ATEG Archives

August 2005

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:14:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
I classify modals as either auxiliary--must, will, would, may, might,
etc.--or primary: do, be, and have.

I don't think of auxiliary modals as verbs, though.  

But are they?

Christine  

-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Yates
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 10:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Used to

Classifying a grammatical form reveals underlying assumptions about what
grammar actually is. Classifying "used to" demonstrates this point.  

For example, if  grammar is understood as identifying differences in meaning
then Craig's answer makes perfect sense.

>>> [log in to unmask] 08/09/05 7:53 AM >>>

     Here's a quick answer before>I head off to teach./  "Used to" I would
classify as a modal auxiliary, somewhat similar to "would", but
implying that the pattern is no longer operative. 

***************

However, I think grammar (more accurately, syntax) is separate from meaning
and, from that perspective, used to lacks the crucial grammatical properties
of prototypical modals.  Modals (I recognize some defective modals with
ought to and must), and all other helping verbs have three core properties.
They "move" for yes-no questions (1).

1)  Can you speak English?

Not follows them.

2)  You can not speak English?

And, they are repeated in tag questions?

3)  You can speak English, can't you?

One of the key properties of main verbs, when they occur without any helping
verbs, take do-support.

4a)  You didn't use to speak English.
  b)  *You used not to speak English.

Consider the tag question.

5)  You used to speak English, didn't you?

************** 
I would be very, very reluctant to define an auxiliary this way.

> It's an auxiliary in that it can't be a main verb. (Here, it goes with
 > "love.")   

In French and German, the equivalent of the word for "want" is a modal, that
is not the case for English want.  "Want" in English has none of the
syntactic properties of English modals.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2