Who can argue against "accountability"? I wonder what the response of the teachers' unions will be?

Geoff Layton
 
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:16:21 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Quick Common CoTo join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ========================================================================Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:09:06 -0700 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: Bruce Despain <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PERJViBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6VmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsgZm9udC1zaXplOjEw cHQ7Ij48RElWPlRoZSA8U1RST05HPjxFTT5PUjwvRU0+PC9TVFJPTkc+IGlzIGxvZ2ljYWxseSBp bmNsdXNpdmUgYW5kIHRoZSBtb3JlIGNsZWFyIGNvbm5lY3RpdmUgd291bGQgYmUgPFNUUk9ORz48 RU0+QU5EPC9FTT48L1NUUk9ORz4uJm5ic3A7IDwvRElWPg0KPERJVj5JdCBpcyBpbnRlcmVzdGlu ZyBpbiB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBwb2xpdGljYWwgZGViYXRlIGhvdyB0aGUgRGVtb2NyYXRzIGFyZSBx dWljayB0byBpbnRlcnByZXQgdGhlIDxFTT48U1RST05HPk9SPC9TVFJPTkc+PC9FTT4gaW4gdGhl IHN0YXRlbWVudCBhYm91dCBSb21uZXkncyBmZWxvbnkgPEVNPk9SPC9FTT4gZGVjZWl0IGFzIGxv Z2ljYWxseSBleGNsdXNpdmUsIHdoZXJlYXMgdGhlIFJlcHVibGljYW5zIGFyZSBhcHQgdG8gc2F5 IHRoZSBzdGF0ZW1lbnQgaXMgZmFsc2UgYmVjYXVzZSB0aGUgPEVNPjxTVFJPTkc+T1I8L1NUUk9O Rz48L0VNPiBpcyBpbmNsdXNpdmUgYW5kIHRoZSBmZWxvbnkgaXMgb2J2aW91c2x5IGZhbHNlLiZu YnNwOyBUaGlzIHdvcmQgc2VlbXMgdG8gYmUgdXNlZCBsb29zZWx5IHJvdXRpbmVseS4gUHVuZGl0 cyBzYXkgaXQgaXMgYSAicGFyc2luZyIgZGlmZmljdWx0eSwgYnV0IHRoZSBzZW1hbnRpYyA8U1RS T05HPmludGVycHJldGF0aW9uPC9TVFJPTkc+IGlzIGEgbGV2ZWwgZnVydGhlciBiZWxvdyB0aGUg c3ludGFjdGljIHBhcnNlLiZuYnNwOyBbQlRXLCB0aGUgc2lnbmF0dXJlIG9uIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVu dHMgaW4gcXVlc3Rpb24gd2FzIGEgbGVnYWwgZmljdGlvbiAtLSBub3QgZmVsb25vdXNdPEJSPjxC Uj4tLS0gd3JpdGVAQ0VOVFVSWVRFTC5ORVQgd3JvdGU6PEJSPjxCUj5Gcm9tOiBKYW4gS2FtbWVy dCAmbHQ7d3JpdGVAQ0VOVFVSWVRFTC5ORVQmZ3Q7PEJSPlRvOiBBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJ Ty5FRFU8QlI+U3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFF1aWNrIENvbW1vbiBDb3JlIHF1ZXN0aW9uPEJSPkRhdGU6 Jm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7IFR1ZSwgMjEgQXVnIDIwMTIgMTE6NTk6NDQgLTA0 MDA8QlI+PEJSPklzIGFueW9uZSBlbHNlIGJvdGhlcmVkIGJ5IHRoZSB1c2Ugb2YgdGhlIHdvcmQg Im9yIiBpbiAjMSBiZWxvdz8mbmJzcDsgQXM8QlI+aW4uLi4gd3JpdGluZyBPUiBzcGVha2luZz8m bmJzcDsgRG9lcyB0aGlzIG1lYW4gd3JpdGluZyBBTkQgc3BlYWtpbmc/PEJSPjxCUj5Eb2VzIGFu eW9uZSBrbm93IHdobyB3YXMgaW4gdGhlIGdyb3VwIHRoYXQgd29ya2VkIG91dCB0aGUgQ0M/PEJS PjxCUj5JIGFtIGEgbWlkZGxlIHNjaG9vbCB0ZWFjaGVyLCBhbmQgSSBmZWVsIG92ZXJ3aGVsbWVk IHdpdGggYm90aCBob3cgbWFueTxCUj5zdGFuZGFyZHMgdGhlcmUgYXJlLCBhbmQgaG93IG11Y2gg bW9yZSBjaGFsbGVuZ2luZyB0aGV5IGFyZSB0aGFuIHRoZTxCUj5zdGFuZGFyZHMgd2UgaGF2ZSBi ZWVuIHVzaW5nLjxCUj48QlI+SSBhbHNvIGZpbmQgbW9zdCBvZiB0aGUgc3RhbmRhcmRzIHZhZ3Vl IGVub3VnaCB0aGF0IEknbSBub3QgYWx3YXlzIHN1cmU8QlI+d2hhdCB0aGV5IG1lYW4uJm5ic3A7 IEknbSBub3Qgb25seSB0YWxraW5nIGFib3V0IHRoZSBsYW5ndWFnZSAoZ3JhbW1hcik8QlI+c3Rh bmRhcmRzLiZuYnNwOyBFbmdsaXNoIHRlYWNoZXJzIGhhdmUgcmVhZGluZyBhbmQgd3JpdGluZyBz dGFuZGFyZHMgdG9vLjxCUj5KYW48QlI+PEJSPjxCUj5RdW90aW5nIEpvaG4gQ2hvcmF6eSAmbHQ7 am9obi5jaG9yYXp5QFBFUVVBTk5PQ0suT1JHJmd0Ozo8QlI+QSBmZXcgTGFuZ3VhZ2UgU3RhbmRh cmRzIGZvciAxMS0xMiBncmFkZXMgKHdpdGggbXkgcGFyZW50aGV0aWNhbDxCUj5hbm5vdGF0aW9u cyk6Jm5ic3A7PEJSPjxCUj4xLiBEZW1vbnN0cmF0ZSBjb21tYW5kIG9mIHRoZSBjb252ZW50aW9u cyBvZiBzdGFuZGFyZCBFbmdsaXNoIGdyYW1tYXI8QlI+YW5kIHVzYWdlIHdoZW4gd3JpdGluZyBv ciBzcGVha2luZyAoSSdkIGFncmVlIHRoZXJlIGlzIG5vIHNwZWNpZmljPEJSPmRlbWFuZCBoZXJl IGZvciBhIGxhbmd1YWdlIHNldCB0aGF0IGRlc2NyaWJlcyB0aGUgY29udmVudGlvbnMsIGJ1dDxC Uj50aGVyZSBpcyBicm9hZCByb29tIGZvciBpbnRyb2R1Y2luZyBpdCBhbmQgZm9yIHN0dWRlbnRz IHRvIGVtcGxveSBpdCBpbjxCUj5vcmRlciB0byBmdWxmaWxsIHRoZSByZXF1aXJlbWVudHMgb2Yg YW4gRUxBIGNvdXJzZS4gVGhlIFN0YW5kYXJkczxCUj5hcmVuJ3QgdGhlIGVuZCBvciB0aGUgYWxs IG9mIHRoZSBjdXJyaWN1bHVtLCB0aGV5J3JlIGEgZnJhbWV3b3JrIGZvcjxCUj4iY29sbGVnZSBy ZWFkaW5lc3MiLi4uIHRob3VnaCBtYXliZSB0aGF0J3MgYW5vdGhlciBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGluPEJS Pml0c2VsZi4uLikuICZuYnNwO2EuIEFwcGx5IHRoZSB1bmRlcnN0YW5kaW5nIHRoYXQgdXNhZ2Ug aXMgYSBtYXR0ZXIgb2Y8QlI+Y29udmVudGlvbiwgY2FuIGNoYW5nZSBvdmVyIHRpbWUsIGFuZCBp cyBzb21ldGltZXMgY29udGVzdGVkIChIb3cgZG9lczxCUj5vbmUgYXBwbHkgdGhpcyB1bmRlcnN0 YW5kaW5nIHdpdGhvdXQgYSBjb21tb24gbGFuZ3VhZ2Ugc2V0IHRvIGVuZ2FnZSBpbjxCUj5hIHBy b2R1Y3RpdmUgY29udmVyc2F0aW9uPyBJIHRoaW5rIHRoZXJlJ3MgcGxlbnR5IG9mIHJvb20gZm9y IHRoZTxCUj5jbGFzc3Jvb20gdGVhY2hlciBoZXJlLCBuZWNlc3NhcmlseSkuICZuYnNwO2IuIFJl c29sdmUgaXNzdWVzIG9mIGNvbXBsZXggb3I8QlI+Y29udGVzdGVkIHVzYWdlLCBjb25zdWx0aW5n IHJlZmVyZW5jZXMgKGUuZy5NZXJyaWFtLSBXZWJzdGVy4oCZczxCUj5EaWN0aW9uYXJ5IG9mIEVu Z2xpc2ggVXNhZ2UsIEdhcm5lcuKAmXMgTW9kZXJuIEFtZXJpY2FuIFVzYWdlKSBhczxCUj5uZWVk ZWQgKFNhbWUgYXMgYWJvdmUsIEknZCBzYXkuIENvbXBsZXggaXNzdWVzIGRlbWFuZCBhIGNvbXBs ZXggamFyZ29uKS48QlI+PEJSPlRvIGpvaW4gb3IgbGVhdmUgdGhpcyBMSVNUU0VSViBsaXN0LCBw bGVhc2UgdmlzaXQgdGhlIGxpc3QncyB3ZWIgaW50ZXJmYWNlIGF0OjxCUj4mbmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7 IGh0dHA6Ly9saXN0c2Vydi5tdW9oaW8uZWR1L2FyY2hpdmVzL2F0ZWcuaHRtbDxCUj5hbmQgc2Vs ZWN0ICJKb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoZSBsaXN0IjxCUj48QlI+VmlzaXQgQVRFRydzIHdlYiBzaXRl IGF0IGh0dHA6Ly9hdGVnLm9yZy88QlI+PEJSPjxCUj48L0RJVj48L0RJVj4========================================================================Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:11:06 -0400 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: Scott Carledge <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: ATEG Digest - 18 Aug 2012 to 20 Aug 2012 (#2012-74) In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Determine if this or that" gives you a choice. "Determine whether" would be more appropriate if one has students who are neither second-language learners nor linguistically impaired. Scott Catledge -----Original Message----- From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of ATEG automatic digest system Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:02 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: ATEG Digest - 18 Aug 2012 to 20 Aug 2012 (#2012-74) There are 8 messages totalling 1774 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Quick Common Core question (8) To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:26:34 +0000 From: Ed Vavra <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question Bill, Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses. Ed V. -----Original Message----- From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Quick Common Core question Hi all -- I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge." Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around. Sincerely, Bill Spruiell To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:29:58 -0500 From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question --_b7dc697e-298a-419a-a6f2-7d6da7e2b70b_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can we get an article for the ATEG Journal out of this discussion? Geoff Layton > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:26:34 +0000 > From: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > To: [log in to unmask] > > Bill, > Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses. > Ed V. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Quick Common Core question > > Hi all -- > > I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge." > > Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around. > > Sincerely, > > Bill Spruiell > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_b7dc697e-298a-419a-a6f2-7d6da7e2b70b_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can we get an article for the ATEG Journal out of this discussion?

Geoff Layton
 
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:26:34 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Bill,
> Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses.
> Ed V.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Quick Common Core question
>
> Hi all --
>
> I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge."
>
> Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Bill Spruiell
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_b7dc697e-298a-419a-a6f2-7d6da7e2b70b_-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:43:34 +0000 From: "Spruiell, William C" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question Herb, Ed, and Geoffrey: Thanks for the input — I was suspecting that many of the grammar-related standards were in roughly the same position as that of Schroedinger's cat, and this seems to be the case. I'd think that a journal piece would be useful, especially if it has any chance at all of spurring anyone in the CC initiative to make a statement one way or another. Of course, the indeterminacy itself may be some of the sugar helping the medicine go down. Sincerely, Bill S. From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Date: Monday, August 20, 2012 12:29 PM To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question Can we get an article for the ATEG Journal out of this discussion? Geoff Layton > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:26:34 +0000 > From: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > To: [log in to unmask] > > Bill, > Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses. > Ed V. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Quick Common Core question > > Hi all -- > > I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge." > > Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around. > > Sincerely, > > Bill Spruiell > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:45:18 -0400 From: John Chorazy <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question --14dae93993cfe38dce04c7b7bfaf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A few Language Standards for 11-12 grades (with my parenthetical annotations): 1. *Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking* (I'd agree there is no specific demand here for a language set that describes the conventions, but there is broad room for introducing it and for students to employ it in order to fulfill the requirements of an ELA course. The Standards aren't the end or the all of the curriculum, they're a framework for "college readiness"... though maybe that's another discussion in itself...). a. *Apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested* (How does one apply this understanding without a common language set to engage in a productive conversation? I think there's plenty of room for the classroom teacher here, necessarily). b.* Resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g.Merriam- Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, Garner’s Modern American Usage) as needed* (Same as above, I'd say. Complex issues demand a complex jargon). 3. *Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when reading or listening* (This is clearly metaknowledge, though I still agree with Ed that nothing is demanded in specific terms.). a. *Vary syntax for effect, consulting references (e.g., Tufte’s Artful Sentences) for guidance as needed; apply an understanding of syntax to the study of complex texts when reading* (When students are asked to apply or demonstrate knowledge, it's going to be up to the classroom teacher to determine how that's satisfied. But the suggestion of a guiding text (Tufte or any other) is a nod toward the need for complex and expert information to resolve complex issues). To go back a bit, the Standards state that 5th graders should be able to use correlative conjunctions, explain the functions of conjunctions and prepositions, and form and use various verb tenses; by grade 8, students should be able to *Explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences* and *Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening*. None of that is done without metacognition and application of at least a few terms regarding grammar - though I'm aware that the slant is pitched away from using such terms because their practicality is questioned. I think it will be interesting to see what's on the state tests, frankly; the Consortia who are determining the high stakes assessments for the Standards are the ones who'll have the final interpretation. My sense is that there won't be any questions "about" grammar in sight... but embedded within the questions and readings will be a need for a rich understanding of the complexities of language, especially by 11-12th grades. Sincerely, John On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ed Vavra <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Bill, > Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses. > Ed V. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto: [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Quick Common Core question > > Hi all -- > > I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge." > > Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around. > > Sincerely, > > Bill Spruiell > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ -- John Chorazy English II and III, Academic and Honors Advisor, Panther Press Pequannock Township High School 973.616.6000 To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --14dae93993cfe38dce04c7b7bfaf Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

A few Language Standards for 11-12 grades (with my parenthetical annotations):
 
1. Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking (I'd agree there is no specific demand here for a language set that describes the conventions, but there is broad room for introducing it and for students to employ it in order to fulfill the requirements of an ELA course. The Standards aren't the end or the all of the curriculum, they're a framework for "college readiness"... though maybe that's another discussion in itself...).
 
a. Apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested (How does one apply this understanding without a common language set to engage in a productive conversation? I think there's plenty of room for the classroom teacher here, necessarily).
 
b. Resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g.Merriam- Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, Garner’s Modern American Usage) as needed (Same as above, I'd say. Complex issues demand a complex jargon).
 
3. Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when reading or listening (This is clearly metaknowledge, though I still agree with Ed that nothing is demanded in specific terms.).
 
a. Vary syntax for effect, consulting references (e.g., Tufte’s Artful Sentences) for guidance as needed; apply an understanding of syntax to the study of complex texts when reading (When students are asked to apply or demonstrate knowledge, it's going to be up to the classroom teacher to determine how that's satisfied. But the suggestion of a guiding text (Tufte or any other) is a nod toward the need for complex and expert information to resolve complex issues).
 
To go back a bit, the Standards state that 5th graders should be able to use correlative conjunctions, explain the functions of conjunctions and prepositions, and form and use various verb tenses; by grade 8, students should be able to Explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences and Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening. None of that is done without metacognition and application of at least a few terms regarding grammar - though I'm aware that the slant is pitched away from using such terms because their practicality is questioned.
 
I think it will be interesting to see what's on the state tests, frankly; the Consortia who are determining the high stakes assessments for the Standards are the ones who'll have the final interpretation. My sense is that there won't be any questions "about" grammar in sight... but embedded within the questions and readings will be a need for a rich understanding of the complexities of language, especially by 11-12th grades.
 
Sincerely,
 
John
 
 
 
 
 
 
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ed Vavra <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Bill,
> Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses.
> Ed V.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Quick Common Core question
>
> Hi all --
>
> I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge."
>
> Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Bill Spruiell
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
>      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
>      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
 
 
 
 
--
John Chorazy
English II and III, Academic and Honors
Advisor, Panther Press
Pequannock Township High School
973.616.6000
 
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --14dae93993cfe38dce04c7b7bfaf-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:49:21 -0500 From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question --_a12bdece-5e98-4816-aa49-a426b42e217d_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Herb, Ed, Bill and all you other ATEGers - So who's going to step up to the plate to take a swing at that elusive curve ball - an essay for an academic journal (about 3,500 words)? Geoff Layton > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:43:34 +0000 > From: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > To: [log in to unmask] > > Herb, Ed, and Geoffrey: > > Thanks for the input — I was suspecting that many of the grammar-related standards were in roughly the same position as that of Schroedinger's cat, and this seems to be the case. I'd think that a journal piece would be useful, especially if it has any chance at all of spurring anyone in the CC initiative to make a statement one way or another. Of course, the indeterminacy itself may be some of the sugar helping the medicine go down. > > Sincerely, > > Bill S. > > From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]> > Reply-To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Monday, August 20, 2012 12:29 PM > To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > > Can we get an article for the ATEG Journal out of this discussion? > > Geoff Layton > > > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:26:34 +0000 > > From: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > > To: [log in to unmask] > > > > Bill, > > Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses. > > Ed V. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C > > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Quick Common Core question > > > > Hi all -- > > > > I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge." > > > > Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Bill Spruiell > > > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > > and select "Join or leave the list" > > > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > > and select "Join or leave the list" > > > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_a12bdece-5e98-4816-aa49-a426b42e217d_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Herb, Ed, Bill and all you other ATEGers -
 
So who's going to step up to the plate to take a swing at that elusive curve ball - an essay for an academic journal (about 3,500 words)?

Geoff Layton
 
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:43:34 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Herb, Ed, and Geoffrey:
>
> Thanks for the input — I was suspecting that many of the grammar-related standards were in roughly the same position as that of Schroedinger's cat, and this seems to be the case. I'd think that a journal piece would be useful, especially if it has any chance at all of spurring anyone in the CC initiative to make a statement one way or another. Of course, the indeterminacy itself may be some of the sugar helping the medicine go down.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Bill S.
>
> From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Reply-To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Date: Monday, August 20, 2012 12:29 PM
> To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question
>
> Can we get an article for the ATEG Journal out of this discussion?
>
> Geoff Layton
>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:26:34 +0000
> > From: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question
> > To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > Bill,
> > Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses.
> > Ed V.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C
> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Quick Common Core question
> >
> > Hi all --
> >
> > I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge."
> >
> > Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Bill Spruiell
> >
> > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> > and select "Join or leave the list"
> >
> > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
> >
> > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> > and select "Join or leave the list"
> >
> > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_a12bdece-5e98-4816-aa49-a426b42e217d_-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:11:15 -0400 From: "MARLOW, DAVID" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question --_000_994B1DDEC62548B490B02B9CFE9D2AF6uscupstateedu_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBtaWdodCBiZSB3aWxsaW5nLi4uIFdoZW4gZG8geW91IG5lZWQgaXQ/DQoNCjwgSWYgeW91IGFy ZSBvdXQgdGhlcmUgc2F5aW5nLCAib2gsIHdoeSBkaWRuJ3QgSSBzcGVhayBzb29uZXI/IT8iLCBz cGVhayBub3cuLi4gSSdtIGludGVyZXN0ZWQgaW4gdGhpcywgYnV0IGhhdmUgb3RoZXIgaXJvbnMg aW4gdGhlIGZpcmUgYXMgd2VsbCwgc28gSSdkIGhhcHBpbHkgc3RlcCBhc2lkZSBmb3IgYW5vdGhl ciB2b2x1bnRlZXIuLi4gPg0KDQpCZXN0LA0KDQpEDQoNCjwgV3JpdHRlbiB1c2luZyBzcGVlY2gg cmVjb2duaXRpb24gc29mdHdhcmUgJi9vciBhbiBpUGFkIGtleWJvYXJkIGJ5IG15IGZhdCBmaW5n ZXJzLi4uIFBsZWFzZSBmb3JnaXZlIHNwZWxsaW5nIGFuZCBwdW5jdHVhdGlvbiBlcnJvcnMgPg0K DQpPbiBBdWcgMjAsIDIwMTIsIGF0IDU6NTAgUE0sICJHZW9mZnJleSBMYXl0b24iIDx3cml0ZXJn d2xASE9UTUFJTC5DT008bWFpbHRvOndyaXRlcmd3bEBIT1RNQUlMLkNPTT4+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQpI ZXJiLCBFZCwgQmlsbCBhbmQgYWxsIHlvdSBvdGhlciBBVEVHZXJzIC0NCg0KU28gd2hvJ3MgZ29p bmcgdG8gc3RlcCB1cCB0byB0aGUgcGxhdGUgdG8gdGFrZSBhIHN3aW5nIGF0IHRoYXQgZWx1c2l2 ZSBjdXJ2ZSBiYWxsIC0gYW4gZXNzYXkgZm9yIGFuIGFjYWRlbWljIGpvdXJuYWwgKGFib3V0IDMs NTAwIHdvcmRzKT8NCg0KR2VvZmYgTGF5dG9uDQoNCj4gRGF0ZTogTW9uLCAyMCBBdWcgMjAxMiAx OTo0MzozNCArMDAwMA0KPiBGcm9tOiBzcHJ1aTF3Y0BDTUlDSC5FRFU8bWFpbHRvOnNwcnVpMXdj QENNSUNILkVEVT4NCj4gU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFF1aWNrIENvbW1vbiBDb3JlIHF1ZXN0aW9uDQo+ IFRvOiBBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU8bWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElP LkVEVT4NCj4NCj4gSGVyYiwgRWQsIGFuZCBHZW9mZnJleToNCj4NCj4gVGhhbmtzIGZvciB0aGUg aW5wdXQg4oCUIEkgd2FzIHN1c3BlY3RpbmcgdGhhdCBtYW55IG9mIHRoZSBncmFtbWFyLXJlbGF0 ZWQgc3RhbmRhcmRzIHdlcmUgaW4gcm91Z2hseSB0aGUgc2FtZSBwb3NpdGlvbiBhcyB0aGF0IG9m IFNjaHJvZWRpbmdlcidzIGNhdCwgYW5kIHRoaXMgc2VlbXMgdG8gYmUgdGhlIGNhc2UuIEknZCB0 aGluayB0aGF0IGEgam91cm5hbCBwaWVjZSB3b3VsZCBiZSB1c2VmdWwsIGVzcGVjaWFsbHkgaWYg aXQgaGFzIGFueSBjaGFuY2UgYXQgYWxsIG9mIHNwdXJyaW5nIGFueW9uZSBpbiB0aGUgQ0MgaW5p dGlhdGl2ZSB0byBtYWtlIGEgc3RhdGVtZW50IG9uZSB3YXkgb3IgYW5vdGhlci4gT2YgY291cnNl LCB0aGUgaW5kZXRlcm1pbmFjeSBpdHNlbGYgbWF5IGJlIHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlIHN1Z2FyIGhlbHBp bmcgdGhlIG1lZGljaW5lIGdvIGRvd24uDQo+DQo+IFNpbmNlcmVseSwNCj4NCj4gQmlsbCBTLg0K Pg0KPiBGcm9tOiBHZW9mZnJleSBMYXl0b24gPHdyaXRlcmd3bEBIT1RNQUlMLkNPTTxtYWlsdG86 d3JpdGVyZ3dsQEhPVE1BSUwuQ09NPjxtYWlsdG86d3JpdGVyZ3dsQEhPVE1BSUwuQ09NPj4NCj4g UmVwbHktVG86IEFURUcgRW5nbGlzaCBHcmFtbWFyIDxBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU8 bWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVT48bWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVP SElPLkVEVT4+DQo+IERhdGU6IE1vbmRheSwgQXVndXN0IDIwLCAyMDEyIDEyOjI5IFBNDQo+IFRv OiBBVEVHIEVuZ2xpc2ggR3JhbW1hciA8QVRFR0BMSVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURVPG1haWx0bzpB VEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU+PG1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU+ Pg0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUXVpY2sgQ29tbW9uIENvcmUgcXVlc3Rpb24NCj4NCj4gQ2FuIHdl IGdldCBhbiBhcnRpY2xlIGZvciB0aGUgQVRFRyBKb3VybmFsIG91dCBvZiB0aGlzIGRpc2N1c3Np b24/DQo+DQo+IEdlb2ZmIExheXRvbg0KPg0KPiA+IERhdGU6IE1vbiwgMjAgQXVnIDIwMTIgMTY6 MjY6MzQgKzAwMDANCj4gPiBGcm9tOiBldmF2cmFAUENULkVEVTxtYWlsdG86ZXZhdnJhQFBDVC5F RFU+PG1haWx0bzpldmF2cmFAUENULkVEVT4NCj4gPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUXVpY2sgQ29tbW9u IENvcmUgcXVlc3Rpb24NCj4gPiBUbzogQVRFR0BMSVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURVPG1haWx0bzpB VEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU+PG1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU+ DQo+ID4NCj4gPiBCaWxsLA0KPiA+IFRoYW5rcyBmb3IgYXNraW5nIHRoaXMgcXVlc3Rpb24uIElu IGFkZGl0aW9uIHRvIGxvb2tpbmcgYXQgdGhlIENDIHN0YW5kYXJkcywgSSd2ZSBsb29rZWQgYXQg dGhvc2Ugb2YgYSBmZXcgc3RhdGVzLCBpbmNsdWRpbmcgc2FtcGxlIGV4YW1zLiBJIGNhbiBmaW5k IG5vdGhpbmcgdGhhdCBzdWdnZXN0cyBzcGVjaWZpYyBtZXRhbGluZ3Vpc3RpYyBrbm93bGVkZ2Uu IEkgcmVtZW1iZXIgc2VlaW5nIHNvbWV3aGVyZSB0aGF0IHN0dWRlbnRzIHNob3VsZCBiZSBhYmxl IHRvIGlkZW50aWZ5IHZlcmJzLCBidXQgdGhhdCBzdGF0ZW1lbnQgaXRzZWxmIGlzIHZhZ3VlLiBJ ZGVudGlmeWluZyBmaW5pdGUgdmVyYnMgaW4gc2ltcGxlIHNlbnRlbmNlcyBpcyByZWxhdGl2ZWx5 IGVhc3ksIGJ1dCBpZGVudGlmeWluZyB2ZXJicyBpbiB0aGVpciBvd24gd3JpdGluZyBpcyBhbm90 aGVyIHF1ZXN0aW9uLiBJJ20gaG9waW5nIHRoYXQgeW91IGdldCBtb3JlIHJlc3BvbnNlcy4NCj4g PiBFZCBWLg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gPiBGcm9tOiBB c3NlbWJseSBmb3IgdGhlIFRlYWNoaW5nIG9mIEVuZ2xpc2ggR3JhbW1hciBbbWFpbHRvOkFURUdA TElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVV0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIFNwcnVpZWxsLCBXaWxsaWFtIEMNCj4g PiBTZW50OiBTYXR1cmRheSwgQXVndXN0IDE4LCAyMDEyIDQ6MDEgUE0NCj4gPiBUbzogQVRFR0BM SVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURVPG1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU+PG1haWx0 bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU+DQo+ID4gU3ViamVjdDogUXVpY2sgQ29tbW9uIENv cmUgcXVlc3Rpb24NCj4gPg0KPiA+IEhpIGFsbCAtLQ0KPiA+DQo+ID4gSSdtIGxhemlseSBhdHRl bXB0aW5nIHRvIGRyYXcgb24gQVRFRydzIGNvbGxlY3RpdmUgZXhwZXJpZW5jZSwgbGFyZ2VseSBi ZWNhdXNlIEkndmUgZGlzY292ZXJlZCB0aGF0IGVkdWNhdGlvbmFsIGJ1cmVhdWNyYWNpZXMgaW5l dml0YWJseSB0aGluayBvZiBhIGRpZmZlcmVudCBuYW1lIHRvIGZpbGUgc29tZXRoaW5nIHVuZGVy IHRoYW4gSSBkby4gSSdtIGluIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzIG9mIG1ha2luZyBzdXJlIHRoZSBFbmdsaXNo LWVkIGdyYW1tYXIgc2VjdGlvbnMgSSdtIGFib3V0IHRvIHRlYWNoIGFkZHJlc3MgdGhlIENvbW1v biBDb3JlIGRpcmVjdGx5LiBUaGUgQ0MgaGFzIGEgbnVtYmVyIG9mIHN0YXRlbWVudHMgdGhhdCBh cmUgYW1iaWd1b3VzIGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXIgd2hhdCdzIGJlaW5nIGFza2VkIGZvciBoYXMgdG8g ZG8gd2l0aCBzdHVkZW50cyBzaW1wbHkgInByb2R1Y2luZyBhIGNvbnN0cnVjdGlvbiIsIG9yIChp bnN0ZWFkKSBoYXZpbmcgY29uc2Npb3VzIG1ldGFsaW5ndWlzdGljIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBpdC4g QXMgYW4gZXhhbXBsZSwgYXQgb25lIHBvaW50IHRoZSBDQyBzYXlzIHRoYXQgc3R1ZGVudHMgYXQg Z3JhZGUgZWlnaHQgc2hvdWxkICJmb3JtIGFuZCB1c2UgdmVyYnMgaW4gdGhlIGFjdGl2ZSBhbmQg cGFzc2l2ZSB2b2ljZSIgKEknZCB3YW50ICJ2b2ljZXMiIHRoZXJlLCBidXQgdGhhdCdzIHByb2Jh Ymx5IHB1c2hpbmcgdGhpbmdzKS4gTmF0aXZlIEVuZ2xpc2gtc3BlYWtlcnMgd2l0aG91dCBzb21l IGtpbmQgb2YgbGFuZ3VhZ2UgaW1wYWlybWVudCB3aWxsIGZvcm0gYW5kIHVzZSBhY3RpdmVzIGFu ZCBwYXNzaXZlcywgb2YgY291cnNlIC0tIGp1c3QgcmVjb3JkIHRoZW0gbG9uZyBlbm91Z2ggYW5k IHlvdSdsbCBnZXQgYm90aC4gUmVhZCBvbmUgd2F5LCBhIGxhcmdlIHNldCBvZiB0aGVzZSBDQyBv YmplY3RpdmVzIGJhc2ljYWxseSBib2lsIGRvd24gdG8sICJkZXRlcm1pbmUgaWYgYW55IG9mIHlv dXIgc3R1ZGVudHMgYXJlIHNlY29uZCBsYW5ndWFnZSBsZWFybmVycyBvciBoYXZlIGxhbmd1YWdl IGltcGFpcm1lbnRzIjsgcmVhZCBhbm90aGVyLCB0aGV5J3JlIGluc3RlYWQgImRldGVybWluZSBp ZiB5b3VyIHN0dWRlbnRzIGhhdmUgc3BlY2lmaWMgbWV0YWxpbmd1aXN0aWMga25vd2xlZGdlLiIN Cj4gPg0KPiA+IElzIHRoZXJlIGFueXRoaW5nIGFwcHJvYWNoaW5nIGFuIG9mZmljaWFsIHN0YXRl bWVudCBhYm91dCB3aGljaCBvbmUgb2YgdGhvc2UgcmVhZGluZ3MgaXMgaW50ZW5kZWQ/IElmIHNv LCBkb2VzIGFueW9uZSBrbm93IHdoZXJlIGl0IGlzPyBBcG9sb2dpZXMgaWYgSSdtIGFza2luZyBz b21ldGhpbmcgdGhhdCdzIHRvdGFsbHkgb2J2aW91cy4gVGhlIGNvdXJzZSBpcyBvbmUgSSBoYXZl bid0IHRhdWdodCBpbiBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiB5ZWFycywgYW5kIHRoZSBzd2l0Y2ggdG8gdGhlIEND IGluIG15IHN0YXRlIHdhcyBpbiB0aGUgZWFybHkgcGhhc2VzIHRoZSBsYXN0IHRpbWUgYXJvdW5k Lg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gU2luY2VyZWx5LA0KPiA+DQo+ID4gQmlsbCBTcHJ1aWVsbA0KPiA+DQo+ID4g VG8gam9pbiBvciBsZWF2ZSB0aGlzIExJU1RTRVJWIGxpc3QsIHBsZWFzZSB2aXNpdCB0aGUgbGlz dCdzIHdlYiBpbnRlcmZhY2UgYXQ6DQo+ID4gaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11b2hpby5lZHUvYXJj aGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5odG1sDQo+ID4gYW5kIHNlbGVjdCAiSm9pbiBvciBsZWF2ZSB0aGUgbGlzdCIN Cj4gPg0KPiA+IFZpc2l0IEFURUcncyB3ZWIgc2l0ZSBhdCBodHRwOi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvDQo+ID4N Cj4gPiBUbyBqb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoaXMgTElTVFNFUlYgbGlzdCwgcGxlYXNlIHZpc2l0IHRo ZSBsaXN0J3Mgd2ViIGludGVyZmFjZSBhdDoNCj4gPiBodHRwOi8vbGlzdHNlcnYubXVvaGlvLmVk dS9hcmNoaXZlcy9hdGVnLmh0bWwNCj4gPiBhbmQgc2VsZWN0ICJKb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoZSBs aXN0Ig0KPiA+DQo+ID4gVmlzaXQgQVRFRydzIHdlYiBzaXRlIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly9hdGVnLm9yZy8N Cj4gVG8gam9pbiBvciBsZWF2ZSB0aGlzIExJU1RTRVJWIGxpc3QsIHBsZWFzZSB2aXNpdCB0aGUg bGlzdCdzIHdlYiBpbnRlcmZhY2UgYXQ6IGh0dHA6Ly9saXN0c2Vydi5tdW9oaW8uZWR1L2FyY2hp dmVzL2F0ZWcuaHRtbCBhbmQgc2VsZWN0ICJKb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoZSBsaXN0Ig0KPg0KPiBW aXNpdCBBVEVHJ3Mgd2ViIHNpdGUgYXQgaHR0cDovL2F0ZWcub3JnLw0KPg0KPiBUbyBqb2luIG9y IGxlYXZlIHRoaXMgTElTVFNFUlYgbGlzdCwgcGxlYXNlIHZpc2l0IHRoZSBsaXN0J3Mgd2ViIGlu dGVyZmFjZSBhdDoNCj4gaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11b2hpby5lZHUvYXJjaGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5o dG1sDQo+IGFuZCBzZWxlY3QgIkpvaW4gb3IgbGVhdmUgdGhlIGxpc3QiDQo+DQo+IFZpc2l0IEFU RUcncyB3ZWIgc2l0ZSBhdCBodHRwOi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvDQpUbyBqb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoaXMg TElTVFNFUlYgbGlzdCwgcGxlYXNlIHZpc2l0IHRoZSBsaXN0J3Mgd2ViIGludGVyZmFjZSBhdDog aHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11b2hpby5lZHUvYXJjaGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5odG1sIGFuZCBzZWxlY3Qg IkpvaW4gb3IgbGVhdmUgdGhlIGxpc3QiDQoNClZpc2l0IEFURUcncyB3ZWIgc2l0ZSBhdCBodHRw Oi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvDQo --_000_994B1DDEC62548B490B02B9CFE9D2AF6uscupstateedu_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+PGhlYWQ+PC9oZWFkPjxib2R5IGJnY29sb3I9IiNGRkZGRkYiPjxkaXY+SSBtaWdodCBi ZSB3aWxsaW5nLi4uIFdoZW4gZG8geW91IG5lZWQgaXQ/PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRp dj4mbHQ7IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgb3V0IHRoZXJlIHNheWluZywgIm9oLCB3aHkgZGlkbid0IEkgc3Bl YWsgc29vbmVyPyE/Iiwgc3BlYWsgbm93Li4uIEknbSBpbnRlcmVzdGVkIGluIHRoaXMsIGJ1dCBo YXZlIG90aGVyIGlyb25zIGluIHRoZSBmaXJlIGFzIHdlbGwsIHNvIEknZCBoYXBwaWx5IHN0ZXAg YXNpZGUgZm9yIGFub3RoZXIgdm9sdW50ZWVyLi4uICZndDs8YnI+PGJyPkJlc3QsPGRpdj48YnI+ PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5EPC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mbHQ7IFdyaXR0ZW4gdXNpbmcg c3BlZWNoJm5ic3A7cmVjb2duaXRpb24gc29mdHdhcmUgJmFtcDsvb3IgYW4gaVBhZCBrZXlib2Fy ZCBieSBteSBmYXQgZmluZ2Vycy4uLiBQbGVhc2UgZm9yZ2l2ZSBzcGVsbGluZyBhbmQgcHVuY3R1 YXRpb24mbmJzcDtlcnJvcnMgJmd0OzwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPk9uIEF1ZyAyMCwgMjAx MiwgYXQgNTo1MCBQTSwgIkdlb2ZmcmV5IExheXRvbiIgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzp3cml0 ZXJnd2xASE9UTUFJTC5DT00iPndyaXRlcmd3bEBIT1RNQUlMLkNPTTwvYT4mZ3Q7IHdyb3RlOjxi cj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48L2Rpdj48YmxvY2txdW90ZSB0eXBlPSJjaXRlIj48ZGl2Pg0KDQo8 c3R5bGU+PCEtLQ0KLmhtbWVzc2FnZSBQDQp7DQptYXJnaW46MHB4Ow0KcGFkZGluZzowcHgNCn0N CmJvZHkuaG1tZXNzYWdlDQp7DQpmb250LXNpemU6IDEwcHQ7DQpmb250LWZhbWlseTpUYWhvbWEN Cn0NCi0tPjwvc3R5bGU+DQo8ZGl2IGRpcj0ibHRyIj4NCkhlcmIsIEVkLCBCaWxsIGFuZCBhbGwg eW91IG90aGVyIEFURUdlcnMgLTxicj4mbmJzcDs8YnI+U28gd2hvJ3MgZ29pbmcgdG8gc3RlcCB1 cCB0byB0aGUgcGxhdGUgdG8gdGFrZSBhIHN3aW5nIGF0IHRoYXQgZWx1c2l2ZSBjdXJ2ZSBiYWxs IC0gYW4gZXNzYXkgZm9yIGFuIGFjYWRlbWljIGpvdXJuYWwgKGFib3V0IDMsNTAwIHdvcmRzKT88 YnI+PGJyPkdlb2ZmIExheXRvbjxicj4mbmJzcDs8YnI+PGRpdj48ZGl2IGlkPSJTa3lEcml2ZVBs YWNlaG9sZGVyIj48L2Rpdj4mZ3Q7IERhdGU6IE1vbiwgMjAgQXVnIDIwMTIgMTk6NDM6MzQgKzAw MDA8YnI+Jmd0OyBGcm9tOiA8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86c3BydWkxd2NAQ01JQ0guRURVIj5zcHJ1 aTF3Y0BDTUlDSC5FRFU8L2E+PGJyPiZndDsgU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFF1aWNrIENvbW1vbiBDb3Jl IHF1ZXN0aW9uPGJyPiZndDsgVG86IDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJ Ty5FRFUiPkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVTwvYT48YnI+Jmd0OyA8YnI+Jmd0OyBIZXJi LCBFZCwgYW5kIEdlb2ZmcmV5Ojxicj4mZ3Q7IDxicj4mZ3Q7IFRoYW5rcyBmb3IgdGhlIGlucHV0 IOKAlCBJIHdhcyBzdXNwZWN0aW5nIHRoYXQgbWFueSBvZiB0aGUgZ3JhbW1hci1yZWxhdGVkIHN0 YW5kYXJkcyB3ZXJlIGluIHJvdWdobHkgdGhlIHNhbWUgcG9zaXRpb24gYXMgdGhhdCBvZiBTY2hy b2VkaW5nZXIncyBjYXQsIGFuZCB0aGlzIHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIHRoZSBjYXNlLiBJJ2QgdGhpbmsg dGhhdCBhIGpvdXJuYWwgcGllY2Ugd291bGQgYmUgdXNlZnVsLCBlc3BlY2lhbGx5IGlmIGl0IGhh cyBhbnkgY2hhbmNlIGF0IGFsbCBvZiBzcHVycmluZyBhbnlvbmUgaW4gdGhlIENDIGluaXRpYXRp dmUgdG8gbWFrZSBhIHN0YXRlbWVudCBvbmUgd2F5IG9yIGFub3RoZXIuIE9mIGNvdXJzZSwgdGhl IGluZGV0ZXJtaW5hY3kgaXRzZWxmIG1heSBiZSBzb21lIG9mIHRoZSBzdWdhciBoZWxwaW5nIHRo ZSBtZWRpY2luZSBnbyBkb3duLjxicj4mZ3Q7IDxicj4mZ3Q7IFNpbmNlcmVseSw8YnI+Jmd0OyA8 YnI+Jmd0OyBCaWxsIFMuPGJyPiZndDsgPGJyPiZndDsgRnJvbTogR2VvZmZyZXkgTGF5dG9uICZs dDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86d3JpdGVyZ3dsQEhPVE1BSUwuQ09NIj53cml0ZXJnd2xASE9UTUFJ TC5DT008L2E+Jmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzp3cml0ZXJnd2xASE9UTUFJTC5DT00iPm1haWx0 bzp3cml0ZXJnd2xASE9UTUFJTC5DT008L2E+Jmd0OyZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyBSZXBseS1UbzogQVRF RyBFbmdsaXNoIEdyYW1tYXIgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJ Ty5FRFUiPkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVTwvYT4mbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOkFU RUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVSI+bWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVTwv YT4mZ3Q7Jmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7IERhdGU6IE1vbmRheSwgQXVndXN0IDIwLCAyMDEyIDEyOjI5IFBN PGJyPiZndDsgVG86IEFURUcgRW5nbGlzaCBHcmFtbWFyICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86QVRF R0BMSVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURVIj5BVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU8L2E+Jmx0Ozxh IGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFUiPm1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RT RVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU8L2E+Jmd0OyZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUXVpY2sgQ29t bW9uIENvcmUgcXVlc3Rpb248YnI+Jmd0OyA8YnI+Jmd0OyBDYW4gd2UgZ2V0IGFuIGFydGljbGUg Zm9yIHRoZSBBVEVHIEpvdXJuYWwgb3V0IG9mIHRoaXMgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbj88YnI+Jmd0OyA8YnI+ Jmd0OyBHZW9mZiBMYXl0b248YnI+Jmd0OyA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IERhdGU6IE1vbiwgMjAgQXVn IDIwMTIgMTY6MjY6MzQgKzAwMDA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IEZyb206IDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpl dmF2cmFAUENULkVEVSI+ZXZhdnJhQFBDVC5FRFU8L2E+Jmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpldmF2 cmFAUENULkVEVSI+bWFpbHRvOmV2YXZyYUBQQ1QuRURVPC9hPiZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IFN1 YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBRdWljayBDb21tb24gQ29yZSBxdWVzdGlvbjxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgVG86IDxh IGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFUiPkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVP SElPLkVEVTwvYT4mbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVSI+ bWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVTwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxicj4m Z3Q7ICZndDsgQmlsbCw8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IFRoYW5rcyBmb3IgYXNraW5nIHRoaXMgcXVlc3Rp b24uIEluIGFkZGl0aW9uIHRvIGxvb2tpbmcgYXQgdGhlIENDIHN0YW5kYXJkcywgSSd2ZSBsb29r ZWQgYXQgdGhvc2Ugb2YgYSBmZXcgc3RhdGVzLCBpbmNsdWRpbmcgc2FtcGxlIGV4YW1zLiBJIGNh biBmaW5kIG5vdGhpbmcgdGhhdCBzdWdnZXN0cyBzcGVjaWZpYyBtZXRhbGluZ3Vpc3RpYyBrbm93 bGVkZ2UuIEkgcmVtZW1iZXIgc2VlaW5nIHNvbWV3aGVyZSB0aGF0IHN0dWRlbnRzIHNob3VsZCBi ZSBhYmxlIHRvIGlkZW50aWZ5IHZlcmJzLCBidXQgdGhhdCBzdGF0ZW1lbnQgaXRzZWxmIGlzIHZh Z3VlLiBJZGVudGlmeWluZyBmaW5pdGUgdmVyYnMgaW4gc2ltcGxlIHNlbnRlbmNlcyBpcyByZWxh dGl2ZWx5IGVhc3ksIGJ1dCBpZGVudGlmeWluZyB2ZXJicyBpbiB0aGVpciBvd24gd3JpdGluZyBp cyBhbm90aGVyIHF1ZXN0aW9uLiBJJ20gaG9waW5nIHRoYXQgeW91IGdldCBtb3JlIHJlc3BvbnNl cy48YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IEVkIFYuPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgLS0tLS1Pcmln aW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS08YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IEZyb206IEFzc2VtYmx5IGZvciB0aGUgVGVh Y2hpbmcgb2YgRW5nbGlzaCBHcmFtbWFyIFttYWlsdG86QVRFR0BMSVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURV XSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgU3BydWllbGwsIFdpbGxpYW0gQzxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgU2VudDogU2F0 dXJkYXksIEF1Z3VzdCAxOCwgMjAxMiA0OjAxIFBNPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBUbzogPGEgaHJlZj0i bWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVSI+QVRFR0BMSVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURV PC9hPiZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86QVRFR0BMSVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURVIj5tYWlsdG86 QVRFR0BMSVNUU0VSVi5NVU9ISU8uRURVPC9hPiZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IFN1YmplY3Q6IFF1 aWNrIENvbW1vbiBDb3JlIHF1ZXN0aW9uPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgSGkgYWxs IC0tPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgSSdtIGxhemlseSBhdHRlbXB0aW5nIHRvIGRy YXcgb24gQVRFRydzIGNvbGxlY3RpdmUgZXhwZXJpZW5jZSwgbGFyZ2VseSBiZWNhdXNlIEkndmUg ZGlzY292ZXJlZCB0aGF0IGVkdWNhdGlvbmFsIGJ1cmVhdWNyYWNpZXMgaW5ldml0YWJseSB0aGlu ayBvZiBhIGRpZmZlcmVudCBuYW1lIHRvIGZpbGUgc29tZXRoaW5nIHVuZGVyIHRoYW4gSSBkby4g SSdtIGluIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzIG9mIG1ha2luZyBzdXJlIHRoZSBFbmdsaXNoLWVkIGdyYW1tYXIg c2VjdGlvbnMgSSdtIGFib3V0IHRvIHRlYWNoIGFkZHJlc3MgdGhlIENvbW1vbiBDb3JlIGRpcmVj dGx5LiBUaGUgQ0MgaGFzIGEgbnVtYmVyIG9mIHN0YXRlbWVudHMgdGhhdCBhcmUgYW1iaWd1b3Vz IGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXIgd2hhdCdzIGJlaW5nIGFza2VkIGZvciBoYXMgdG8gZG8gd2l0aCBzdHVk ZW50cyBzaW1wbHkgInByb2R1Y2luZyBhIGNvbnN0cnVjdGlvbiIsIG9yIChpbnN0ZWFkKSBoYXZp bmcgY29uc2Npb3VzIG1ldGFsaW5ndWlzdGljIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBpdC4gQXMgYW4gZXhhbXBs ZSwgYXQgb25lIHBvaW50IHRoZSBDQyBzYXlzIHRoYXQgc3R1ZGVudHMgYXQgZ3JhZGUgZWlnaHQg c2hvdWxkICJmb3JtIGFuZCB1c2UgdmVyYnMgaW4gdGhlIGFjdGl2ZSBhbmQgcGFzc2l2ZSB2b2lj ZSIgKEknZCB3YW50ICJ2b2ljZXMiIHRoZXJlLCBidXQgdGhhdCdzIHByb2JhYmx5IHB1c2hpbmcg dGhpbmdzKS4gTmF0aXZlIEVuZ2xpc2gtc3BlYWtlcnMgd2l0aG91dCBzb21lIGtpbmQgb2YgbGFu Z3VhZ2UgaW1wYWlybWVudCB3aWxsIGZvcm0gYW5kIHVzZSBhY3RpdmVzIGFuZCBwYXNzaXZlcywg b2YgY291cnNlIC0tIGp1c3QgcmVjb3JkIHRoZW0gbG9uZyBlbm91Z2ggYW5kIHlvdSdsbCBnZXQg Ym90aC4gUmVhZCBvbmUgd2F5LCBhIGxhcmdlIHNldCBvZiB0aGVzZSBDQyBvYmplY3RpdmVzIGJh c2ljYWxseSBib2lsIGRvd24gdG8sICJkZXRlcm1pbmUgaWYgYW55IG9mIHlvdXIgc3R1ZGVudHMg YXJlIHNlY29uZCBsYW5ndWFnZSBsZWFybmVycyBvciBoYXZlIGxhbmd1YWdlIGltcGFpcm1lbnRz IjsgcmVhZCBhbm90aGVyLCB0aGV5J3JlIGluc3RlYWQgImRldGVybWluZSBpZiB5b3VyIHN0dWRl bnRzIGhhdmUgc3BlY2lmaWMgbWV0YWxpbmd1aXN0aWMga25vd2xlZGdlLiI8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7 PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBJcyB0aGVyZSBhbnl0aGluZyBhcHByb2FjaGluZyBhbiBvZmZpY2lhbCBz dGF0ZW1lbnQgYWJvdXQgd2hpY2ggb25lIG9mIHRob3NlIHJlYWRpbmdzIGlzIGludGVuZGVkPyBJ ZiBzbywgZG9lcyBhbnlvbmUga25vdyB3aGVyZSBpdCBpcz8gQXBvbG9naWVzIGlmIEknbSBhc2tp bmcgc29tZXRoaW5nIHRoYXQncyB0b3RhbGx5IG9idmlvdXMuIFRoZSBjb3Vyc2UgaXMgb25lIEkg aGF2ZW4ndCB0YXVnaHQgaW4gYSBjb3VwbGUgb2YgeWVhcnMsIGFuZCB0aGUgc3dpdGNoIHRvIHRo ZSBDQyBpbiBteSBzdGF0ZSB3YXMgaW4gdGhlIGVhcmx5IHBoYXNlcyB0aGUgbGFzdCB0aW1lIGFy b3VuZC48YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBTaW5jZXJlbHksPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxi cj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgQmlsbCBTcHJ1aWVsbDxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IFRvIGpv aW4gb3IgbGVhdmUgdGhpcyBMSVNUU0VSViBsaXN0LCBwbGVhc2UgdmlzaXQgdGhlIGxpc3QncyB3 ZWIgaW50ZXJmYWNlIGF0Ojxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11 b2hpby5lZHUvYXJjaGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5odG1sIj5odHRwOi8vbGlzdHNlcnYubXVvaGlvLmVkdS9h cmNoaXZlcy9hdGVnLmh0bWw8L2E+PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBhbmQgc2VsZWN0ICJKb2luIG9yIGxl YXZlIHRoZSBsaXN0Ijxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IFZpc2l0IEFURUcncyB3ZWIg c2l0ZSBhdCA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvIj5odHRwOi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvPC9hPjxi cj4mZ3Q7ICZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IFRvIGpvaW4gb3IgbGVhdmUgdGhpcyBMSVNUU0VSViBs aXN0LCBwbGVhc2UgdmlzaXQgdGhlIGxpc3QncyB3ZWIgaW50ZXJmYWNlIGF0Ojxicj4mZ3Q7ICZn dDsgPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11b2hpby5lZHUvYXJjaGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5odG1s Ij5odHRwOi8vbGlzdHNlcnYubXVvaGlvLmVkdS9hcmNoaXZlcy9hdGVnLmh0bWw8L2E+PGJyPiZn dDsgJmd0OyBhbmQgc2VsZWN0ICJKb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoZSBsaXN0Ijxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDs8 YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IFZpc2l0IEFURUcncyB3ZWIgc2l0ZSBhdCA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vYXRl Zy5vcmcvIj5odHRwOi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvPC9hPjxicj4mZ3Q7IFRvIGpvaW4gb3IgbGVhdmUgdGhp cyBMSVNUU0VSViBsaXN0LCBwbGVhc2UgdmlzaXQgdGhlIGxpc3QncyB3ZWIgaW50ZXJmYWNlIGF0 OiA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vbGlzdHNlcnYubXVvaGlvLmVkdS9hcmNoaXZlcy9hdGVnLmh0bWwi Pmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0c2Vydi5tdW9oaW8uZWR1L2FyY2hpdmVzL2F0ZWcuaHRtbDwvYT4gYW5kIHNl bGVjdCAiSm9pbiBvciBsZWF2ZSB0aGUgbGlzdCI8YnI+Jmd0OyA8YnI+Jmd0OyBWaXNpdCBBVEVH J3Mgd2ViIHNpdGUgYXQgPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL2F0ZWcub3JnLyI+aHR0cDovL2F0ZWcub3Jn LzwvYT48YnI+Jmd0OyA8YnI+Jmd0OyBUbyBqb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoaXMgTElTVFNFUlYgbGlz dCwgcGxlYXNlIHZpc2l0IHRoZSBsaXN0J3Mgd2ViIGludGVyZmFjZSBhdDo8YnI+Jmd0OyAgICAg IDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly9saXN0c2Vydi5tdW9oaW8uZWR1L2FyY2hpdmVzL2F0ZWcuaHRtbCI+ aHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11b2hpby5lZHUvYXJjaGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5odG1sPC9hPjxicj4mZ3Q7 IGFuZCBzZWxlY3QgIkpvaW4gb3IgbGVhdmUgdGhlIGxpc3QiPGJyPiZndDsgPGJyPiZndDsgVmlz aXQgQVRFRydzIHdlYiBzaXRlIGF0IDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly9hdGVnLm9yZy8iPmh0dHA6Ly9h dGVnLm9yZy88L2E+PGJyPjwvZGl2PiAJCSAJICAgCQkgIDwvZGl2Pg0KVG8gam9pbiBvciBsZWF2 ZSB0aGlzIExJU1RTRVJWIGxpc3QsIHBsZWFzZSB2aXNpdCB0aGUgbGlzdCdzIHdlYiBpbnRlcmZh Y2UgYXQ6DQogICAgIDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly9saXN0c2Vydi5tdW9oaW8uZWR1L2FyY2hpdmVz L2F0ZWcuaHRtbCI+aHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11b2hpby5lZHUvYXJjaGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5odG1s PC9hPg0KYW5kIHNlbGVjdCAiSm9pbiBvciBsZWF2ZSB0aGUgbGlzdCINCjxwPg0KVmlzaXQgQVRF RydzIHdlYiBzaXRlIGF0IDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly9hdGVnLm9yZy8iPmh0dHA6Ly9hdGVnLm9y Zy88L2E+DQo8L3A+PC9kaXY+PC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPjwvYm9keT48L2h0bWw+ --_000_994B1DDEC62548B490B02B9CFE9D2AF6uscupstateedu_-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:19:46 +0000 From: "Hancock, Craig G" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF6436774CF4BY2PRD0411MB415_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At one point, I read many sets of state standards and found some consistent patterns that the common core standards largely extend. For the most part, grammar is thought of as a behavior. So it's not surprising that the focus would be on "demonstrating mastery" of standard English or punctuation, those elements that make writing most obviously different from everyday speech. Since the sixties, there has been a concerted resistance to knowledge about language, the major argument being that "formal grammar taught in isolation" doesn't improve writing. There is also a philosophical consensus, for better or worse, that language is acquired naturally and that we don't need to teach a native speaker the grammar of their own language in order for that to happen. The attention is and has been on the differences between the features of that spoken language and standard English and on the differences between the demands of language as speech and language as represented in written form. The consensus for some time has been that this transition can be accomplished through response to actual writing and should be accomplished with as little metalanguage as possible. The conversation has largely been around what it is "necessary" to know, with soft explanations acceptable. If we respond to individual needs of classes or students and have behavior (rather than knowledge) as a goal, then there is nothing to build on year after year. We can test students on whether they can recognize "error," but can't test them on knowledge about language precisely because that knowledge has never been valued and has never been built in any kind of serious or systematic way. I'm curious about what it means to vary syntax "for effect." Varied syntax is essential to clarity, coherence, emphasis, and so on. Once again, though, it's couched in behavioral terms. students aren't being asked to recognize the ways in which meaning is built through syntactic choice. Recognition of register differences are also more social (and superficial). Even dismissing all the elements of nonstandard language, language differs enormously for different kinds of text, most particularly within the technical disciplines. Most of the state standards I have looked at value "literary elements," but seem oblivious to the complex demands of technical and academic texts. Craig ________________________________ From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of John Chorazy [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:45 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question A few Language Standards for 11-12 grades (with my parenthetical annotations): 1. Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking (I'd agree there is no specific demand here for a language set that describes the conventions, but there is broad room for introducing it and for students to employ it in order to fulfill the requirements of an ELA course. The Standards aren't the end or the all of the curriculum, they're a framework for "college readiness"... though maybe that's another discussion in itself...). a. Apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested (How does one apply this understanding without a common language set to engage in a productive conversation? I think there's plenty of room for the classroom teacher here, necessarily). b. Resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g.Merriam- Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, Garner’s Modern American Usage) as needed (Same as above, I'd say. Complex issues demand a complex jargon). 3. Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when reading or listening (This is clearly metaknowledge, though I still agree with Ed that nothing is demanded in specific terms.). a. Vary syntax for effect, consulting references (e.g., Tufte’s Artful Sentences) for guidance as needed; apply an understanding of syntax to the study of complex texts when reading (When students are asked to apply or demonstrate knowledge, it's going to be up to the classroom teacher to determine how that's satisfied. But the suggestion of a guiding text (Tufte or any other) is a nod toward the need for complex and expert information to resolve complex issues). To go back a bit, the Standards state that 5th graders should be able to use correlative conjunctions, explain the functions of conjunctions and prepositions, and form and use various verb tenses; by grade 8, students should be able to Explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences and Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening. None of that is done without metacognition and application of at least a few terms regarding grammar - though I'm aware that the slant is pitched away from using such terms because their practicality is questioned. I think it will be interesting to see what's on the state tests, frankly; the Consortia who are determining the high stakes assessments for the Standards are the ones who'll have the final interpretation. My sense is that there won't be any questions "about" grammar in sight... but embedded within the questions and readings will be a need for a rich understanding of the complexities of language, especially by 11-12th grades. Sincerely, John On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ed Vavra <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Bill, > Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses. > Ed V. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Quick Common Core question > > Hi all -- > > I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge." > > Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around. > > Sincerely, > > Bill Spruiell > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ -- John Chorazy English II and III, Academic and Honors Advisor, Panther Press Pequannock Township High School 973.616.6000 To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF6436774CF4BY2PRD0411MB415_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    At one point, I read many sets of state standards and found some consistent patterns that the common core standards largely extend. For the most part, grammar is thought of as a behavior. So it's not surprising that the focus would be on "demonstrating mastery" of standard English or punctuation, those elements that make writing most obviously different from everyday speech.    
  Since the sixties, there has been a concerted resistance to knowledge about language, the major argument being that "formal grammar taught in isolation" doesn't improve writing. There is also a philosophical consensus, for better or worse, that language is acquired naturally and that we don't need to teach a native speaker the grammar of their own language in order for that to happen. The attention is and has been on the differences between the features of that spoken language and standard English and on the differences between the demands of language as speech and language as represented in written form. The consensus for some time has been that this transition can be accomplished through response to actual writing and should be accomplished with as little metalanguage as possible. The conversation has largely been around what it is "necessary" to know, with soft explanations acceptable. If we respond to individual needs of classes or students and have behavior (rather than knowledge) as a goal, then there is nothing to build on year after year. We can test students on whether they can recognize "error," but can't test them on knowledge about language precisely because that knowledge has never been valued and has never been built in any kind of serious or systematic way.
    I'm curious about what it means to vary syntax "for effect." Varied syntax is essential to clarity, coherence, emphasis, and so on. Once again, though, it's couched in behavioral terms. students aren't being asked to recognize the ways in which meaning is built through syntactic choice.
    Recognition of register differences are also more social (and superficial). Even dismissing all the elements of nonstandard language, language differs enormously for different kinds of text, most particularly within the technical disciplines. Most of the state standards I have looked at value "literary elements," but seem oblivious to the complex demands of technical and academic texts.

Craig
     

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of John Chorazy [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question

A few Language Standards for 11-12 grades (with my parenthetical annotations):
 
1. Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking (I'd agree there is no specific demand here for a language set that describes the conventions, but there is broad room for introducing it and for students to employ it in order to fulfill the requirements of an ELA course. The Standards aren't the end or the all of the curriculum, they're a framework for "college readiness"... though maybe that's another discussion in itself...).
 
a. Apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested (How does one apply this understanding without a common language set to engage in a productive conversation? I think there's plenty of room for the classroom teacher here, necessarily).
 
b. Resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g.Merriam- Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, Garner’s Modern American Usage) as needed (Same as above, I'd say. Complex issues demand a complex jargon).
 
3. Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when reading or listening (This is clearly metaknowledge, though I still agree with Ed that nothing is demanded in specific terms.).
 
a. Vary syntax for effect, consulting references (e.g., Tufte’s Artful Sentences) for guidance as needed; apply an understanding of syntax to the study of complex texts when reading (When students are asked to apply or demonstrate knowledge, it's going to be up to the classroom teacher to determine how that's satisfied. But the suggestion of a guiding text (Tufte or any other) is a nod toward the need for complex and expert information to resolve complex issues).
 
To go back a bit, the Standards state that 5th graders should be able to use correlative conjunctions, explain the functions of conjunctions and prepositions, and form and use various verb tenses; by grade 8, students should be able to Explain the function of verbals (gerunds, participles, infinitives) in general and their function in particular sentences and Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening. None of that is done without metacognition and application of at least a few terms regarding grammar - though I'm aware that the slant is pitched away from using such terms because their practicality is questioned.
 
I think it will be interesting to see what's on the state tests, frankly; the Consortia who are determining the high stakes assessments for the Standards are the ones who'll have the final interpretation. My sense is that there won't be any questions "about" grammar in sight... but embedded within the questions and readings will be a need for a rich understanding of the complexities of language, especially by 11-12th grades.
 
Sincerely,
 
John
 
 
 
 
 
 
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ed Vavra <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Bill,
> Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses.
> Ed V.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM
> Subject: Quick Common Core question
>
> Hi all --
>
> I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge."
>
> Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Bill Spruiell
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
 
 
 
 
--
John Chorazy
English II and III, Academic and Honors
Advisor, Panther Press
Pequannock Township High School
973.616.6000
 
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF6436774CF4BY2PRD0411MB415_-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:26:20 -0500 From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question --_1f677562-dcaa-4595-aa16-19b08a9f5b3b_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David - You're in luck! How does the end of the fall semester look to you - say mid-December? Geoff Layton Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:11:15 -0400 From: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question To: [log in to unmask] I might be willing... When do you need it? < If you are out there saying, "oh, why didn't I speak sooner?!?", speak now... I'm interested in this, but have other irons in the fire as well, so I'd happily step aside for another volunteer... > Best, D < Written using speech recognition software &/or an iPad keyboard by my fat fingers... Please forgive spelling and punctuation errors > On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:50 PM, "Geoffrey Layton" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Herb, Ed, Bill and all you other ATEGers - So who's going to step up to the plate to take a swing at that elusive curve ball - an essay for an academic journal (about 3,500 words)? Geoff Layton > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:43:34 +0000 > From: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > To: [log in to unmask] > > Herb, Ed, and Geoffrey: > > Thanks for the input — I was suspecting that many of the grammar-related standards were in roughly the same position as that of Schroedinger's cat, and this seems to be the case. I'd think that a journal piece would be useful, especially if it has any chance at all of spurring anyone in the CC initiative to make a statement one way or another. Of course, the indeterminacy itself may be some of the sugar helping the medicine go down. > > Sincerely, > > Bill S. > > From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]> > Reply-To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Monday, August 20, 2012 12:29 PM > To: ATEG English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > > Can we get an article for the ATEG Journal out of this discussion? > > Geoff Layton > > > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:26:34 +0000 > > From: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question > > To: [log in to unmask] > > > > Bill, > > Thanks for asking this question. In addition to looking at the CC standards, I've looked at those of a few states, including sample exams. I can find nothing that suggests specific metalinguistic knowledge. I remember seeing somewhere that students should be able to identify verbs, but that statement itself is vague. Identifying finite verbs in simple sentences is relatively easy, but identifying verbs in their own writing is another question. I'm hoping that you get more responses. > > Ed V. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C > > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:01 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Quick Common Core question > > > > Hi all -- > > > > I'm lazily attempting to draw on ATEG's collective experience, largely because I've discovered that educational bureaucracies inevitably think of a different name to file something under than I do. I'm in the process of making sure the English-ed grammar sections I'm about to teach address the Common Core directly. The CC has a number of statements that are ambiguous as to whether what's being asked for has to do with students simply "producing a construction", or (instead) having conscious metalinguistic knowledge of it. As an example, at one point the CC says that students at grade eight should "form and use verbs in the active and passive voice" (I'd want "voices" there, but that's probably pushing things). Native English-speakers without some kind of language impairment will form and use actives and passives, of course -- just record them long enough and you'll get both. Read one way, a large set of these CC objectives basically boil down to, "determine if any of your students are second language learners or have language impairments"; read another, they're instead "determine if your students have specific metalinguistic knowledge." > > > > Is there anything approaching an official statement about which one of those readings is intended? If so, does anyone know where it is? Apologies if I'm asking something that's totally obvious. The course is one I haven't taught in a couple of years, and the switch to the CC in my state was in the early phases the last time around. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Bill Spruiell > > > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > > and select "Join or leave the list" > > > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > > and select "Join or leave the list" > > > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html > and select "Join or leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_1f677562-dcaa-4595-aa16-19b08a9f5b3b_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

David -
 
You're in luck! How does the end of the fall semester look to you - say mid-December?

Geoff Layton
 

Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:11:15 -0400
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Quick Common Core question
To: [log in to unmask]

I might be willing... When do you need it?

< If you are out there saying, "oh, why didn't I speak sooner?!?", speak now... I'm interested in this, but have other irons in the fire as well, so I'd happily step aside for another volunteer... >

Best,

D

< Written using speech recognition software &/or an iPad keyboard by my fat fingers... Please forgive spelling and punctuation errors >

On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:50 PM, "Geoffrey Layton" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Herb, Ed, Bill and all you other ATEGers -
 
So who's going to step up to the plate to take a swing at that elusive curve ball - an essay for an academic journal (about 3,500 words)?

Geoff Layton
 
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:43:34 +0000
> From: Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ------------------------------ End of ATEG Digest - 18 Aug 2012 to 20 Aug 2012 (#2012-74) ********************************************************** To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ========================================================================Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:03:12 -0700 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Comments: RFC822 error: Invalid RFC822 field - "Is anyone familiar with research on usage errors and me=". Rest of header flushed. From: Scott Woods <[log in to unmask]> Subject: 20 most common usage errors--research? evidence? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1600601909-750299031-1345960992=:11326" ---1600601909-750299031-1345960992=:11326 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Group,   Is anyone familiar with research on usage errors and methods for reducing them in students' work? What really works for reducing usage errors? What doesn't work? How should we think of usage errors? Do error reduction efforts work? What do they give us? While I don't want my students to make errors, I'm much more interested in improving their writing than in reducing their errors.   Thanks,   Scott Woods To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ---1600601909-750299031-1345960992=:11326 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Group,
 
Is anyone familiar with research on usage errors and methods for reducing them in students' work? What really works for reducing usage errors? What doesn't work? How should we think of usage errors? Do error reduction efforts work? What do they give us? While I don't want my students to make errors, I'm much more interested in improving their writing than in reducing their errors.
 
Thanks,
 
Scott Woods
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ---1600601909-750299031-1345960992=:11326-- ========================================================================Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:56:29 -0500 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: Robert Yates <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: 20 most common usage errors--research? evidence? In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary --0016e6da98d305b4d704c82c6a30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Scott, I think this is probably the most carefully done research on usage errors in American university student writing. http://www.inventio.us/ccc/1988/12/robert-j-connors-and-andrea-a.html Connors, Robert J., and Andrea A. Lunsford. "Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research."* CCC* 39.4 (1988): 395-409. Bob Yates University of Central Missouri On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Scott Woods <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear Group, > > Is anyone familiar with research on usage errors and methods for reducing > them in students' work? What really works for reducing usage errors? What > doesn't work? How should we think of usage errors? Do error reduction > efforts work? What do they give us? While I don't want my students to make > errors, I'm much more interested in improving their writing than in reducing > their errors. > > Thanks, > > Scott Woods > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface > at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or > leave the list" > > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --0016e6da98d305b4d704c82c6a30 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott,


I think this is probably the most carefully done research on usage errors in American university student writing.


Connors, Robert J., and Andrea A. Lunsford. "Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research." CCC 39.4 (1988): 395-409.

Bob Yates
University of Central Missouri


On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Scott Woods <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Dear Group,
 
Is anyone familiar with research on usage errors and methods for reducing them in students' work? What really works for reducing usage errors? What doesn't work? How should we think of usage errors? Do error reduction efforts work? What do they give us? While I don't want my students to make errors, I'm much more interested in improving their writing than in reducing their errors.
 
Thanks,
 
Scott Woods
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --0016e6da98d305b4d704c82c6a30-- ========================================================================Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:03:50 +0000 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: "Hancock, Craig G" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: 20 most common usage errors--research? evidence? In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF6436776620BY2PRD0411MB415_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF6436776620BY2PRD0411MB415_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What the Lansford/Connors study deomstrates is that there was a great deal of uncertainty in the 1980's about appropriate ways to respond to writing. In the 1960's, it was simply understood that English teachers were supposed to "correct" student papers, so much so that "correcting papers" was the usual term for it. In the 1970's, I was trained to "respond" to student writing "in process," and the professional consensus, however limited its reach might have been, is that it is not necessary and probably not useful to correct all the "errors" in a paper. Error could be dealt with in the context of higher order concerns. There was also a sense that individual students would find their own path toward correctness. that they would "acquire" a standard English while attention was on other things. The discovery that teachers varied enormously in what errors they attended to didn't surprise me at the time. Hillocks' meta-analysis of research (1986) focuses on those interventions that have proven to improve overall writing. They tossed out all studies that did not measure writing improvement through holistic assessment with well trained teachers and threw out studies that did not have control plus treatment groups. They tended to diminish the importance of surface level features. Here's an interesting passage from Hillocks about the Elley study (p. 138): "The grammar groups did outperform the no-grammar classes on a test of usage an mechanics. However, the researchers analyzed the items of the test to determine the precise nature of the differences. They found that the differences appeared in items on the use of capitals, commas in lists, the apostrophe, possessives and contractions, commas for appositives, and so forth--all of which appear to be amenable to direct, discreet instruction." This seems to me typical of the general bias in the field at this time away from any kind of systematic instruction in grammar. The evidence seemed to show that this sort of instruction did have effects that most of us would embrace (admittedly, in a grammar test, not in actual writing), but this is dismissed on the untested assumption that these could be addressed within the context of writing. The Elley study is typical in that the treatment group was given instruction in grammar while the control group was given instruction in reading and creative writing. The fact that the grammar group did better on a grammar test but not on actual writing shouldn't lead us to conclude that grammar study doesn't improve writing, particularly iof we think of literacy as something that develops through a wide range of experiences, practice in writing being absolutely essential. Hillocks does go on to say that there is no consensus on what level of mechanical performance is "acceptable" and no proven techniques for accomplishing that. The Graham and Perrin meta-analysis (2007) pretty much echoes Hillocks in saying that formal grammar, taught in isolation, does not demonstrably improve writing when pre and post tested against control groups. Both studies say that sentence combining does work and there seems evidence that it works best when accompanied by conversation about language. As Myhill points out in her essay in "Beyond the Grammar Wars" (locke, 2010), "Perhaps the absence of a cogent rationale for advocating grammar to improve children's writing is because, as yet, therre is no theoretical framework within which to locate the discussion." In other words, you first have to theorize a connection and then test the efficacy of that when put into practice. Myhill does exactly that in the Exeter study. (http://education.exeter.ac.uk/projects.php?id=419). Students and teachers are led to pay explicit attention to language within the context of their language, and the imporvments are statistically significant. My position for a long time has been that you cannot teach writing by remediating deficiencies. On the other hand, students can benefit enormously from knowing about the hurdles they are expected to clear and knowing enough about language to meet those challenges, or at least place them within context. The operative question for me has been what knowledge about language can help students negotiate the complex language tasks that matter to them. I try to frame this in terms of constructing competence. To the extent that we treat language as a "behavior" that needs to be "corrected" we will fail, especially when we try to avoid a deeper understanding of the dynamics of language as we do so. Craig From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Robert Yates [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 10:56 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: 20 most common usage errors--research? evidence? Scott, I think this is probably the most carefully done research on usage errors in American university student writing. http://www.inventio.us/ccc/1988/12/robert-j-connors-and-andrea-a.html Connors, Robert J., and Andrea A. Lunsford. "Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research." CCC 39.4 (1988): 395-409. Bob Yates University of Central Missouri On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Scott Woods <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Dear Group, Is anyone familiar with research on usage errors and methods for reducing them in students' work? What really works for reducing usage errors? What doesn't work? How should we think of usage errors? Do error reduction efforts work? What do they give us? While I don't want my students to make errors, I'm much more interested in improving their writing than in reducing their errors. Thanks, Scott Woods To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF6436776620BY2PRD0411MB415_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    What the Lansford/Connors study deomstrates is that there was a great deal of uncertainty in the 1980's about appropriate ways to respond to writing. In the 1960's, it was simply understood that English teachers were supposed to "correct" student papers, so much so that "correcting papers" was the usual term for it. In the 1970's, I was trained to "respond" to student writing "in process," and the professional consensus, however limited its reach might have been, is that it is not necessary and probably not useful to correct all the "errors" in a paper. Error could be dealt with in the context of higher order concerns. There was also a sense that individual students would find their own path toward correctness. that they would "acquire" a standard English while attention was on other things. The discovery that teachers varied enormously in what errors they attended to didn't surprise me at the time.
    Hillocks' meta-analysis of research (1986) focuses on those interventions that have proven to improve overall writing. They tossed out all studies that did not measure writing improvement through holistic assessment with well trained teachers and threw out studies that did not have control plus treatment groups. They tended to diminish the importance of surface level features.
     Here's an interesting passage from Hillocks about the Elley study (p. 138): "The grammar groups did outperform the no-grammar classes on a test of usage an mechanics. However, the researchers analyzed the items of the test to determine the precise nature of the differences. They found that the differences appeared in items on the use of capitals, commas in lists, the apostrophe, possessives and contractions, commas for appositives, and so forth--all of which appear to be amenable to direct, discreet instruction." This seems to me typical of the general bias in the field at this time away from any kind of systematic instruction in grammar. The evidence seemed to show that this sort of instruction did have effects that most of us would embrace (admittedly, in a grammar test, not in actual writing), but this is dismissed on the untested assumption that these could be addressed within the context of writing. The Elley study is typical in that the treatment group was given instruction in grammar while the control group was given instruction in reading and creative writing. The fact that the grammar group did better on a grammar test but not on actual writing shouldn't lead us to conclude that grammar study doesn't improve writing, particularly iof we think of literacy as something that develops through a wide range of experiences, practice in writing being absolutely essential.
    Hillocks does go on to say that there is no consensus on what level of mechanical performance is "acceptable" and no proven techniques for accomplishing that.
    The Graham and Perrin meta-analysis (2007) pretty much echoes Hillocks in saying that formal grammar, taught in isolation, does not demonstrably improve writing when pre and post tested against control groups. Both studies say that sentence combining does work and there seems evidence that it works best when accompanied by conversation about language.
    As Myhill points out in her essay in "Beyond the Grammar Wars" (locke, 2010), "Perhaps the absence of a cogent rationale for advocating grammar to improve children's writing is because, as yet, therre is no theoretical framework within which to locate the discussion." In other words, you first have to theorize a connection and then test the efficacy of that when put into practice. Myhill does exactly that in the Exeter study. (http://education.exeter.ac.uk/projects.php?id=419). Students and teachers are led to pay explicit attention to language within the context of their language, and the imporvments are statistically significant.
    My position for a long time has been that you cannot teach writing by remediating deficiencies. On the other hand, students can benefit enormously from knowing about the hurdles they are expected to clear and knowing enough about language to meet those challenges, or at least place them within context. The operative question for me has been what knowledge about language can help students negotiate the complex language tasks that matter to them. I try to frame this in terms of constructing competence. To the extent that we treat language as a "behavior" that needs to be "corrected" we will fail, especially when we try to avoid a deeper understanding of the dynamics of language as we do so.

Craig
    
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Robert Yates [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 10:56 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 20 most common usage errors--research? evidence?

Scott,

I think this is probably the most carefully done research on usage errors in American university student writing.


Connors, Robert J., and Andrea A. Lunsford. "Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research." CCC 39.4 (1988): 395-409.

Bob Yates
University of Central Missouri


On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Scott Woods <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Dear Group,
 
Is anyone familiar with research on usage errors and methods for reducing them in students' work? What really works for reducing usage errors? What doesn't work? How should we think of usage errors? Do error reduction efforts work? What do they give us? While I don't want my students to make errors, I'm much more interested in improving their writing than in reducing their errors.
 
Thanks,
 
Scott Woods
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF6436776620BY2PRD0411MB415_-- ========================================================================Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:43:26 -0700 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Comments: RFC822 error: Invalid RFC822 field - "How would you analyze more in the following sentence: =". Rest of header flushed. From: Scott Woods <[log in to unmask]> Subject: grammar question--more...than MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1488538659-1867463004-1346211806=:342" ---1488538659-1867463004-1346211806=:342 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear List,   How would you analyze more in the following sentence:   And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has.    How would you explain its relationship to than?   Thanks, Scott Woods To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ---1488538659-1867463004-1346211806=:342 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear List,
 
How would you analyze more in the following sentence:
 
And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. 
 
How would you explain its relationship to than?
 
Thanks,

Scott Woods
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ ---1488538659-1867463004-1346211806=:342-- ========================================================================Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:18:36 +0000 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: JULIE ZAVESKY <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_000_BCFD77954885F245A41BF6DF104DE61BE8077FAAEXMBX02lgexinte_ --_000_BCFD77954885F245A41BF6DF104DE61BE8077FAAEXMBX02lgexinte_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thinking in terms of how that sentence would be diagrammed, wouldn't "more . . . than" modify the verb, classifed as adverb or adjective? (this is the first time I am weighing in. Hopefully all will be kind in telling me why I'm wrong.) ________________________________ From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: grammar question--more...than Dear List, How would you analyze more in the following sentence: And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. How would you explain its relationship to than? Thanks, Scott Woods To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_BCFD77954885F245A41BF6DF104DE61BE8077FAAEXMBX02lgexinte_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thinking in terms of how that sentence would be diagrammed, wouldn't "more . . . than" modify the verb, classifed as adverb or adjective?
(this is the first time I am weighing in. Hopefully all will be kind in telling me why I'm wrong.)
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: grammar question--more...than

Dear List,
 
How would you analyze more in the following sentence:
 
And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. 
 
How would you explain its relationship to than?
 
Thanks,

Scott Woods
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_BCFD77954885F245A41BF6DF104DE61BE8077FAAEXMBX02lgexinte_-- ========================================================================Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:08:40 +0000 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: "Hancock, Craig G" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE47CH1PRD0411MB420_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE47CH1PRD0411MB420_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Julie, Welcome to the list. I have offered plenty of wrong explanations over the years and have come to trust the process. I think "more" is a comparative adjective that requires something to compare to. A pared down form of the sentence might be "A man has more nerve control than a woman." He could have "less nerve control than a woman" or "as much nerve control as a woman." Sometimes what you are comparing something to is clear from context; other times, it has to be made explicit. "He always wanted more money" means "more money than he already has." Other adjectives act the same way in requiring complements to complete them. "I am happier than a clam." "Than a clam" is sometimes called an adjective complement. I think it functions adjectivally and does so as a complex construction. Craig From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of JULIE ZAVESKY Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:19 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than Thinking in terms of how that sentence would be diagrammed, wouldn't "more . . . than" modify the verb, classifed as adverb or adjective? (this is the first time I am weighing in. Hopefully all will be kind in telling me why I'm wrong.) ________________________________ From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: grammar question--more...than Dear List, How would you analyze more in the following sentence: And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. How would you explain its relationship to than? Thanks, Scott Woods To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE47CH1PRD0411MB420_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Julie,

    Welcome to the list. I have offered plenty of wrong explanations over the years and have come to trust the process.

   I think “more” is a comparative adjective that requires something to compare to. A pared down form of the sentence might be “A man has more nerve control than a woman.” He could have “less nerve control than a woman” or “as much nerve control as a woman.” Sometimes what you are comparing something to is clear from context; other times, it has to be made explicit. “He always wanted more money” means “more money than he already has.”

    Other adjectives act the same way in requiring complements to complete them. “I am happier than a clam.” “Than a clam” is sometimes called an adjective complement.

     I think it functions adjectivally and does so as a complex construction.

 

Craig

 

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of JULIE ZAVESKY
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than

 

Thinking in terms of how that sentence would be diagrammed, wouldn't "more . . . than" modify the verb, classifed as adverb or adjective?

(this is the first time I am weighing in. Hopefully all will be kind in telling me why I'm wrong.)


From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: grammar question--more...than

Dear List,

 

How would you analyze more in the following sentence:

 

And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. 

 

How would you explain its relationship to than?

 

Thanks,


Scott Woods

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE47CH1PRD0411MB420_-- ========================================================================Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:51:56 -0400 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: Dick Veit <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary cf307f37b4b36a6e04c867dcb8 --20cf307f37b4b36a6e04c867dcb8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This discussion leads me to wonder about the parsing of sentences like this: He spent a dollar more than she did. 1. Is "a dollar" the direct object of the verb "spent? 2. Or is "a dollar" a quantifying adverbial modifying "more"? The following supply evidence for the second analysis: He spent little. He spent more than she did. He spent slightly more than she did. He spent a lot more than she did. He spent a dollar more than she did. If so, is "spent" intransitive here, with "a dollar more than she did" an adverbial, or is "spent" transitive, with "more" as its object? And how about Scott's sentence ("...he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has")? Is "more (of) nerve control" the object of "has," with "that ounce" being a quantifying adverbial? Some related sentences: She has more control than he has. She has more. She has a little more than he has. She has an ounce more than he has. Any thoughts? Dick ------------------------------ > > *From:* Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [ > [log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* grammar question--more...than > > Dear List, > > > > How would you analyze *more* in the following sentence: > > > > And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce *more** *of > nerve control than a woman has. > > > > How would you explain its relationship to *than? * > > > > Thanks, > > > Scott Woods > > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --20cf307f37b4b36a6e04c867dcb8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This discussion leads me to wonder about the parsing of sentences like this:

       He spent a dollar more than she did.

1. Is "a dollar" the direct object of the verb "spent?
2. Or is "a dollar" a quantifying adverbial modifying "more"?

The following supply evidence for the second analysis:

     He spent little.
     He spent more than she did.
     He spent slightly more than she did.
     He spent a lot more than she did.
     He spent a dollar more than she did.

If so, is "spent" intransitive here, with "a dollar more than she did" an adverbial, or is "spent" transitive, with "more" as its object?

And how about Scott's sentence ("...he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has")? Is "more (of) nerve control" the object of "has," with "that ounce" being a quantifying adverbial? Some related sentences:

    She has more control than he has.
    She has more.
    She has a little more than he has.
    She has an ounce more than he has.

Any thoughts?

Dick



From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: grammar question--more...than

Dear List,

 

How would you analyze more in the following sentence:

 

And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. 

 

How would you explain its relationship to than?

 

Thanks,


Scott Woods


To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --20cf307f37b4b36a6e04c867dcb8-- ========================================================================Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:40:11 +0000 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: "Hancock, Craig G" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE82CH1PRD0411MB420_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE82CH1PRD0411MB420_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dick, I was wondering some of the same things. These structures are also often elliptical. "He spent more money than Sally spent" can become "he spent more than Sally" with "money" and "spent" as understood. In that sense, "more" could be working somewhat like a fused head. ("I was the first [child of my parents] to go to college." "Of all our problems, this is the worst." "You gave what you needed to last week; this is more." It seems to me clearly that "ounce" and "dollar" are helping to quantify how much more. I would say that "a dollar more than she did" is the direct object, but "more" is acting like a fused head. It can only do so effectively if "money" is understood. If you say "he sleeps more every day," then "more" would be adverbial. Craig From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dick Veit Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:52 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than This discussion leads me to wonder about the parsing of sentences like this: He spent a dollar more than she did. 1. Is "a dollar" the direct object of the verb "spent? 2. Or is "a dollar" a quantifying adverbial modifying "more"? The following supply evidence for the second analysis: He spent little. He spent more than she did. He spent slightly more than she did. He spent a lot more than she did. He spent a dollar more than she did. If so, is "spent" intransitive here, with "a dollar more than she did" an adverbial, or is "spent" transitive, with "more" as its object? And how about Scott's sentence ("...he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has")? Is "more (of) nerve control" the object of "has," with "that ounce" being a quantifying adverbial? Some related sentences: She has more control than he has. She has more. She has a little more than he has. She has an ounce more than he has. Any thoughts? Dick ________________________________ From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: grammar question--more...than Dear List, How would you analyze more in the following sentence: And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. How would you explain its relationship to than? Thanks, Scott Woods To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE82CH1PRD0411MB420_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dick,

    I was wondering some of the same things.

   These structures are also often elliptical. “He spent more money than Sally spent” can become “he spent more than Sally” with “money” and “spent” as understood. In that sense, “more” could be working  somewhat like a fused head. (“I was the first [child of my parents] to go to college.”  “Of all our problems, this is the worst.”  “You gave what you needed to last week; this is more.”

    It seems to me clearly that “ounce” and “dollar” are helping to quantify how much more.  I would say that “a dollar more than she did” is the direct object, but “more” is acting like a fused head. It can only do so effectively if “money” is understood.

    If you say “he sleeps more every day,” then “more” would be adverbial.

 

Craig

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dick Veit
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than

 

This discussion leads me to wonder about the parsing of sentences like this:

       He spent a dollar more than she did.

1. Is "a dollar" the direct object of the verb "spent?
2. Or is "a dollar" a quantifying adverbial modifying "more"?

The following supply evidence for the second analysis:

     He spent little.
     He spent more than she did.
     He spent slightly more than she did.
     He spent a lot more than she did.
     He spent a dollar more than she did.

If so, is "spent" intransitive here, with "a dollar more than she did" an adverbial, or is "spent" transitive, with "more" as its object?

And how about Scott's sentence ("...he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has")? Is "more (of) nerve control" the object of "has," with "that ounce" being a quantifying adverbial? Some related sentences:

    She has more control than he has.
    She has more.
    She has a little more than he has.
    She has an ounce more than he has.

Any thoughts?

Dick

 


From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Scott Woods [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: grammar question--more...than

Dear List,

 

How would you analyze more in the following sentence:

 

And while a man may feel like [screaming], he has that ounce more of nerve control than a woman has. 

 

How would you explain its relationship to than?

 

Thanks,


Scott Woods

 

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ --_000_D20F2B3DEFA4B943834522CB0F31DF643677AE82CH1PRD0411MB420_-- ========================================================================Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:41:13 -0700 Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> From: Bruce Despain <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: grammar question--more...than MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PERJViBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6VmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsgZm9udC1zaXplOjEw cHQ7Ij48RElWPlRoZXJlIGlzIGEgZGVzY3JpcHRpb24gb2YgdGhlIHF1YW50aWZpZXIgY29uc3Ry dWN0aW9uIGluIG15IEFuYWx5dGljYWwgU3ludGF4IG9mIEVuZ2xpc2guJm5ic3A7IFRoZXJlIGFy ZSBzZXZlcmFsIGtpbmRzIG9mIHF1YW50aWZpZXIuJm5ic3A7IFRoZSBjb25zdHJ1Y3Rpb24gaW4g cXVlc3Rpb24gaXMgZGVzY3JpYmVkIGFzIGEgbm9taW5hbGl6YXRpb24gb2YgPFNUUk9ORz48RU0+ bW9yZTwvRU0+PC9TVFJPTkc+IHRoZSBjb21wYXJhdGl2ZSBvZiA8U1RST05HPjxFTT5tdWNoPC9F TT48L1NUUk9ORz4gKG9yIDxFTT48U1RST05HPm1hbnk8L1NUUk9ORz48L0VNPikuJm5ic3A7IFRo ZSBwcmVzZW5jZSBvZiA8U1RST05HPjxFTT5vZjwvRU0+PC9TVFJPTkc+IGlzIG9wdGlvbmFsIGlu IHRoaXMgY2FzZSBpbiB0aGUgc2Vuc2UgdGhhdCB0aGUgaW50ZXJwcmV0YXRpb24gcmVtYWlucyB0 aGUgc2FtZSwgd2hldGhlciB0aGUgYWRqZWN0aXZlIGlzIHVzZWQgYXMgYSBwcm9ub3VuIG9yIG5v dC4mbmJzcDsgPC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxBIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cuYmRlc3BhaW4ub3JnL1Mm TC9TRS9TRS0xNTkuaHRtIj53d3cuYmRlc3BhaW4ub3JnL1MmYW1wO0wvU0UvU0UtMTU5Lmh0bTwv QT48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPkJydWNlPC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxCUj4t LS0gY2hhbmNvY2tAQUxCQU5ZLkVEVSB3cm90ZTo8QlI+PEJSPkZyb206ICJIYW5jb2NrLCBDcmFp ZyBHIiAmbHQ7Y2hhbmNvY2tAQUxCQU5ZLkVEVSZndDs8QlI+VG86IEFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVP SElPLkVEVTxCUj5TdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogZ3JhbW1hciBxdWVzdGlvbi0tbW9yZS4uLnRoYW48QlI+ RGF0ZTogV2VkLCAyOSBBdWcgMjAxMiAxNTo0MDoxMSArMDAwMDxCUj48QlI+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElW Pg0KPFA+PFNQQU4gc3R5bGU9IkZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiAnQ2FsaWJyaScsJ3NhbnMtc2VyaWYnOyBD T0xPUjogIzFmNDk3ZDsgRk9OVC1TSVpFOiAxMXB0Ij5EaWNrLDwvU1BBTj48L1A+PC9ESVY+DQo8 UD48U1BBTiBzdHlsZT0iRk9OVC1GQU1JTFk6ICdDYWxpYnJpJywnc2Fucy1zZXJpZic7IENPTE9S OiAjMWY0OTdkOyBGT05ULVNJWkU6IDExcHQiPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBJIHdhcyB3b25k ZXJpbmcgc29tZSBvZiB0aGUgc2FtZSB0aGluZ3MuPC9TUEFOPjwvUD48L0RJVj4NCjxQPjxTUEFO IHN0eWxlPSJGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogJ0NhbGlicmknLCdzYW5zLXNlcmlmJzsgQ09MT1I6ICMxZjQ5 N2Q7IEZPTlQtU0laRTogMTFwdCI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IFRoZXNlIHN0cnVjdHVyZXMgYXJlIGFs c28gb2Z0ZW4gZWxsaXB0aWNhbC4g4oCcSGUgc3BlbnQgbW9yZSBtb25leSB0aGFuIFNhbGx5IHNw ZW504oCdIGNhbiBiZWNvbWUg4oCcaGUgc3BlbnQgbW9yZSB0aGFuIFNhbGx54oCdIHdpdGgg4oCc bW9uZXnigJ0gYW5kIOKAnHNwZW504oCdIGFzIHVuZGVyc3Rvb2QuIEluIHRoYXQgc2Vuc2UsIOKA nG1vcmXigJ0gY291bGQgYmUgd29ya2luZyAmbmJzcDtzb21ld2hhdCBsaWtlIGEgZnVzZWQgaGVh ZC4gKOKAnEkgd2FzIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBbY2hpbGQgb2YgbXkgcGFyZW50c10gdG8gZ28gdG8gY29s bGVnZS7igJ0mbmJzcDsg4oCcT2YgYWxsIG91ciBwcm9ibGVtcywgdGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgd29yc3Qu 4oCdICZuYnNwO+KAnFlvdSBnYXZlIHdoYXQgeW91IG5lZWRlZCB0byBsYXN0IHdlZWs7IHRoaXMg aXMgbW9yZS7igJ0gPC9TUEFOPg0KPC9QPjxQPjxTUEFOIHN0eWxlPSJGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogJ0Nh bGlicmknLCdzYW5zLXNlcmlmJzsgQ09MT1I6ICMxZjQ5N2Q7IEZPTlQtU0laRTogMTFwdCI+Jm5i c3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7SXQgc2VlbXMgdG8gbWUgY2xlYXJseSB0aGF0IOKAnG91bmNl 4oCdIGFuZCDigJxkb2xsYXLigJ0gYXJlIGhlbHBpbmcgdG8gcXVhbnRpZnkgaG93IG11Y2ggbW9y ZS4gJm5ic3A7SSB3b3VsZCBzYXkgdGhhdCDigJxhIGRvbGxhciBtb3JlIHRoYW4gc2hlIGRpZOKA nSBpcyB0aGUgZGlyZWN0IG9iamVjdCwgYnV0IOKAnG1vcmXigJ0gaXMgYWN0aW5nIGxpa2UgYSBm dXNlZCBoZWFkLiBJdCBjYW4gb25seSBkbyBzbyBlZmZlY3RpdmVseSBpZiDigJxtb25leeKAnSBp cyB1bmRlcnN0b29kLiA8L1NQQU4+DQo8L1A+PFA+PFNQQU4gc3R5bGU9IkZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiAn Q2FsaWJyaScsJ3NhbnMtc2VyaWYnOyBDT0xPUjogIzFmNDk3ZDsgRk9OVC1TSVpFOiAxMXB0Ij4m bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDtJZiB5b3Ugc2F5IOKAnGhlIHNsZWVwcyBtb3JlIGV2ZXJ5 IGRheSzigJ0gdGhlbiDigJxtb3Jl4oCdIHdvdWxkIGJlIGFkdmVyYmlhbC4gPC9TUEFOPg0KPC9Q PjxQPjxTUEFOIHN0eWxlPSJGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogJ0NhbGlicmknLCdzYW5zLXNlcmlmJzsgQ09M T1I6ICMxZjQ5N2Q7IEZPTlQtU0laRTogMTFwdCI+PC9TUEFOPiZuYnNwOw0KPC9QPjxQPjxTUEFO IHN0eWxlPSJGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogJ0NhbGlicmknLCdzYW5zLXNlcmlmJzsgQ09MT1I6ICMxZjQ5 N2Q7IEZPTlQtU0laRTogMTFwdCI+Q3JhaWc8L1NQQU4+DQo8L1A+PFA+PEI+PFNQQU4gc3R5bGU9 IkZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiAnVGFob21hJywnc2Fucy1zZXJpZic7IEZPTlQtU0laRTogMTBwdCI+RnJv bTo8L1NQQU4+PC9CPjxTUEFOIHN0eWxlPSJGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogJ1RhaG9tYScsJ3NhbnMtc2Vy aWYnOyBGT05ULVNJWkU6IDEwcHQiPiBBc3NlbWJseSBmb3IgdGhlIFRlYWNoaW5nIG9mIEVuZ2xp c2ggR3JhbW1hciBbbWFpbHRvOkFURUdATElTVFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVV0gPEI+T24gQmVoYWxm IE9mIDwvQj5EaWNrIFZlaXQ8QlI+PEI+U2VudDo8L0I+IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgQXVndXN0IDI5LCAy MDEyIDk6NTIgQU08QlI+PEI+VG86PC9CPiBBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFU8QlI+PEI+ U3ViamVjdDo8L0I+IFJlOiBncmFtbWFyIHF1ZXN0aW9uLS1tb3JlLi4udGhhbjwvU1BBTj4NCjwv UD48UD4mbmJzcDsNCjxESVY+PC9ESVY+DQo8L1A+PFAgc3R5bGU9Ik1BUkdJTi1CT1RUT006IDEy cHQiPlRoaXMgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBsZWFkcyBtZSB0byB3b25kZXIgYWJvdXQgdGhlIHBhcnNpbmcg b2Ygc2VudGVuY2VzIGxpa2UgdGhpczo8QlI+PEJSPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyBIZSBzcGVudCBhIGRvbGxhciBtb3JlIHRoYW4gc2hlIGRpZC48QlI+PEJSPjEu IElzICJhIGRvbGxhciIgdGhlIGRpcmVjdCBvYmplY3Qgb2YgdGhlIHZlcmIgInNwZW50PzxCUj4y LiBPciBpcyAiYSBkb2xsYXIiIGEgcXVhbnRpZnlpbmcgYWR2ZXJiaWFsIG1vZGlmeWluZyAibW9y ZSI/PEJSPjxCUj5UaGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIHN1cHBseSBldmlkZW5jZSBmb3IgdGhlIHNlY29uZCBh bmFseXNpczo8QlI+PEJSPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBIZSBzcGVudCBsaXR0bGUu PEJSPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBIZSBzcGVudCBtb3JlIHRoYW4gc2hlIGRpZC48 QlI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IEhlIHNwZW50IHNsaWdodGx5IG1vcmUgdGhhbiBz aGUgZGlkLjxCUj4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgSGUgc3BlbnQgYSBsb3QgbW9yZSB0 aGFuIHNoZSBkaWQuPEJSPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBIZSBzcGVudCBhIGRvbGxh ciBtb3JlIHRoYW4gc2hlIGRpZC48QlI+PEJSPklmIHNvLCBpcyAic3BlbnQiIGludHJhbnNpdGl2 ZSBoZXJlLCB3aXRoICJhIGRvbGxhciBtb3JlIHRoYW4gc2hlIGRpZCIgYW4gYWR2ZXJiaWFsLCBv ciBpcyAic3BlbnQiIHRyYW5zaXRpdmUsIHdpdGggIm1vcmUiIGFzIGl0cyBvYmplY3Q/PEJSPjxC Uj5BbmQgaG93IGFib3V0IFNjb3R0J3Mgc2VudGVuY2UgKCIuLi5oZSBoYXMgdGhhdCBvdW5jZSBt b3JlIG9mIG5lcnZlIGNvbnRyb2wgdGhhbiBhIHdvbWFuIGhhcyIpPyBJcyAibW9yZSAob2YpIG5l cnZlIGNvbnRyb2wiIHRoZSBvYmplY3Qgb2YgImhhcywiIHdpdGggInRoYXQgb3VuY2UiIGJlaW5n IGEgcXVhbnRpZnlpbmcgYWR2ZXJiaWFsPyBTb21lIHJlbGF0ZWQgc2VudGVuY2VzOjxCUj48QlI+ Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7IFNoZSBoYXMgbW9yZSBjb250cm9sIHRoYW4gaGUgaGFzLjxCUj4m bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgU2hlIGhhcyBtb3JlLjxCUj4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgU2hl IGhhcyBhIGxpdHRsZSBtb3JlIHRoYW4gaGUgaGFzLjxCUj4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgU2hl IGhhcyBhbiBvdW5jZSBtb3JlIHRoYW4gaGUgaGFzLjxCUj48QlI+QW55IHRob3VnaHRzPzxCUj48 QlI+RGljaw0KPERJVj48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+DQo8QkxPQ0tRVU9URSBzdHlsZT0iQk9SREVSLUJP VFRPTTogbWVkaXVtIG5vbmU7IEJPUkRFUi1MRUZUOiAjY2NjY2NjIDFwdCBzb2xpZDsgUEFERElO Ry1CT1RUT006IDBpbjsgUEFERElORy1MRUZUOiA2cHQ7IFBBRERJTkctUklHSFQ6IDBpbjsgTUFS R0lOLUxFRlQ6IDQuOHB0OyBCT1JERVItVE9QOiBtZWRpdW0gbm9uZTsgTUFSR0lOLVJJR0hUOiAw aW47IEJPUkRFUi1SSUdIVDogbWVkaXVtIG5vbmU7IFBBRERJTkctVE9QOiAwaW4iPg0KPC9CTE9D S1FVT1RFPjwvRElWPjwvUD48UD4mbmJzcDsNCjxESVY+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPERJVj4NCjxE SVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPERJVj4NCjxESVY+DQo8RElWIHN0eWxlPSJURVhULUFMSUdOOiBjZW50ZXIi IGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiPjxTUEFOIHN0eWxlPSJGT05ULUZBTUlMWTogJ1RhaG9tYScsJ3NhbnMt c2VyaWYnOyBGT05ULVNJWkU6IDEwcHQiPg0KPEhSIGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiIHNpemU9IjIiIHdp ZHRoPSIxMDAlIj4NCjwvU1BBTj48L0RJVj48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPC9ESVY+PC9E SVY+PC9ESVY+PC9ESVY+PC9ESVY+PC9ESVY+PC9ESVY+PC9QPjxQIHN0eWxlPSJNQVJHSU4tQk9U VE9NOiAxMnB0OyBtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6IGF1dG8iPjxCPjxTUEFOIHN0eWxlPSJGT05U LUZBTUlMWTogJ1RhaG9tYScsJ3NhbnMtc2VyaWYnOyBGT05ULVNJWkU6IDEwcHQiPkZyb206PC9T UEFOPjwvQj48U1BBTiBzdHlsZT0iRk9OVC1GQU1JTFk6ICdUYWhvbWEnLCdzYW5zLXNlcmlmJzsg Rk9OVC1TSVpFOiAxMHB0Ij4gQXNzZW1ibHkgZm9yIHRoZSBUZWFjaGluZyBvZiBFbmdsaXNoIEdy YW1tYXIgWzxBIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFUiPkFURUdATElT VFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVTwvQT5dIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBTY290dCBXb29kcyBbPEEgaHJlZj0i bWFpbHRvOnNjb3R0d3dvb2RzQFlBSE9PLkNPTSI+c2NvdHR3d29vZHNAWUFIT08uQ09NPC9BPl08 QlI+PEI+U2VudDo8L0I+IFR1ZXNkYXksIEF1Z3VzdCAyOCwgMjAxMiAxMTo0MyBQTTxCUj48Qj5U bzo8L0I+IDxBIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpBVEVHQExJU1RTRVJWLk1VT0hJTy5FRFUiPkFURUdATElT VFNFUlYuTVVPSElPLkVEVTwvQT48QlI+PEI+U3ViamVjdDo8L0I+IGdyYW1tYXIgcXVlc3Rpb24t LW1vcmUuLi50aGFuPC9TUEFOPg0KPERJVj48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPERJVj4NCjwv RElWPjwvRElWPjwvRElWPjwvUD48UCBzdHlsZT0iQkFDS0dST1VORDogd2hpdGU7IG1zby1tYXJn aW4tdG9wLWFsdDogYXV0bzsgbXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OiBhdXRvIj5EZWFyIExpc3Qs DQo8RElWPjwvRElWPg0KPERJVj4NCjwvRElWPjwvUD48UCBzdHlsZT0iQkFDS0dST1VORDogd2hp dGU7IG1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDogYXV0bzsgbXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OiBhdXRv Ij4mbmJzcDsNCjxESVY+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPC9ESVY+PC9QPjxQIHN0eWxlPSJCQUNLR1JP VU5EOiB3aGl0ZTsgbXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OiBhdXRvOyBtc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1h bHQ6IGF1dG8iPkhvdyB3b3VsZCB5b3UgYW5hbHl6ZSA8ST5tb3JlPC9JPiBpbiB0aGUgZm9sbG93 aW5nIHNlbnRlbmNlOiANCjxESVY+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPC9ESVY+PC9QPjxQIHN0eWxlPSJC QUNLR1JPVU5EOiB3aGl0ZTsgbXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OiBhdXRvOyBtc28tbWFyZ2luLWJv dHRvbS1hbHQ6IGF1dG8iPiZuYnNwOw0KPERJVj48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+DQo8L0RJVj48L1A+PFAg c3R5bGU9IkJBQ0tHUk9VTkQ6IHdoaXRlOyBtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6IGF1dG87IG1zby1t YXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDogYXV0byI+QW5kIHdoaWxlIGEgbWFuIG1heSBmZWVsIGxpa2UgW3Nj cmVhbWluZ10sIGhlIGhhcyB0aGF0IG91bmNlIDxCPjxJPm1vcmU8L0k+IDwvQj5vZiBuZXJ2ZSBj b250cm9sIHRoYW4gYSB3b21hbiBoYXMuJm5ic3A7IA0KPERJVj48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+DQo8L0RJ Vj48L1A+PFAgc3R5bGU9IkJBQ0tHUk9VTkQ6IHdoaXRlOyBtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6IGF1 dG87IG1zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDogYXV0byI+Jm5ic3A7DQo8RElWPjwvRElWPg0KPERJ Vj4NCjwvRElWPjwvUD48UCBzdHlsZT0iQkFDS0dST1VORDogd2hpdGU7IG1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9w LWFsdDogYXV0bzsgbXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OiBhdXRvIj5Ib3cgd291bGQgeW91IGV4 cGxhaW4gaXRzIHJlbGF0aW9uc2hpcCB0byA8ST50aGFuPyA8L0k+DQo8RElWPjwvRElWPg0KPERJ Vj4NCjwvRElWPjwvUD48UCBzdHlsZT0iQkFDS0dST1VORDogd2hpdGU7IG1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9w LWFsdDogYXV0bzsgbXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OiBhdXRvIj4mbmJzcDsNCjxESVY+PC9E SVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPC9ESVY+PC9QPjxQIHN0eWxlPSJCQUNLR1JPVU5EOiB3aGl0ZTsgbXNvLW1h cmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OiBhdXRvOyBtc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6IGF1dG8iPlRoYW5rcywN CjxESVY+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPg0KPC9ESVY+PC9QPjxQIHN0eWxlPSJCQUNLR1JPVU5EOiB3aGl0 ZTsgbXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3AtYWx0OiBhdXRvOyBtc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6IGF1dG8i PjxCUj5TY290dCBXb29kcw0KPERJVj48L0RJVj4NCjwvUD48UD4mbmJzcDsNCjxESVY+PC9ESVY+ DQo8L1A+PFA+VG8gam9pbiBvciBsZWF2ZSB0aGlzIExJU1RTRVJWIGxpc3QsIHBsZWFzZSB2aXNp dCB0aGUgbGlzdCdzIHdlYiBpbnRlcmZhY2UgYXQ6IDxBIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly9saXN0c2Vydi5t dW9oaW8uZWR1L2FyY2hpdmVzL2F0ZWcuaHRtbCI+aHR0cDovL2xpc3RzZXJ2Lm11b2hpby5lZHUv YXJjaGl2ZXMvYXRlZy5odG1sPC9BPiBhbmQgc2VsZWN0ICJKb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoZSBsaXN0 IiANCjxESVY+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPlZpc2l0IEFURUcncyB3ZWIgc2l0ZSBhdCA8QSBocmVmPSJo dHRwOi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvIj5odHRwOi8vYXRlZy5vcmcvPC9BPiA8L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+PC9ESVY+ VG8gam9pbiBvciBsZWF2ZSB0aGlzIExJU1RTRVJWIGxpc3QsIHBsZWFzZSB2aXNpdCB0aGUgbGlz dCdzIHdlYiBpbnRlcmZhY2UgYXQ6IGh0dHA6Ly9saXN0c2Vydi5tdW9oaW8uZWR1L2FyY2hpdmVz L2F0ZWcuaHRtbCBhbmQgc2VsZWN0ICJKb2luIG9yIGxlYXZlIHRoZSBsaXN0IiANCjxESVY+Vmlz aXQgQVRFRydzIHdlYiBzaXRlIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly9hdGVnLm9yZy8gPC9ESVY+PC9QPg=