ADHS Archives

December 2007

ADHS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gus Seligmann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alcohol and Drugs History Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:39:17 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
     Colleagues,

           This corresponds with my recollections of my research in New Mexico liquor law.  For those interested my slightly less than seminal article in the New Mexico Hist. Review of several years ago is entitled "Alamogordo and Alcohol:  Social Control or Monopoly?"  To say the least the publication of this article did not cause historical Cabinets to fall or the profession to march off in a different direction.

           Gus Seligmann
           Univ of North Texas



>>> Jon Miller <[log in to unmask]> 12/3/2007 8:55 AM >>>
My reading of nineteenth-century American literature and periodicals 
has taught me two things. If there was a law, it could be widely 
ignored. America was not much of a police state, especially before the 
Civil War, and the decision to serve minors or not serve minors would 
be something that the tavernkeeper would often make under no or some or 
great scrutiny from his immediate community (and constituency and/or 
customer base).

It also appears to me that children were often sent to fetch alcoholic 
drinks for their parents. A child who makes regular runs to a bar-room 
or pharmacy to purchase something for his parents would have no trouble 
purchasing the same for his own use. There's no doubt, for me, that 
some lazy parents would resist the enforcement of a minimum purchase 
age on this count alone: it would mean that they would have to go get 
their own buckets of beer or quarts of Lydia Pinkham.

Jon Miller

ATOM RSS1 RSS2