ATEG Archives

March 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Hide Table of Contents

"She about to turn..." (3 Messages)
a punctuation question (7 Messages)
ATEG Digest - 11 Mar 2008 to 12 Mar 2008 (#2008-63) (1 Message)
ATEG Digest - 14 Mar 2008 to 15 Mar 2008 (#2008-66) (1 Message)
ATEG Digest - 21 Mar 2008 to 22 Mar 2008 (#2008-73) (1 Message)
ATEG Digest - 24 Mar 2008 to 25 Mar 2008 (#2008-76) (1 Message)
ATEG Digest - 29 Feb 2008 to 1 Mar 2008 (#2008-54) (1 Message)
Because of vs. due to (6 Messages)
BOOK REVIEW NEEDED (3 Messages)
Civility (1 Message)
Composition Conference in Greeley, Colorado (1 Message)
Defining passive voice (1 Message)
Does English have a future tense? (5 Messages)
Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77) (2 Messages)
due to (4 Messages)
Expletives (9 Messages)
Expletives redundancy (1 Message)
Felicity has been earning lots (1 Message)
For fellow sentence diagrammers (1 Message)
gerund vs infinitive (13 Messages)
Grammar Quiz responses - continued (4 Messages)
Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama (1 Message)
Herb's preference for context (1 Message)
interpretation of a relative clause (4 Messages)
Jane Mairs - out of the office (1 Message)
Once and Future English Tense (8 Messages)
Passive (1 Message)
past perfect--a final note (18 Messages)
Problems with communication (2 Messages)
Redundancy (1 Message)
Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation (1 Message)
Subjunctive (16 Messages)
Subjunctive thoughts (2 Messages)
Subjunctive(?): not critical that (1 Message)
Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64) (3 Messages)
That/Which Rule post from WPA (8 Messages)
Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule? (3 Messages)

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date
New Thread "She about to turn..."
Re: "She about to turn..."
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:31:33 -0400
Re: "She about to turn..."
Don Stewart
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:28:23 -0400
"She about to turn..."
Roberto Perez
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:08:21 -0500
New Thread a punctuation question
Re: a punctuation question
Veit, Richard
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:25:34 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Patrice D. Williams, Ph.D
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:48 -0500
Re: a punctuation question
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:09:12 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Spruiell, William C
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:14:27 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Nancy Tuten
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:36:45 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Geoffrey Layton
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:59:43 -0500
a punctuation question
Veit, Richard
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:48:02 -0400
New Thread ATEG Digest - 11 Mar 2008 to 12 Mar 2008 (#2008-63)
Re: ATEG Digest - 11 Mar 2008 to 12 Mar 2008 (#2008-63)
Scott
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:53:03 -0400
New Thread ATEG Digest - 14 Mar 2008 to 15 Mar 2008 (#2008-66)
Re: ATEG Digest - 14 Mar 2008 to 15 Mar 2008 (#2008-66)
Scott
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:25:53 -0400
New Thread ATEG Digest - 21 Mar 2008 to 22 Mar 2008 (#2008-73)
Re: ATEG Digest - 21 Mar 2008 to 22 Mar 2008 (#2008-73)
Scott
Sun, 23 Mar 2008 07:42:30 -0400
New Thread ATEG Digest - 24 Mar 2008 to 25 Mar 2008 (#2008-76)
Re: ATEG Digest - 24 Mar 2008 to 25 Mar 2008 (#2008-76)
Scott
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:25:53 -0400
New Thread ATEG Digest - 29 Feb 2008 to 1 Mar 2008 (#2008-54)
Re: ATEG Digest - 29 Feb 2008 to 1 Mar 2008 (#2008-54)
Scott
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:51:03 -0500
New Thread Because of vs. due to
Re: Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:58:32 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
Atchley, Clinton
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:55:17 -0500
Re: Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:33:30 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:52:02 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
Atchley, Clinton
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:41:09 -0500
Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:08:03 -0400
New Thread BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
rbetting
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:35:21 -0600
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
Myers, Marshall
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:38:22 -0500
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
Myers, Marshall
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:07:54 -0500
New Thread Civility
Civility
Paul E. Doniger
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:41:01 -0800
New Thread Composition Conference in Greeley, Colorado
Composition Conference in Greeley, Colorado
Ben Varner
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 08:19:52 -0700
New Thread Defining passive voice
Defining passive voice
Kimberley Hunt
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:43:10 -0600
New Thread Does English have a future tense?
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:15:34 -0400
Re: Does English have a future tense?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:54:39 -0400
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Carol Morrison
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:05:32 -0700
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Geoffrey Layton
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:34:18 -0500
Does English have a future tense?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:31:13 -0400
New Thread Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77)
Re: Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:57:36 -0400
Re: Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77)
Scott
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:03:02 -0400
New Thread due to
Re: due to
Craig Hancock
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:55:27 -0400
Re: due to
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:23:20 -0400
Re: due to
Craig Hancock
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:24:13 -0400
Re: due to
Edmond Wright
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:48:31 +0000
New Thread Expletives
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:02:12 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:26:25 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:15:34 -0400
Re: Expletives
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:11:32 -0400
Re: Expletives
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:01:46 -0400
Re: Expletives
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:01:02 -0400
Re: Expletives
Craig Hancock
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:07:30 -0400
Re: Expletives
Robert Troyer
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:56:05 -0700
Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:09:47 -0400
New Thread Expletives redundancy
Expletives redundancy
DD Farms
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:02:34 -0500
New Thread Felicity has been earning lots
Felicity has been earning lots
Brad Johnston
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:10:36 -0700
New Thread For fellow sentence diagrammers
For fellow sentence diagrammers
Michael Kischner
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:56:38 -0700
New Thread gerund vs infinitive
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:24:12 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:46:55 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:42:30 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:40:28 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:34:13 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Bruce Despain
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:11:33 -0600
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Linda Di Desidero
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:03:24 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Craig Hancock
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:26:28 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:43:42 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:22:06 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:35:02 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:12:41 -0400
gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:44:21 -0400
New Thread Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Gretchen Le
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 15:33:32 -0800
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Phil Bralich
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:17:59 -1000
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
DD Farms
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:36:20 -0600
Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Brad Johnston
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:16:20 -0800
New Thread Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama
Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama
Carole Hurlbut
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:56:17 -0600
New Thread Herb's preference for context
Herb's preference for context
Brad Johnston
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:56:54 -0700
New Thread interpretation of a relative clause
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Kathleen M. Ward
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:58:03 -0700
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:52:16 -0400
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Edmond Wright
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:47:16 +0000
interpretation of a relative clause
R. Michael Medley (GLS)
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:37:45 -0400
New Thread Jane Mairs - out of the office
Jane Mairs - out of the office
Jane Mairs
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:30:42 -0400
New Thread Once and Future English Tense
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:43:52 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Veit, Richard
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:16:13 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:35:50 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Veit, Richard
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:35:41 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Geoffrey Layton
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:37:44 -0500
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:05:27 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Geoffrey Layton
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:48:46 -0500
Once and Future English Tense
DD Farms
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:49:43 -0500
New Thread Passive
Passive
Linda Comerford
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:51:31 -0400
New Thread past perfect--a final note
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:03 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:06:16 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:54:24 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Martha Kolln
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:16:33 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Di Desidero
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:38:41 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Craig Hancock
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:42:41 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Nancy Tuten
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:20:16 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Edgar Schuster
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:38:50 EST
Re: past perfect--a final note
Karl Hagen
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:42:09 -0800
Re: past perfect--a final note
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:33:19 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Martha Kolln
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:35:22 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Peter Adams
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:15:48 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:04:01 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Edgar Schuster
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:05:28 EST
Re: past perfect--a final note
Craig Hancock
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:06:32 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
helene hoover
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:45:48 +0000
Re: past perfect--a final note
Brad Johnston
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:17:14 -0800
past perfect--a final note
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:07:57 -0500
New Thread Problems with communication
Re: Problems with communication
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:56:50 -0500
Problems with communication
Bruce D. Despain
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 05:36:30 -0700
New Thread Redundancy
Re: Redundancy
Edmond Wright
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:56:53 +0000
New Thread Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation
Craig Hancock
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 15:12:04 -0500
New Thread Subjunctive
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:19:12 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:58:53 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:06:07 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:31:48 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Susan van Druten
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:53:18 -0500
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:57:25 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:44:56 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:14:06 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:17:55 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Wollin, Edith
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:24:49 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:22:30 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:25:17 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Linda Di Desidero
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:36:08 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
DD Farms
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:06:25 -0500
Re: Subjunctive
Kathleen M. Ward
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:47:19 -0700
Subjunctive
DD Farms
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:55 -0500
New Thread Subjunctive thoughts
Re: Subjunctive thoughts
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:07:11 -0400
Re: Subjunctive thoughts
DD Farms
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:39 -0500
New Thread Subjunctive(?): not critical that
FW: Subjunctive(?): not critical that
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:24:38 -0400
New Thread Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
Re: Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:08:28 -0400
Re: Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
Spruiell, William C
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:49:42 -0400
Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
Scott
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:38:11 -0400
New Thread That/Which Rule post from WPA
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:38:19 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:39:58 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:17:21 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:48:49 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Martha Kolln
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:31:32 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:47:14 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Carol Morrison
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:19:01 -0700
That/Which Rule post from WPA
Linda Di Desidero
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:42:14 -0400
New Thread Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
Re: Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
DD Farms
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:37:28 -0500
Re: Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
Karl Hagen
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:42:00 -0700
Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:59:01 -0400

ATOM RSS1 RSS2