Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 11 Aug 1995 11:28:52 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
>Sender: Alcohol and Temperance History Group <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster: Maria Swora <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: washingtonianism
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maria. I just returned from vacation and found a brief discussion of
Washingtonianism on my email. As to your interest in post-bellum groups of
a similar sort. Yes, there were many. I have referred to them as
neo-Washingtonian organizations. They represent a tradition that remained
very much alive in evangelical circles in particular. See: Jim Baumohl,
"Inebriate Institutions in North America, 1840-1920." In Cheryl Warsh, ed.,
Drink In Canada (mcGill-Queens, 1993). Also, Jim Baumohl, "On Asylums,
Homes, and Moral Treatment: The Case of the San Francisco Home for the Care
of Inebriates, 1859-1870." Contemporary Drug Problems, 13 (1986), 395-446.
jim baumohl
>Hello all,
>
>All this talk about the Washingtonians has reminded me of a question that
>came up in my thesis defense. Were there postbellum voluntary associations
>similar to the Washingtonians and other temperance associations?
>
>My MA is in anthropology, and the thesis concerned AA. The Washingtonians
>provided a point of comparison.
>
>Maria Swora
>Dept Anthropology
>University of Rochester
>
>
|
|
|