ATEG Archives

July 2010

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Spruiell, William C" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Jul 2010 15:31:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I ran across the following in ScienceDaily today. It's the kind of research result for which I'd really, really want to see multiple followup studies. The researchers found that a proportion of their (adult) test subjects couldn't understand passive sentences; I can't help suspecting that the journalist hyped the results in some way or there are other factors involved. Population variation in comprehension of particular constructions is something I think is highly likely (absolute phrases, anyone?), but.... the passive? That's always struck me as part of the basic toolkit. 

At any rate, I thought it might be of interest to the list, even if I want to take it with a bucket of salt. -- Bill Spruiell

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100706082156.htm




To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2