th Edition goes to press, as well they > should; they made a mess of it.) > > > > Next they find this one: "It is used to refer to a situation > in the past that came before another situation in the past. > (Hmmm, same problem.) The past perfect represents either the > past of the simple past (well, hardly) or the past of the the > present perfect", which we all know isn't true. <English > Grammar, Sidney Greenbaum, 1986> > > > > Maybe since we got our language from the Latins, we should > look there. Let's see. "The pluperfect tense indicates an action > that takes place more in the past or prior to another past > action." Hey, are these people copying from each other? > <Latin for Dummies, Hull, Perkins, et al.> > > > > Quirk, Greenbaum, et al, don't try to define it, but they > give, among other illustrations, "The goalkeeper had injured his > leg and couldn't play", and "He had died in 1920, before his son > was born". > > > > "The past perfect tense describes an action completed sometime > in the past", <Columbia Guide to Standard American English, 1993> > > > > "The past perfect tense indicates that one past event preceded > another", <Handbook of Technical Writing, Alred, Brusaw & > Oliu, 2003> > > > > "The pluperfect is a compound tense conjugated with avoir and > etre and is used to say what had happened", <Teach Yourself > French Grammar, Sidwell & Haviland> (Isn't this a dandy?) > > > > "The past perfect is a perfective tense used to express action > completed in the past", <The Free Dictionary> > > > > "The past perfect - An event or state started at one point in > the past and ended at another point in the past", <Gareth > Jones Website> > > > > "The past perfect is often used to emphasis (sic) that one > action, event or condition ended before another past action, > event, or condition ended." <University of Ottawa> > > > > "The past perfect tense represents an action as completed at a > past time. It may denote that an action occurred at an > indefinite or definite time in the past." <Descriptive > English Grammar, Susan Emolyn Harman> > > > > I better quit before I bore you right out of your chair, T.J. > The point is that if you try to look it up, you will find a > hodgepodge of meaningless and inconsistent definitions and > explanations. You will think, whateverthehell are these people > talking about? Someone should sit down and try to figure out > what it is and if it isn't anything, let's stop teaching it, or > trying to teach it, since no one seems to know what it is. > > > > Of all the many people of whom I asked "what is it?", only two > have been willing to answer. One said that "the past perfect is > had + the past participle", which is rather like saying a ladder > is something with a rung or a train is something with wheels (as > are lawnmowers and rickshaws). The other more recent try, which > you may have seen, we should leave lying with the sleeping dog, > to not foment an unnecessary exchange of gunfire. > > > > ALL the others, and that includes the most eloquent and > talkative on this listserv, cannot do it. I feel certain they > would if they could but they can't. They don't know it > themselves and when they try to look it up, they get what you > see a sample of above. The "definitions" are all over the map > and there are hundreds more like them. > > > > Let me ask you, T-J, what is the past perfect? > > > > If you either (a) rant and snort and call me names, or (b) not > reply, you will, as any reasonable person would agree, prove my point. > > > > Good hunting. Let me know what you think. I'm very much > interested. I've been at this for a long time but a reasonable, > coherent conclusion everyone -- including but not limited to > novelists, journalists, and grammarians -- can accept still > seems far away. Maybe you can help us. > > > > .brad.27dec10. > > > > > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's > web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's > web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web > interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/