Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:01:50 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Johanna,
I noticed this before and didn't comment then, but why do you call "become" an intransitive rather than a linking verb? They differ considerably, including in their complementation.
Herb
-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of Johanna Rubba
Sent: Fri 10/29/2004 7:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: to become you truly are the person?
Once again, the clause "who you truly are" is not the object of
anything. It is the subject complement of the infinitive "to become".
Objects appear only after transitive verbs; "become" is intransitive.
Maybe Wanda meant to say "complement" instead of "object". It's easy to
confuse the two terms, but "complement" is more general.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Associate Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue . San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184 . Fax: (805)-756-6374 . Dept. Phone. 756-2596
. E-mail: [log in to unmask] . Home page:
http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|