Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:10:03 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 07:27 PM 12/7/2008, Craig Hancock wrote:
> > Bill,
> I appreciate your attempt to douse the fire. The case for cognitive
>grammar is available to anyone interested, and I hope there are many
>on the list.
> As you say, generative grammar was never intended to be a pedagogical
>grammar. Other grammars, if they prove to be more accurate descriptions
>of the language, may also have the benefit of giving us a case for
>placing grammar much closer to the center of the English curriculum.. . .
DD: I am sorry, but Ii am not an English grammarian. I am interested
in what this list discusses, but way behind on commonly understood
terms. Is there some source I could buy that explains the various
terms re Generative, Cognitive, and the Others?
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|