Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:39:09 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Re passive vs. active past participles: given that passive sentences are
relatively rare in most genres of English, it is probably true that most
occurrences of the past participle verb form are not passive.
I think what Dick Veit is getting at is that when a past participle is
used as a modifier (half-eaten cookies) rather than as part of a verb
phrase (we have eaten the cookies), it is most often passive. I think he
is thinking of occurrences of participles in participial phrases -- 'the
investors, _discouraged_ by the wildly fluctuating market, retreated to
blue-chip mutual funds'. But what about cases like 'a fallen tree'?
'The tree fell', 'The tree has fallen' aren't passives.
Here again the category/function distinction is important. 'Participle'
is the category that the form of the verb belongs to -- it's one of a
verb's 'principal parts'; it has various functions -- as adjective-like
modifier, as part of a tense/aspect construction such as present
perfect, etc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184 • Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone. 756-259
• E-mail: [log in to unmask] • Home page: http://www.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
**
"Understanding is a lot like sex; it's got a practical purpose,
but that's not why people do it normally" - Frank Oppenheimer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|