Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 31 May 2000 21:36:43 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
David,
Actually it is not a good definition of a passive sentence.
David D Mulroy wrote:
> At the risk of seeming very ignorant or obtuse -- I am puzzled by Bob
> Yates's citation of the definition of the passive voice from the web site,
> Plain English. It seems to me to be a good definition, especially
> the statement that the passive voice in English is normally created with a
> form of BE and a past participle.
> > How do you identify passive sentences?
> >
> > Passive sentences have two basic features, although both do not appear
> > in
> > every passive sentence.
> >
> > A past participle (generally with "ed" on the end); and
> >
> > A form of the verb "to be."
The only way the subordinate clause beginning with "although" can be
correct
is if the get-passive gets identified as a passive construction, too. I
don't think that passive construction gets defined very frequently in
the handbooks.
If we consider that the "passive sentence" means a tense clause in
passive voice, then you need BOTH a form of the verb BE and the past
participle.
Notice that under this definition, a perfect construction could be
identified as a passive construction as well as a progressive
construction.
Bob Yates, Central Missouri State University
|
|
|