ATEG Archives

March 2007

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Bralich <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:15:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (176 lines)
Making up new terminology, even new punctuation is legitimate of course, but it doesn't count as much until it is published in a refereed journal.  I personally like the term translinking and agree that it is better than complex transitive.  However, I am not sure that it is immediately apparant that the term is a cross between transitive and linking.  A hyphen might make this more apparant and the word more acceptable as "trans-linking."  Given the general formality of grammar, perhaps even a hyphenated "transitive-linking" may be better.  In any case, it is your term, but if it catches on without your having published it somewhere first, you may not get proper credit for it.  Worse yet, some less disciplined author may try and publish it without proper refernce.  

Phil Bralich

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Spruiell, William C" <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Mar 27, 2007 4:26 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Double object verbs and object plus object complement verbs
>
>I use "complex transitive," but to me, that term can cover other types
>of constructions as well -- it seems like a "none of the above" label
>devised to deal with anything other than linking, transitive, or
>ditransitive. 
>
>What I'd *like* to call the object complement constructions is
>"translinking," since I think it captures their structure better. For
>some reason, though, there appears to be a wholly-unfounded resistance
>to the idea that I, personally, can make up entirely new sets of grammar
>terminology. 
>
>Bill Spruiell
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stahlke, Herbert F.W.
>Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:50 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Double object verbs and object plus object complement verbs
>
>That term is used pretty widely in both pedagogical and standard
>reference grammars.
>
>Herb
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of Dallin
>Oaks
>Sent: Mon 3/26/2007 6:31 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Double object verbs and object plus object complement verbs
> 
>I have seen the term "complex transitive" verb.
>
> 
>
>Dallin D. Oaks
>
> 
>
>  _____  
>
>From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Phil Bralich
>Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:07 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Double object verbs and object plus object complement verbs
>
> 
>
>Is there a term to describe verbs that can take both a direct object and
>an
>object complement such as the following:
>
> 
>
>we made Mary happy
>
> 
>
>we called John, the boss.
>
> 
>
>I know that ditransitives are variously called ditransitives and double
>object verbs but do not know the term for the above.  Further, is there
>a
>term for a double object verb that also takes an object complement as in
>the
>following?  
>
> 
>
>we 
>
>
>
>-----Original Message----- 
>From: Alison Cochrane 
>Sent: Mar 26, 2007 5:35 PM 
>To: [log in to unmask] 
>Subject: Re: TESOL 2007 Survey on Writing Class Assessment and Feedback 
>
>
>
>
>Jerome
>
> 
>
>I am very interested in the results of your research.  Is there any way
>of
>receiving a copy of your findings?
>
> 
>
>Thank you.
>
> 
>
>Alison Cochrane
>
>ESL Teacher New York
>
> 
>
>"I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up
>where I needed to be. " 
>~ Kahlil Douglas Adams
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  _____  
>
>
>AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
>from
>AOL at  <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000339> AOL.com. 
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>interface
>at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or
>leave
>the list" 
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ 
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>interface
>at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or
>leave
>the list" 
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ 
>
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2