Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:06:45 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Oh my, I should think that was obvious. Look to the umbilicus.
On Nov 17, 2010, at 6:58 PM, Brett Reynolds wrote:
> On 2010-11-17, at 6:52 PM, Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar wrote:
>
>> This passage does not negate what I have been saying about basic grammar definitions: grammar is a subjective reality.
>
> If so, how then do naive connectionist networks successfully represent lexical categories very similar to the ones that linguists arrive at?
>
> Best,
> Brett
>
> -----------------------
> Brett Reynolds
> English Language Centre
> Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning
> Toronto, Ontario, Canada
> [log in to unmask]
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|