ATEG Archives

September 2004

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Beason <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:55:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I think the use of "which" as a demonstrative pronoun has been around
for many years and in different regions.  I know of no solid evidence
out there (though I imagine some linguist has studied the issue) on how
long it's been used this way, but I noticed its frequency in the late
1980s, even with professional writers.  It seems to me it is well on
it's way to evolving into a bona fide demonstrative pronoun.

Down here, we hear "them" used a demonstrative pronoun, as in "Them
shrimp sure are good" (or the more emphatic "Them there shrimp sure are
good').

Larry Beason

>>> [log in to unmask] 09/28/04 8:39 AM >>>
I have noticed "which" used as a sort of demonstrative pronoun quite
frequently in the New York Times, as in today's "Which is one reason
Gov. Tom Vilsack
is optimistic about John Kerry's chances . . . ."   Does anyone know how
long
this usage has been around?

Ed Schuster

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2