Scott,
I think there is pretty good evidence that putting students in classes that mainly focus on “remediation” is not effective. You might want to check out
the ALP (Accelerated Learning Program) for some description of an alternative to that at the college level. Alp-deved.org. They have a delightful annual conference scheduled for June.
I would also check out the Exeter research program (mostly Debra Myhill) at
http://education.exeter.ac.uk./projects.php?id=419. They look directly at ways in which a focus on language improves writing and have definitely demonstrated that it does.
I would also deeply recommend
Language Education throughout the School Years: A Functional Perspective by Francis Christie for a description of the programming going on down in Australia. (2012, Wiley-Blackwell. Mary Schleppegrell, from the University of Michigan, is the series
editor and has a forward.)
My own rule of thumb is that you can’t teach writing by remediating deficiencies. You do it by constructing competence, and that includes competence in
the use of the resources of language for the production of effective text.
Craig
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Scott Woods
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Writing well v. reducing errors
Dear List,
What research is available to support an approach to teaching grammar and writing that focuses on helping students write well, rather than focusing on reducing errors? Is there any evidence that error reduction efforts improve writing or even reduce errors?
Thanks,
Scott Woods
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/