Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:56:33 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Linda:
I have an answer in two points to your question:
1. If the student knows grammar, can he analyze and explain the
syntactic structure he generated?
2. What if our knowledge of language structure and function is very
rudimentary, and while we can use language we cannot explain its
functions?
And let me make an analogy that I believe applies quite well to our
discussion: You probably have a car, like most of us, and that car is
controlled by a computer. Does the fact that you are a good driver,
mean that you can troubleshoot your car?
Eduard
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Linda Didesidero wrote...
>While I agree with some of what you are saying, Eduard, I believe
that you
>have opened a discussion thread that will be quite interesting to
follow!
>
>
>You wrote: "The idea that the "native speaker knows more grammar
than has
>ever
>been printed in any grammar books" is PURE NONSENSE"
>
>And here's a response based on recent discussions: Informed by
his/her own
>grammar, a student can write a sentence such as "Running from the
neck to the
>cheek is a patch of white hair" and the grammar experts can debate
about the
>grammatical structure of this sentence for days! In this case, the
>student's grammar informs the structure that the grammarians cannot
agree on. Who
>knows more grammar?
>
>I think that is what the statement actually means. I don't think it
has
>anything to do with Chomsky's LAD or wiring or anything.
>
>Looking forward to other responses--
>Linda
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|