Although dependent clauses that follow the s-v often do get a comma - is there some sort of restrictive and unrestrictive d.c. rule?

Geoff Layton


 


Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:58:51 -0500
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Punctuation Question
To: [log in to unmask]


The comma is not necessary because what follows is a dependent clause.

Kari Anderson


-----Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> wrote: -----


To: [log in to unmask]
From: "T. J. Ray" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 04/12/2011 06:10PM
Subject: Punctuation Question

I have a doctoral student who produces sentences like the following:

"This quatrain cannot be read in isolation at all, because the syntax 
is
inherent and incomplete on its own."

My question is not a search for whatever he meant to say but is about
his punctuation:  the comma.  Comments are welcome.

T. J.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" 
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ 		 	   		  
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/