ATEG Archives

May 2001

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Richard Veit, UNCW English Department" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 May 2001 21:48:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Verb aspect and ellipsis
>
>Elliptical clauses come from "be-deletion" and if there is no form of the
>verb "to be"
>in the underlying clause, there's nothing to (ahem!) 'ellipt.'

How then do we account for the following sentences?

(1) She raised three children despite working two jobs.
(2) She raised three children despite having worked two jobs.

There do not seem to be corresponding sentences with underlying "to be":

(3) *She raised three children despite she was working two jobs.
(4) *She raised three children despite she was having worked two jobs.

Dick Veit

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2