Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:16:02 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My inland-Southern native dialect uses something like "pea-yun" (out of
context, it would be hard to distinguish from the inland Southern
present participle of a colloquial verb referring to urination). I have
seen phonics texts for early elementary ed that use "pen" as the primary
example word for "short e" -- an example which won't be at all useful
for any Southerner.
Bill Spruiell
Dept. of English
Central Michigan University
-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of DD Farms
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: fonetik
At 02:13 p.m. 18/08/2009, Edmond Wright wrote:
> > The trouble with 'fonetik' spelling is, of course, is indicated
> by what Seth
>Katz says about the Southerner's 'peen' for 'pen', for the result
>would be that
>everyone would write their own accent.
DD: All the Suthroners around me think a peen is part of a ball peen
hammer, or the using of it. Pen is pronounced pen-uh. The 'e' is
close to the sound of 'Eh?" The n is not unusual for all of us
English speakers, but the suffix 'uh' is. I am not sure, but I think
we add it to all words ending in a consonant. Just thought of that.
We do tend to stick a lot of schwas in where they are just word
extenders. It is sort of like we were getting paid by the syllables
and not the words.
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|