ATEG Archives

January 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Yates <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:46:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Susan Witt wrote:

>  We deprive ourselves of important
> insights when we get too narrow-minded in how we divide our investigations
> up, or put too many limitations on the kinds of things we look at.

I do not know the kinds of narrow-minded research that Susan Witt is
referring to.

All of the best research I know has native-speaker controls.  The
default assumption in the best SLA research is that second language
learners are like first language learners.  There is a lot of BAD SLA
research (see most of the stuff on contrastive rhetoric) which never
looks at what native speakers do.

Bob Yates, Central Missouri State University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2