Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 1999 14:11:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Could this be a case showing the inadequacies of traditional grammar and
the strengths of generative? If we accept Emily's explanation, we would
have to assume that every compound has an elipsis--or, rather, is formed
through the process of elipsis.
We could instead say that the sentence is generated from two kernels,
something like this:
People are blaming Terry's parents for Terry's actions.
People are not blaming Terry for his actions.
Bill
>I agree completely with Emily.
>
>>>> emily wilson-orzechowski <[log in to unmask]> 10/29 1:10 PM >>>
>Michael,
> I would read the sentence you ask about as "People are blaming
>Terry's parents and (are) not (blaming) Terry for his actions." The
>negative version of the verb is shortened through elipsis and "parents"
>is the object of the positive version, and "Terry" is the object of the
>negative one. "Not" is an adverb with the second verb (implied).
>
>Emily Wilson-Orzechowski
William J. McCleary
3247 Bronson Hill Road
Livonia, NY 14487
716-346-6859
|
|
|