Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:18:18 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Although it would sound clumsy, I think it's possible to modify the
"swollen" with "very" in that sentence:
"His heart was very swollen with sorrow"
*If* that sounds acceptable to people, it's evidence that "swollen" is
purely adjectival here. That's the best test I know of for pinning down
the difference between the two construction types.
Bill Spruiell
Dept. of English
Central Michigan University
-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Diane Allen
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 7:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Truncated passive
In the sentence "His heart was swollen with sorrow" the strictest
interpretation would dictate that "swollen with sorrow" is a subject
complement following the linking verb "was". However, could it be read
as a
truncated passive, as in "His heart was swollen (by) sorrow" with "was"
serving as a passive auxiliary?
Diane
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|