Scott,
I don't think I'd call it stupid or asinine. It may not be brilliantly clever, but it does make sense and contains wordplay, of at least the typographical variety, with the "6" functioning as both the number and the letter "S." It's a blend/portmanteau like "spork" and "brunch": "$6 Savory..." becomes "$6avory...." From the commercial point of view, it clearly got your attention, and that was undoubtedly the merchant's intention. I'd give it a B or B- rather than an F.
Dick
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"I keep seeing a billboard that says the following:
$6avory sandwiches (‘sandwiches’ is a substitute for the real word to avoid lawsuits).
$6 would be pronounced /siks dollahrz/ but its placement in an adjectival position (nouns can be used as adjectives but not normally as adverbs modifying a word in the adjectival position before a noun) Indicates that /siks dollahr/ would be the expected pronunciation. [a six-dollar hamburger—not a six-dollars hamburger] The ad writer apparently wanted the final consonant of the word before avory to carry over; unfortunately, /siks dollah ravory/ makes no sense and /siks dollah zavory/ is equally asinine. It seems as of the person trying to be cute and eye-catching succeeded in catching attention—but a WTH reaction does not inspire me to eat there.
The only comments that I have heard on the billboard are along the line of “Is that stupid or what?” None of the commenter were grammarians or linguists but they felt intuitively that the sign made no sense. They all seemed dismissive or irritated at the sign—none seemed amused.
Would anyone like to comment or add another nomination for worse ad of the year?
Scott
Norman Scott Catledge, PhD/STD
Professor Emeritus
history & languages
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/