ADHS Archives

May 1997

ADHS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Andersen, Thayne I." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alcohol and Temperance History Group <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 May 1997 12:10:51 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (20 lines)
I guess that we can get picky about what the 18th amendment did or did not
do.  Prohibition, as I understand it, really prohibited very little.
 
It was the manufacture and sale of ETHEL alcohol that it was supposed to
prohibit (there are two other types of alcohol).  But personal
consumption, although the target, was not prohibited (except in some
states and territories).  In Alaska, for example, the "Bone Dry" law
patterned after Idaho's prohibition law actually prohibited personal
possession and consumption, but even there, there were loopholes - for
example for medical (for the "diagnosis" for drought, for example for
whites) and religious purposes, experimental and mechanical applications
also were legal.
 
As I understand it, it did exactly what the politicians wanted it to do -
give the appearance of prohibition without actually doing it.
 
Thayne
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
     An unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2