ATEG Archives

January 2009

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Veit, Richard" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:32:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Herb,

By a collective interpretation, do you mean you opt for singular verbs (is/takes) in both clauses?

Dick
________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of STAHLKE, HERBERT F [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Unusual SV agreement problem

What the plural object and possessive pronoun suggest is the collective interpretation of “one or two.”  Agreement is triggered by the number of the (nearest) subject term.  The question in this case is whether the proximity rule applies or the subject is collective.  I lean towards the latter.

Herb

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2